Re: cjson.erl

On Jul 8, 2008, at 20:20, Michael Hendricks wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:09:40AM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:31:07PM +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> > > Bob and Damien agree it seems :)
> >
> > I'm starting to think that the interested parties should join the  
> > same
> > list! :p
>
> Do the Apache lists not allow posting by non-subscribers?  I think the
> traditional way to handle this sort of conversation is to keep all
> relevant lists in the 'cc' field and the contributing parties in the
> 'to' field.  I've found that to work great for cross-pollination
> discussions like this.

This emerged from a private conversation with Joe and he
pulled in Bob. I asked for permission to do the CC thing, but
haven't heard back yet and I don't want to go forward and
make their email addresses public without getting an OK
first. Until then, I'll do the forwarding.

Cheers
Jan
--