Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting

On Tuesday 24 June 2003 11:47 am, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Can I propose that we move this thread to PGSQL-DOCS?   And that you all
> join PGSQL-DOCS?    I really would like to see more people formally
> involved in writing documentation for PostgreSQL, and will work hard to
> make it easier for people to contribute.

Agreed. I am starting a list of what can/need to be indexed on pgsql docs site 
as I'm working to build a new site with pgsql as a backend. I think Tom Lane 
suggested that.. I would like to know where I can send the list. It'll 
probably somekind of a work in progress. So if everyone else can contribute, 
it'll be so much faster. Probably a semi-automated system for handling those 
lists?

RDB

-- 
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
-------------------------------------------------
/"\  ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML    
\ /  email and proprietary format      
 X   attachments.
/ \
-------------------------------------------------
Have you been used by Microsoft today? 
Choose your life. Choose freedom. 
Choose LINUX.
-------------------------------------------------


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly