|
Re: Weird memory leak: msg#00128db.sqlite.general
> This might be a bit left-field, but are you working on some kind of tempfs > or swapfs? Hi Ben, I'm just on a normal HFS+ file system. The file I'm writing is not under /tmp. > Another interpretation of the results is normal virtual filesystem > caching. If you read large files from disk then a modern operating system > will keep what it can in memory, just in case you want to go and read the > file again. This sure seems like what's happening (except I'm primarily writing to the file -- not reading) but it's somehow backfiring and not releasing the cached part. That's what it looks like anyway. I have no idea what's ACTUALLY happening. I've never seen anything quite like it. Steven ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/CBxunD/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/EbFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: sqlite-unsubscribe-VgYJa0VH1e9BDgjK7y7TUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Read-only mode?: 00128, D. Richard Hipp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | SQLite and Introspection: 00128, Tito Ciuro |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Weird memory leaki: 00128, ben . carlyle-LNVqYbe/PQpWk0Htik3J/w |
| Next by Thread: | DbExpress 2.7.3 re-download: 00128, Marco Wobben |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |