Bruce,
> This seems like a valuable feature, as others have mentioned. However,
> should it also prevent changes to default_transaction_read_only?
>
> What is the use case for this functionality?
I thought that this was rejected thouroughly by Tom some months ago. He
argued pretty strongly that READ ONLY transactions were *not* a security
feature and that trying to make them one would work very poorly.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
