|
Re: [PATCH] Views: Multiple keys: msg#00110db.couchdb.devel
On 7/23/08, Kevin Jackson <foamdino-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Although no one uses it, GET (and even HEAD) requests are not > >> forbidden from having bodies. (I think.) > > > > That does break the whole REST idea, though, doesn't it? > > > Yeah you'd lose 'buzzword compliance' at that point :) Yeah. I suppose a better argument is that I *know* that POST requests are not forbidden from having bodies. I don't see why doing it with a GET would make it any better. There are libraries out there that probably don't support a body with a GET request. No one uses it because it doesn't make sense to use it. -- Paul Bonser http://blog.paulbonser.com |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Views: Multiple keys: 00110, Kevin Jackson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Views: Multiple keys: 00110, Chris Anderson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Views: Multiple keysi: 00110, Kevin Jackson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Views: Multiple keys: 00110, Chris Anderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |