Re: psqlODBC LGPL Licence

Perhaps I can be of some assistance on this matter.  All of the
contributions made by Insight were made under my direction.  At the time
(about the turn of the century) I was a full-timer at Insight overseeing
a pilot project which needed the ODBC driver to be more functional.
Byron Nikolaidis actually performed the work as an employee of Insight.
For some time after leaving Insight he made contributions of his own.
Currently, I'm doing some contract work for Insight.  So if there is any
thing I can do to alleviate you concerns, let me know.

David


-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 5:08 PM
To: Peter Eisentraut; pgsql-odbc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ODBC] psqlODBC LGPL Licence


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Mon 7/19/2004 8:17 PM
To: Dave Page; pgsql-odbc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ODBC] psqlODBC LGPL Licence

> As long as you are describing the authorship, both should be listed,
as 
> is done in notice.txt.

Yeah, I'm not suggesting we remove them from the licence/credits etc,
but rather the version resource for the Windows DLL. If you look at the
list of drivers in the ODBC driver manager, it's that name you see as
the supplier of the driver. It's been that long since they've been
involved that I think it would be better to see PGDG there as the
primary distributor. 

Regards, Dave



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly