|
|
Choosing A Webhost: |
Re: AW: Index use vs Table Scan!: msg#00175db.maxdb
> Hello again! > > I have real data in the relation and the EXPLAIN-statement states a huge > page count and a table scan, when I use the <= or < operator in the > statement > > explain select * from s_event where (eventtime < 1111056567313) > > and a page count that is much more smaller and the use of an index, when I > use the statement > > explain select * from s_event where (eventtime = 1111056567313) > > The manual and the section you mentioned doesn't explain this behaviour, > at > least I haven't found the explanation. > > Any further hints/tipps? Did you update statistics? Also, you could try with a clustered index on column eventtime. My guess would be that that would be used for this type of query as it is sorted and thus allows for easier extraction of ranges. Kind regards robert > > Thanx a lot! > > Chris > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Grossmann, Gert [mailto:gert.grossmann@xxxxxxx] > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. März 2005 09:07 > An: maxdb > Betreff: AW: Index use vs Table Scan! > > > Simple check access path with "EXPLAIN SELECT ... ". Now you can see if > index or key is used. For further information please read manual section > 'Background Knowledge/SQL Optimizer'. > > Gert > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Christoph Weser [mailto:Christoph.Weser@xxxxxxxxx] > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. März 2005 08:50 > An: Grossmann, Gert > Betreff: AW: Index use vs Table Scan! > > > Hello Gert! > > Thanx for your quick replay and a simple answer.....how do I check the > access paths and how to interpret results? > There are right now some real data in the table...a few million rows. > > Thanx a lot for your help! > > Chris > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Grossmann, Gert [mailto:gert.grossmann@xxxxxxx] > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. März 2005 07:02 > An: maxdb (E-Mail) > Betreff: AW: Index use vs Table Scan! > > > MaxDB has a cost based optimizer. Without any data in relations there is > no > difference between table scan vs. index access. > Fill your releation "s_event" with real data and then check access pathes. > > Gert > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Christoph Weser [mailto:Christoph.Weser@xxxxxxxxx] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. März 2005 17:29 > An: maxdb (E-Mail) > Betreff: Index use vs Table Scan! > > > Hello All! > > I'm running 7.4.3.32 on a W2K system. > > I have the table: > > create table s_event ( > EID FIXED(38,0) NOT NULL, > ETID FIXED(38,0) NOT NULL, > SID FIXED(38,0) NOT NULL, > CID FIXED(38,0), > eventtime FIXED(38,0) NOT NULL, > data LONG BYTE, > > FOREIGN KEY(ETID) references s_eventtype(ETID) > ) > > // > create index s_event_x1 on s_event(EID) > // > create index s_event_x2 on s_event(ETID) > // > create index s_event_x3 on s_event(SID) > // > create index s_event_x4 on s_event(CID) > // > create index s_event_x5 on s_event(eventtime) > > When I do an > > explain select * from s_event where (eventtime < 1111056567313) > > the result is a table scan! > > On the other hand, when I do an > > explain select * from s_event where (eventtime = 1111056567313) > > The DB does an index scan and it uses the index s_event_x5. > > > Is there a way for the first statement, that the db also does an index > scan > and not the expensive table scan??? > Why isn't an index also used in the first statement? Any explanations? > > Thanx a lot to everyone!!! > > Chris > > -- > MaxDB Discussion Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb > To unsubscribe: > http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb?unsub=gert.grossmann@xxxxxxx > > > -- > MaxDB Discussion Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb > To unsubscribe: > http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb?unsub=christoph.weser@xxxxxxxxx > > -- > MaxDB Discussion Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb > To unsubscribe: > http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb?unsub=christoph.weser@xxxxxxxxx > > -- > MaxDB Discussion Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb > To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb?unsub=bob.news@xxxxxxx > -- DSL Komplett von GMX +++ Supergünstig und stressfrei einsteigen! AKTION "Kein Einrichtungspreis" nutzen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl -- MaxDB Discussion Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/maxdb?unsub=gcdm-maxdb@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | ODBC on W98 and WME, Jonathan Sarabia |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | AW: Index use vs Table Scan!, Zabach, Elke |
| Previous by Thread: | AW: Index use vs Table Scan!, Christoph Weser |
| Next by Thread: | AW: Index use vs Table Scan!, Zabach, Elke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Free MagazinesCisco NewsReceive a free quarterly e-newsletter with exclusive articles on how Cisco IT uses its own products and solutions to enable the business. subscribe Systems Management News, the newspaper for IT systems administration and data center managers! Each issue of Systems Management News is chock-full of news and analysis to help you understand what's happening in your field. subscribe The Enterprise Newsweekly eWeek is the essential technology information source for builders of e-business. subscribe Oracle Magazine Oracle Magazine contains technology strategy articles, sample code, tips, Oracle and partner news, how to articles for developers and DBAs, and more. Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL) is the world's largest enterprise software company. subscribe Total Telecom Total Telecom is "The Economist of the communications industry". subscribe |
Home
| advertise | OSDir is
an inevitable website.
|