Re: Marking record as "changed"

Mike Richardson wrote:
> On Friday 29 April 2005 19:58, Andreas Schwarz wrote:
>
> > In a form I have a script that changes the value of a field. When I
> > close the form and there have been no other changes, the change is lost,
> > because Rekall doesn't realize the script has changed something that
> > needs to be saved. Is this a bug, or should I do something to let rekall
> > now that the record has been changed?
>
>
> Sounds like a bug. If you change the field "by hand" does it then do the right 
> thing?

Yes.

> I think the problem will be (just coming up to midnight so getting too dozy to 
> look right now) that I need to set the data-changed flag when a script 
> updates a value (but not fire the on-change event). Will take a dekko 
> tomorrow
>
> BTW, which version/platform/etc ?

Tested with 2.3/OS X & 2.2/Linux.