|
RE: Create Table Bug w/Varchar and Char: msg#01117db.mysql.general
On 28 Jun 2002, at 15:10, Don Vu wrote: > interesting "feature"....thanks... In the cases you present it certainly seems to be a feature, since specifying the column types as VARCHAR wastes space for no advantage. A VARCHAR(1) takes 2 bytes of storage, while a CHAR(1) takes only 1 byte. Similarly, a VARCHAR(2) takes 2 or 3 bytes, depending on whether it contains 1 or 2 characters, while a CHAR(2) always takes 2. Why is it important that the columns be VARCHAR? What problems does the change cause? [Filter fodder: SQL] -- Keith C. Ivey <keith@xxxxxxxxxxx> Tobacco Documents Online http://tobaccodocuments.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <mysql-thread113366@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To unsubscribe, e-mail <mysql-unsubscribe-gcdmg-mysql=m.gmane.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | mysql.sock: 01117, Rahadul Kabir |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | InnoDB - count() slow: 01117, Oleg |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Create Table Bug w/Varchar and Chari: 01117, Don Vu |
| Next by Thread: | DATE_FORMAT(): 01117, Jason Soza |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |