|
Re: feature proposal: auto increment prefix: msg#00410db.mysql.devel
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 03:51:02AM +0300, Michael Widenius wrote: > > Hi! > > Catching up with some old emails... > > >>>>> "Arjen" == Arjen Lentz <arjen@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > <cut> > > >> For example, I remember reading in the docs that there aren't enough > >> bits in the current .frm format to store additional properties. Is > >> this still true? If yes, would it be acceptable to use a special, > >> reserved, column name for this purpose, until the .frm format is > >> changed? > > Arjen> As a temporary kludge, possibly. In case of GUID or UUID I think that > Arjen> would be ok, until the FRM can handle new column types. As long as the > Arjen> code is clean and the kludge can be cleaned up easily later. > > I forgot to add in the previous email that we should of course also > add a column type that is OID that automaticly gets the OID value on > insert. Ah. And I'd replied to the previous email before reading this one :) Tim. -- MySQL Internals Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/internals To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/internals?unsub=gcdmd-internals@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: feature proposal: auto increment prefix: 00410, Tim Bunce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re[2]: feature proposal: auto increment prefix: 00410, Miroslav Nachev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: feature proposal: auto increment prefixi: 00410, Michael Widenius |
| Next by Thread: | bk commit into 5.0 tree (1.1526): 00410, pem |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |