Re: Fwd: cjson.erl

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Michael Hendricks 
<michael-u4WEhoUc4zfYtjvyW6yDsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:09:40AM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:31:07PM +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>> > Bob and Damien agree it seems :)
>>
>> I'm starting to think that the interested parties should join the same
>> list! :p
>
> Do the Apache lists not allow posting by non-subscribers?

Yes, those posts must be moderated in.
(see http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#mail-moderate )

> I think the
> traditional way to handle this sort of conversation is to keep all
> relevant lists in the 'cc' field and the contributing parties in the
> 'to' field.  I've found that to work great for cross-pollination
> discussions like this.

Cross-posting discussions tend to get split up between lists sooner or later.

Maybe take this to the proper erlang.org mailing list...

  Bernd