RE: Does SQLBindParameter work with SQLExecDirect

> 
> Hi Freddy,
> 
> Thanks for the fix. I guess I can't complain about the bugfix 
> response time. 24 mins to reply to my email with fix in CVS 
> ain't at all bad. :-)
> 
> General question - am I mad to run against the 0.62 development 
> code? i.e....
> 
> Is it relatively stable (with the bonus of bug-fixes and extra 
> functionality making up for any occasional instability)? 
> I'm not about to ship any app code to a customer at this 
> moment in time - so quite stable is fine with me. (I don't 
> mind being an inadvertant beta tester for the occasional bug 
> that sneaks in).
> 
> OR is this code in major upheaval and not really worth trying 
> to use just yet?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> David
> 

IMHO there are some things to fix:
1- iconv stuff
2- SQLPutData
3- Sybase prepare using blobs

1- is stable if you use single byte encoding (ISO-8859-1, ISO-8859-15
are ok, UTF8, UCS2, BIG5 aren't) and GNU iconv (Linux use GNU iconv by
default).
2- do not use it !!! it do not work (it do not crash, just SQLPrepare
return SQL_ERROR, not SQL_NEED_DATA and SQLPutData do not work)
3- if you do not use Sybase servers is not a problem...

That's all. I suggest to use --enable-developing options. This option
will have no effect when 2 and 3 will be fixed.

freddy77