Re: replace oidrand() with random_sample()

Tom Lane wrote:
> > Whether we leave it in or not, I'd vote for eventually getting rid of
> > the current version. So if we keep it, we could add random_sample() and
> > keep oidrand() as a wrapper over it (that emits an elog(WARNING) to let
> > people know it's been deprecated). And if we want to get rid of it, we
> > could probably just add the elog() for 7.4 and then remove it outright
> > in 7.5.
> 
> Well, now you're adding a whole lot of maintenance effort to support
> some quite-hypothetical users of a function we all agree is junk ;-)
> 
> I think we should either leave it be, or rip it out and be done with it.
> I don't actually much care which (does anyone out there have an
> opinion?).  But a phased-obsolescence plan is far more work than it
> deserves.

Yea, just remove it and we can re-add it later if people ask for it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster