logo       

Re: DNS replies not RELATED/ESTABLISHED?: msg#00041

Subject: Re: DNS replies not RELATED/ESTABLISHED?
martin f krafft(madduck@xxxxxxxxxx) is reported to have said:
> also sprach Blair L Strang <bls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2005.03.15.2256 
> +0100]:
> > Sorry I didn't understand from your original post that this was
> > only happening occasionally.  Duh!
> 
> It does only happen occassionally...
> 
> > Perhaps look into ip_conntrack_max?
> 
> I don't have such a file. ip_conntrack_expect is the only other
> one...
> 

grep -i conntrack /boot/config-2.6.[7-10]
CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_CONNTRACK=m

Maybe you need to re-configure the kernel??

WT
-- 
The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much.
_______________________________________________________




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>