RE: [argouml-dev] Project compiler settings (was The plan for the 0.23.3 release)

Hello Tom!

I agree that consensus is the way to go here. I hope that you have
noticed in my proposed role description that the consensus approach is
possible to implement for this. If you want to formulate it differently
to emphasize that that would probably improve things further.

The problem has been that when I propose things my role as controller
and interpreter of the discussion kills it. This means that consensus
under my control is not working. You have several times expressed your
discontent with this.

As I see it, this is not for your CV, the purpose is to allow us to have
a more efficient discussion which will allow us to arrive at a better
result. The only way to achieve this is to have someone else monitoring
this discussion.


Withdrawing the proposal because I have not understood and you are tired
of explaining it is a consequence my role in this. As you are in control
of the discussion you can instead go ahead anyway. The fact that a
single one of the involved persons have not understood is not a problem.
As soon as you have considered that we have consensus about this, go
ahead!

        /Linus



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Morris [mailto:tfmorris@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: den 9 november 2006 00:00
> To: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Project compiler settings (was The plan for
the
> 0.23.3 release)
> 
> > Let me volunteer you (Tom Morris) for the role as Quality Engineer
...
> 
> Thanks for the offer, but I don't really need another title for my CV
at
> this point.  I am, of course, always happy to implement anything I
propose
> (and that offer is implicit in the proposal), but for decision making
I'd
> rather see us use a concensus approach rather than me (or anyone)
being
> sole
> arbiter.
> 
> > It still looks to me as you are requiring everyone that will be
> > developing ArgoUML from within Eclipse to use Eclipse 3.2.
> > Why not state that explicitly?
> 
> Actually I wasn't at all, but since I'm unable to make my proposal
> understood and it's taken far more time than it deserves, I'll
withdraw it.
> 
> Tom
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx