|
Re: make check failures in current cvs: msg#00240db.postgresql.jdbc
Thanks guys for the info on the tests. It's good to know I didn't break something. I've got COPY (and its unit tests) working consistently, but it needs to be more efficent/scalable. I'm testing it out with 8-35 meg copies. I'll post ASAP. If this were incorporated, would it go into 7.3? On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Barry Lind wrote: > Dave, > > I believe the last one also needs to be fixed in the test case. I think > it is related to a bugfix I did last weekend. > > Michael, > > I think all three failures are problems with the tests not problems with > the code. > > thanks, > --Barry > > > Dave Cramer wrote: > > >Barry, > > > >My comments are below > > > > > >On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 12:44, Barry Lind wrote: > > > > > >>Dave, > >> > >>Have you seen these errors in the test suite before? > >> > >>thanks, > >>--Barry > >> > >> > >>Michael Adler wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>While adding some test methods to test the COPY protocol, I've notice some > >>>failures in the current cvs. Is this to be expected? Or does this point to > >>>a problem with my local setup? > >>> > >>>test: > >>> [junit] .................F......F................F.. > >>> [junit] ............... > >>> [junit] Time: 12.438 > >>> [junit] There were 3 failures: > >>> [junit] 1) > >>> testCapabilities(org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.DatabaseMetaDataTest)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError > >>> [junit] at > >>> org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.DatabaseMetaDataTest.testCapabilities(DatabaseMetaDataTest.java:104) > >>> > >>> > >this needs to be fixed in the test case > > > > > >>> [junit] 2) > >>> testForeignKeys(org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.DatabaseMetaDataTest)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError > >>> [junit] at > >>> org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.DatabaseMetaDataTest.testForeignKeys(DatabaseMetaDataTest.java:265) > >>> > >>> > >this needs to be fixed in the test case, and is a result of a late > >change > > > > > >>> [junit] 3) > >>> testSetTimestamp(org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError > >>> [junit] at > >>> org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest.timestampTest(TimestampTest.java:120) > >>> [junit] at > >>> org.postgresql.test.jdbc2.TimestampTest.testSetTimestamp(TimestampTest.java:92) > >>> > >>> > >this one I don't know anything about, but have seen it > > > > > >>> [junit] FAILURES!!! > >>> [junit] Tests run: 56, Failures: 3, Errors: 0 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>Thanks, > >>> > >>>Mike > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | JDBC + PL/pgSQL ?: 00240, Daryl Beattie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: JDBC + PL/pgSQL ?: 00240, Dave Cramer |
| Previous by Thread: | JDBC + PL/pgSQL ?i: 00240, Daryl Beattie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: make check failures in current cvs: 00240, Dave Cramer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |