|
plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement: msg#00164db.postgresql.advocacy
I've been using PostgreSQL for a few months now and am very happy with its functionality and performance. Top-notch product that competes favorably with every DB I've used. However, most of my tables are still in MS SQL Server 2000 Enterprise. I often have to make it my target for purposes of compatibility. On some applications, the license costs are killers at around $400/client. So, here's my thought. How difficult would it be to build a server daemon that used PostgreSQL on the backend, and presented it to the network as a SQL Server compatible DB? Some of the work is already available in the 'tsql' client. This must've been thought of before, but does this idea have legs? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: A dubious claim to fame ...: 00164, Lamar Owen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement: 00164, Josh Berkus |
| Previous by Thread: | A dubious claim to fame ...i: 00164, Josh Berkus |
| Next by Thread: | Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement: 00164, Josh Berkus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |