logo       
Google Custom Search
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Re: Returning arbitrary row sets from a function: msg#00156

Subject: Re: Returning arbitrary row sets from a function
We appear to be having the same problems posting ;-)

Well, is it possible to run two different versions of postgresql side-by-side on the same machine? I don't want to end up with a non-working database just because I've made some stupid mistake installing a new version, and then find that I can't revert back to the old one either.

Is it at least possible to have two different versions installed side-by-side, even if you can only have one running at a time?


Cheers,
Gerard.


From: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Gerard Mason" <gerardmason@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: pgsql-novice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Returning arbitrary row sets from a function Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:28:04 -0500 Received: from mc5-f1.hotmail.com ([65.54.252.8]) by mc5-s6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 06:33:44 -0800 Received: from noon.pghoster.com ([64.246.0.64]) by mc5-f1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 06:33:43 -0800 Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71] helo=postgresql.org)by noon.pghoster.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24)id 1AWGCE-00055p-BQ; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:29:10 -0600 Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2])by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1F5D1DBD0for <pgsql-novice-postgresql.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:28:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43887-04 for <pgsql-novice-postgresql.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:28:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C331D1DC11for <pgsql-novice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:28:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBGES419021036;Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:28:04 -0500 (EST)
X-Message-Info: pdGgd64CkwbpMDe6De87M4BVeULv8cLfHTWRrON5Om0=
X-Original-To: pgsql-novice-postgresql.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BAY7-F113qicRfZ7iHY0003b340@xxxxxxxxxxx> References: <BAY7-F113qicRfZ7iHY0003b340@xxxxxxxxxxx> Comments: In-reply-to "Gerard Mason" <gerardmason@xxxxxxxxxxx>message dated "Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:18:54 +0000"
Message-ID: <21035.1071584884@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-novice
Precedence: bulk
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - noon.pghoster.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - hotmail.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - postgresql.org
Return-Path: pgsql-novice-owner+M9061@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Dec 2003 14:33:43.0294 (UTC) FILETIME=[9B0DD9E0:01C3C3E1]

"Gerard Mason" <gerardmason@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> That seems to be what the documentation is suggesting the return type should
> be (the examples are very incomplete!), but it doesn't work (7.1.3,
                                                               ^^^^^

That seems to be your problem ;-)

> and I can't upgrade without buying a new machine, which I don't want
> to do just yet).

Surely you can upgrade.  If the problem is lack of RPMs for whatever OS
you are running, you could just compile Postgres from source.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
     joining column's datatypes do not match




Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>