|
Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement: msg#00166db.postgresql.advocacy
Quoth josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Josh Berkus): > Also, if you have T-SQL procedures, you would have to somehow implement T-SQL > for Postgres; translating the procedures is really not an option. You would be hit by a lot of other similar sorts of "impedances" to those found with MySQL. Most conspicuously, MySQL is most likely an imitator of Sybase (progenitor of the code that Microsoft sells) in having "autoincrementing columns" as compared to PostgreSQL's notion of "sequence objects." -- wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','ntlug.org'). http://cbbrowne.com/info/spreadsheets.html Monday is an awful way to spend one seventh of your life. -- Unknown ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement: 00166, Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Question: 00166, David Costa |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacementi: 00166, Josh Berkus |
| Next by Thread: | Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement: 00166, Rod Taylor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |