Re: RELEASE: 1.7.11

Would you consider this new realse stable? Im working on a telnet bbs,
with a mysql back end, which will linked to the web via php. Considering
the ability grab results using ["fieldname"] is being cut (is that
correct?) I want to be using the latest version. Also will this work
a-ok with gcc 3.3 now?

Darren

>>> Warren Young <mysqlpp@xxxxxxxxxxx> 17/08/04 23:36:07 >>>
Talk about "release early, release often"!  :)

     o Renamed mysql++, defs and define_short files, adding .hh to the
       end of each.  (They're header files!)  This shouldn't impact
       library users, since these are hopefully used internal to the
       library only.

     o Removed sqlplus.hh file.  Use mysql++.hh instead.
        
     o Added mysql++.spec, extracted from contributed 1.7.9 source
RPM,
       and updated it significantly.  Also, added an 'rpm' target to
       Makefile.am to automate the process of building RPMs.

     o Added bootstrap and LGPL files to distribution tarball.

     o Added pre-1.7.10 history to this file.

     o Removed .version file.  Apparently it's something required by
old
       versions of libtool.

I've also added a binary RPM for RH9 to the web page.

        http://tangentsoft.net/mysql++/ 

I may not continue offering these RPMs, as they're rather large, and 
it's not hard to make your own: just say 'make rpm' as root.

-- 
MySQL++ Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus 
To unsubscribe:   
http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus?unsub=dmcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


-- 
MySQL++ Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus
To unsubscribe:    
http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus?unsub=gcdmc-plusplus@xxxxxxxxxxx