|
es] 10/07/05: Do we belong on bike paths?: msg#00153culture.transportation.humanpowered.trikes
I don't know why trikes wouldn't belong on bike paths. On my recent American Lung Association of Washington 3 day TREK I rode marvelous bike paths (riding into Victoria B.C.) and passed many walkers - all friendly, happy folks with a friendly wave. The only incident on one of the bike paths were three horses and riders coming from the opposite direction. I pulled over to the side as far as I could get, sat quietly (clearly the horses were not used to trikes) and chatted with the riders as they passed... the only thing I will do differently next time is wait longer before pedaling out again.... as I started off, I heard one of the horses make a bit of a fuss behind me. I would not take a trike on a "Walkers Path" ... but didn't mind walkers on a 'Bike Path"... Annie Message: 1 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 08:34:50 -0400 From: "Jules D. Zalon" <jzalon@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [trikes] 10/07/05: Do we belong on bike paths? To: <trikes@xxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <018a01c5cb3b$fa331d50$6701a8c0@jules> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I don't want to sound like a heretic, but I wonder if trikes belong on bike paths at all. And whether the term"bike path" isn't a misnomer anyway. It is often used interchangeably with rail trail, isn't it? My beloved GTO is 36 inches wide; my DFs, only 18. But even that understates the difference, because you can use body English on a DF to weave around an obstacle or walker when passing on a narrow path, something you can't do on a trike. I read somewhere that the minimum width of a one-way "bike path" is 6 feet; two-way width is 10, but often is only 8. But walkers often walk 2-abreast, and even if they anticipate being passed by an 18" wide bike, the idea of being passed by a trike probably never enters their minds. Therefore, they won't be thinking that they must allow all that much room on the path for a trike. So the very thing that protects us on the roads from cars overtaking us [the novelty of seeing these unusual contraptions] puts walkers in danger, because they don't have eyes in back of their heads. So I'll just keep riding the roads, and leave the paths to more "narrow"-minded cyclists. Jules. "Download your pictures for free at ftp://www.ihpva.org/incoming/" trikes mailing list - trikes@xxxxxxxxx http://www.ihpva.org/mailman/listinfo/trikes %(disclaimer)s |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Ang: Bells horns, etc: 00153, Mark Garvey |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Encycleopedia: 00153, Dave Franzen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bells n Horns...i: 00153, Leo R. Guajardo, II |
| Next by Thread: | Re: es] 10/07/05: Do we belong on bike paths?: 00153, Moz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |