|
Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement: msg#00165db.postgresql.advocacy
Lane, > So, here's my thought. How difficult would it be to build a server daemon > that used PostgreSQL on the backend, and presented it to the network as a > SQL Server compatible DB? I think you're on the wrong list for this question. I take it you're talking a compatibitily layer, like Rosetta? I would think that writing a program to broker requests on port 1433 and re-interpret SQL Server specific syntax would be a managable project for a good C or Perl hacker. What would be difficult-to-impossible is: 1) making it scale & perform well (in my experience, MS SQL Server accessed through Rosetta loses about 40% performance and is very limited in scalability). 2) Making it integrate well with MS networking and the MS ODBC/OLEDB/ADO/.NET clients. Also, if you have T-SQL procedures, you would have to somehow implement T-SQL for Postgres; translating the procedures is really not an option. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement: 00165, Lane Beneke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement: 00165, Christopher Browne |
| Previous by Thread: | plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacementi: 00165, Lane Beneke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement: 00165, Christopher Browne |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |