|
| <prev next> |
Re: pgpool-II load balance performance: msg#00000db.postgresql.pgpool.general
Hello, Yoshiyuki. On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:49:33 +0900 (JST) Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba-r5vX20e9KLfqq2nvvmkE/A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > From: Mikhail Kolesnik <mike-KDjF+AoAXOlM656bX5wj8A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [Pgpool-general] pgpool-II load balance performance > Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:18:20 +0200 > > > >From my tests performance of pgpool in master/slave mode with 2 nodes is > > near 85% of a _single_ node performance on the 'tpc-b'-like queries, > > simple 'select' or complex 'select' with heavy sorting and few > > additional conditions. > > Could you try CVS HEAD? I've fixed a performance issue. >[...] Thanks, I've tried cvs version. But got nearly the same performance on that requests. However using other requests that do not transfer much data over the network (SELECT sum(foo) FROM bar WHERE ...) are balanced good enough. It's hardly a network bottleneck and I should try the real application to judge the performance which will depend on many factors. -- Mikhail Kolesnik ICQ: 260259143 IRC: mike_k at freenode/#crux, rusnet/#yalta |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Pgpool and pgpool-II precisions: 00000, "Stéphane A. Schildknecht" |
|---|---|
| Next by Thread: | Pgpool and pgpool-II precisions: 00000, "Stéphane A. Schildknecht" |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |