Subject: Escape codes - refresh my memory. - msg#01573

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

RE: FoxPro Developer, Leeds/Bradford UK

Dave Crozier said "I think it is actually for the old "Leeds Permanent" building society. They have a large FOXPRO note "not VFP" system installed for all their branches. " interesting - I did some work for them decades ago (a security review iirc) - I thought they were a 'Clipper' house (and COBOL of course!). Andrew Davies  MBCS CITP   - AndyD        8-)# ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. Please contact internet.administrators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with any queries. ********************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@xxxxxxxxx Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

RE: Problems Connecting to M

Andy, Sorted it all out now thanks. It was just the "server instance" as opposed to server that threw me. i.e whenever M$ ask for a server eithe use ".\sqlexpress" (lower case only) or "<server name>\sqlexpress" I stupidly (BG) thought that server simply required <server Name> as in every other piece of software. So much for standards. Dave Crozier The secret to staying young is to live honestly, eat slowly, and to lie about your age -----Original Message----- From: profox-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:profox-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy Davies Sent: 20 July 2006 11:21 To: profox@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Problems Connecting to M$SQLExpress pmfji-late - does this help: http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlexpress/archive/2004/07/23/192044.aspx "The default install for SQL Express installs Express as a named instance(called SQLExpress), with no network listening and with Windows Authentication support only... " Andrew Davies  MBCS CITP   - AndyD        8-)# ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. Please contact internet.administrators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with any queries. ********************************************************************** [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@xxxxxxxxx Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Problems with VFPENCRYPTION.FLL

I'm using Craig Boyd's fantastic FLL in a VFP9 SP1 application to encrypt some security settings. In a nutshell, the security data is in XML format, but encrypted using the encryptfile function. When a user opens the application, it looks for the security file and decrypts it into a string. Then I examine the string to see if the first part is a valid XML header. If not then I assume the file has been tampered with and create a new one. If not it does an XMLTOCURSOR and I have my security info. All fine, except that occasionally it will decide that the file has been tampered with when it hasn't. So my question is - has anyone come across a situation where decryptfile fails? I'm using RC4 encryption for simplicity BTW. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke@xxxxxxxxxxx -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Access all of your messages and folders wherever you are _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@xxxxxxxxx Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

RE: Escape codes - refresh my memory.

Does not (should not) matter at all. Robbo. -----Original Message----- From: profox-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:profox-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke Sent: 20 July 2006 11:27 To: profox@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Escape codes - refresh my memory. The Epson escape sequence for draft mode is: Ascii: ESC ( n Dec: 27 40 n where n=1 to turn it on, 0 to turn it off In sending that to the printer from VFP would it be: CHR(27) + CHR(40) + "1" or CHR(27) + CHR(40) + CHR(49) with 49 being the ASCII code for "1" ?? Answers on the back of a used fifty to the usual address. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke@xxxxxxxxxxx -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@xxxxxxxxx Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.