Re: Are unittests expected to fail?

Thanks Freddy,

Will give it a whirl.

Cheers,

David

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ZIGLIO Frediano" <Frediano.Ziglio@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:02 PM
Subject: RE: [freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?


> 
> Hi Freddy...
> 
> Thanks for responding...
> 
> >You are using TDS 4.2. Try with an higher TDS version. Usually I try 
> >with unixODBC. Current results (TDS5+, unixODBC) should be
> > - with GNU iconv + single-byte
> 
> Ok - point number one I was using the wrong TDS version - but 
> this doesn't affect what I see with the ODBC unit-tests.
> 
> Still 6 failures as before with unixODBC.
> (As for iconv - I'm not using GNU, just what comes with FreeTDS:
> 
> - connect - succeeds with several connection strings, but fails on the
>     old version, due to my inability to configure 
> odbcinst.ini properly.
>     Doesn't affect ability of other tests to connect. So 
> probably not an
>     issue.

Documentation problem...

my /etc/odbcinst.ini

[PostgreSQL]
Description             = ODBC for PostgreSQL
Driver          = /usr/lib/libodbcpsql.so
Setup           = /usr/lib/libodbcpsqlS.so
FileUsage               = 1

[ODBC]
Trace           = Yes
TraceFile               = /tmp/sql.log
ForceTrace              = No
Pooling         = No

[FreeTDS]
Description             = FreeTDS driver
Driver          =
/home/fziglio/cpp/freetds/freetds/src/odbc/.libs/libtdsodbc.so
Setup           =
/home/fziglio/cpp/freetds/freetds/src/odbc/.libs/libtdsodbc.so
FileUsage               = 1
CPTimeout               =
CPReuse         =

> - funccall - don't know what's wrong here. Output parameters?
> - moreandcount - odd. Returned 0 columns instead of 1.
> - params - Don't know. Does output parameter support work?

Mmm.. try using --enable-developing in configure. Developing code will
be enabled in 0.62

> - transaction - Don't know why commit failed.

Know. I don't still know if this is a bug or just a different and
correct implementation.

> - type - Well this is quite possibly down to iconv
> 

Related to ODBC3 updates. ODBC3 handle type in a weird way...

> I see that the last 3 are failures you listed. So the main 
> mystery is over funccall and moreandcount - I guess. Any ideas?
> 
> I've attached the output from make check, in case you
> or anyone else can be bothered.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> David
> 
> 

I think your problems are related to --enable-developing and
odbcinst.ini...

freddy77
_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
FreeTDS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds