|
GPL Licence: msg#00264db.postgresql.novice
PostgreSQL, Please help me. I need to understand how you see the bounderies of the GPL licence. I want to use PostgreSQL as the server of a commercial (non GPL) application. All PostgreSQL components will be clearly marked GPL with URL to sourse code, and readable GPL, to the satisfaction of PostgreSQL. Can you please tell me whether that is acceptable under your understanding of the GPL? Specifically, with respect to MySQL take on the GPL, where the use of API's and lib's are seen as an extension to the main code, and therefore all applications must be GPL, or have a bespoke licence, or be illigal. Or other people who think that the use of API's and lib's form a logical abstracted boundery between the server and client, therefore not extending the product, therefore allowing commercial applications which are not GPL. Can you please let me know whether we can use PostgrSQL or not? Thanks, Ben Clewett. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why would this crash my server: 00264, Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: GPL Licence: 00264, Ben Clewett |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why would this crash my serveri: 00264, Tom Lane |
| Next by Thread: | Re: GPL Licence: 00264, Andrew McMillan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |