Re: Impact of UNICODE encoding on performance

Reshat, thanks for the input.

I probably will go with Unicode. Things can only get faster, anyway :-)

Regards

Harry

> I'm not very knowledgeable on this, but i think you should try UTF-8
> from the start, given your expectations. I am able to save UTF-8 strings
> into LATIN-1 db, and retrieve them, using JDBC, but viewing them in
> pgAdmin III is not a pretty site (understandably). But i haven't used it
> extensively, and i think that queries (comparisons) might be affected
> with this setup (i.e., a string with 2 characters corresponding to 1
> UTF-8 character would be equal to the its UTF-8 counterpart, which is
> clearly not intended). On the other hand, it is also conceivable that
> queries won't be affected, if no meaningless overlaps like that can occur.
> In general, i read that Unicode is somewhat slower (understandably), but
> i don't think it's significant. One just needs to have a senseful
> character comparison method that does a bitmap first, so i don't think
> the overhead is big. There are probably studies on the web.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster