logo       

Re: feature proposal: auto increment prefix: msg#00408

db.mysql.devel

Subject: Re: feature proposal: auto increment prefix


Hi!

Catching up with some old emails...

>>>>> "Arjen" == Arjen Lentz <arjen@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

<cut>

>> For example, I remember reading in the docs that there aren't enough
>> bits in the current .frm format to store additional properties. Is
>> this still true? If yes, would it be acceptable to use a special,
>> reserved, column name for this purpose, until the .frm format is
>> changed?

Arjen> As a temporary kludge, possibly. In case of GUID or UUID I think that
Arjen> would be ok, until the FRM can handle new column types. As long as the
Arjen> code is clean and the kludge can be cleaned up easily later.

I forgot to add in the previous email that we should of course also
add a column type that is OID that automaticly gets the OID value on
insert.

Regards,
Monty

--
MySQL Internals Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/internals
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/internals?unsub=gcdmd-internals@xxxxxxxxxxx




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise