logo       

Sponsor
FREE Network Mapping Tool for Microsoft® Office Visio® Professional 2007
Don't map your network by hand - let LANsurveyor Exx press for Microsoft Visio Professional 2007 automatically create network diagrams for you!

Re: Fix for buffer overflow ready [was: Fwd: Bug#247306: odbc-postgresql: S: msg#00020

db.postgresql.odbc

Subject: Re: Fix for buffer overflow ready [was: Fwd: Bug#247306: odbc-postgresql: SIGSEGV with long inputs (> 10000 bytes)]

Hi!

On 2004-05-13 19:43 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Silently truncating various pieces of information is probably not the
> right thing.

But IMHO still better than overwriting arbitrary other data and code.
If an user supplies bogus input, he cannot expect to get something
sane out.

> What are you truncating?

By now:

- DSN, username, password, and the whole connection string;

- table names in info.c:
make_string(szTableName, cbTableName, pktab, sizeof(pktab));

- Two calls in info.c:
make_string(szPkTableName, cbPkTableName, pk_table_needed,
sizeof(pk_table_needed));
make_string(szFkTableName, cbFkTableName, fk_table_needed,
sizeof(fk_table_needed));

If these values should not be truncated, then psqlodbc should not use
fixed buffer sizes. Currently truncating them is way more sane than
letting them mess up the whole memory.

> If it's a query string you might open yourself up to SQL-injection
> type problems.

I don't think that the patch affects whole query strings, but of
course I may be wrong. The point of this patch was to fix the most
apparent overflows with least possible changes, and after a week of
silence on the lists I just had to do something about it. And now at
least the connection and exec methods seem to work safely.

> Plus, the ODBC driver appears to have buffer overruns all over the
> place. We need to replace every instance of strcpy, strcat, sprintf,
> make_string, and the various other feeble attempts with pqexpbuffer
> from libpq. That's the only way to solve this problem once and for
> all.

I would be glad if the next psqlodbc version would be written in a
sane way, without fixed string lengths and with a clear and safe
string "class" interface. But doing this is far beyond the scope of a
security patch (especially for Debian stable).

One question: which mailing list is the better place to discuss this?
-odbc or -bugs?

Thanks and have a nice day!

Martin

--
Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer
martin@xxxxxxxxx mpitt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsor
FREE Network Mapping Tool for Microsoft® OfficeVisio Professional 2007
Don't map your network by hand - let LANsurveyor Express for Microsoft Visio Professional 2007
automatically create network diagrams for you!
Google Custom Search

Free Magazines

Cisco News
Receive a free quarterly e-newsletter with exclusive articles on how Cisco IT uses its own products and solutions to enable the business.
subscribe

Systems Management News, the newspaper for IT systems administration and data center managers! Each issue of Systems Management News is chock-full of news and analysis to help you understand what's happening in your field.
subscribe

The Enterprise Newsweekly eWeek is the essential technology information source for builders of e-business.
subscribe

Oracle Magazine Oracle Magazine contains technology strategy articles, sample code, tips, Oracle and partner news, how to articles for developers and DBAs, and more. Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL) is the world's largest enterprise software company.
subscribe

Total Telecom Total Telecom is "The Economist of the communications industry".
subscribe

Navigation

Home | sitemap | advertise | OSDir is an inevitable website. super tiny logo