Re: new driver build announcements?

That's cool - I figured it'd be something like that.

When you release a new build, can you post an announcements to pgsql-jdbc
with a brief description of changes to the driver?

That way, we'd know about your hard work :)
And whether we need the latest changes

thx and keep up the great work
-a


-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Barry Lind
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 0:49
To: Andy Kriger
Cc: Pgsql-Jdbc
Subject: Re: [JDBC] new driver build announcements?


 > While I'd love to offer my time to do this, I'm swamped with work
right now
 > (talk to me in a month or two and things might be better).

I think that sums it up well.  If I had a lot more time available,
perhaps I could do more on the website, but as of now I don't even have
enough time to apply all the outstanding patches.

If anyone wants to work on updating the website, feel free to submit a
patch to the list, and I will be glad to apply it.

thanks,
--Barry


Andy Kriger wrote:
> (apologies if this shows up twice - I think it got reject the first time,
> resending to be sure it makes it)
>
> I was running into a problem with getImportedKeys & getExportedKeys taking
> forever and a day. After a scan of the list archives, I checked for a
newer
> driver build (I was using 106) and that fixed the problem (and how - times
> dropped from minutes to split seconds - great fix!).
>
> However, I didn't see:
> * an announcement of the driver on pgsql-jdbc
> * any information on the front page of http://jdbc.postgresql.org/
> * a readme file of what changed btw 106 & 107
>
> Basically, no info that could help people use the JDBC drivers most
> effectively. Wondering if the jdbc.postgresql.org site is really where I
> should be looking for info or if there is a better site available.
>
> Things that'd help:
> * announcements of new builds
> * readme files for new builds
> * an update of the jdbc.postgresql.org site (e.g. the front page latest
news
> ends with 30 Nov, and the other resources link points to a JDBC2
compliance
> page last tested against postgres7.1.2)
>
> While I'd love to offer my time to do this, I'm swamped with work right
now
> (talk to me in a month or two and things might be better). Any thoughts
from
> the JDBC developers?
>
> thx
> andy kriger
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly