|
Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance: msg#00229db.postgresql.advocacy
Chris, > Claims of "conformance" are a bit specious when there isn't much of a > standards body on this anymore. And vendors that consider themselves > commercially important are quite prepared to ignore standards whenever > it seems convenient. Yeah, why do you think they disbanded the compliance team in the first place? Just ask Joe Celko .... -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance: 00229, Christopher Browne |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance: 00229, Dan Langille |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformancei: 00229, Christopher Browne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance: 00229, Dan Langille |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |