Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Chris,
>
> > Claims of "conformance" are a bit specious when there isn't much of a
> > standards body on this anymore.  And vendors that consider themselves
> > commercially important are quite prepared to ignore standards whenever
> > it seems convenient.
>
> Yeah, why do you think they disbanded the compliance team in the first place?
> Just ask Joe Celko ....

I haven't spoken with Joe in years.. why don't you tell us?

-- 
Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly