|
The Anti-Semitic Wrath of Rome: msg#00017culture.templar.rosemont
The Anti-Semitic Wrath of Rome http://www.u.arizona.edu/~shaked/Tunisia/meet1.html Rome wiped out most of the history of Carthage and the history of the relationship Carthage had with the Jews of the world. The Maccabees made a treaty with Rome when they learned they had destroyed the revival of one of the largest cities of its time. The Maccabees loathed the Hellenization of the Jews and I suspect introduced the worship of YHWH that came in with the reforms of Hezikiah and Joash, via Jeremiah and Baruch. There was a false covenant produced so as to abolish the Egyptican and Phoenician influence in Judaic worship. Many of Moses' objects of worship were eradicated by the Scribes of Jaramiah much after the fact. John (and thus Jesus) represented child sacrifice that was popular in Carthage. Jesus is child sacrifice, while John is the reformation and abololition of this practice as Melicertes. The point is, Rome was intent on wiping out the Simitic Carthaginians and their realtionship with the Semitic Jews, especially in Jerusalem, as the teaching of John Melicertes was found all over the world, the many aspects of Horus-Melicertes united into one teaching that appealed to Jews, Greeks, and Celts alike, not to mention Carthaginian refugees. This is why Paul has his Romanized Jesus turn on the Jews, Moses, Horus, and the Celts, whom his army would murder for the next two thousand years. The Maccabean Queen, Berenice became the consort of emperor Titus who resuced her from the revolt in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. Some say she became his wife. She would have loathed to see the Nazarites come into power in the temple, which they did, she and her brother taking the oath of the Nazarites to appease a growing rebellion that gathered around John the Baptist the 'King of Jerusalem'. There is said to have been two Carthages, was one of them Jerusalem, also called Tarshish? Jon Presco "So ended the Third Punic War. Of all the Semitic states and cities that had flourished in the world five centuries before only one little country remained free under native rulers. This was Judea, which had liberated itself from the Seleucids and was under the rule of the native Maccabean princes. By this time it had its Bible almost complete, and was developing the distinctive traditions of the Jewish world as we know it now." The trade of the world was in Semitic hands. Tyre, Sidon, the great mother cities of the Phoenician coast, had thrown out colonies that grew at last to even greater proportion in Spain, Sicily and Africa. Carthage, founded before 800 B.C., had risen to a population of more than a million. It was for a time the greatest city on earth. Its ships went to Britain and out into the Atlantic. They may have reached Madeira. We have already noted how Hiram co-operated with Solomon to build ships on the Red Sea for the Arabian and perhaps for the Indian trade. In the time of the Pharaoh Necho, a Phoenician expedition sailed completely round Africa. . The battle of Zama ended this Second Punic War. Carthage capitulated; she surrendered Spain and her war fleet; she paid an enormous indemnity and agreed to give up Hannibal to the vengeance of the Romans. But Hannibal escaped and fled to Asia where later, being in danger of falling into the hands of his relentless enemies, he took poison and died. 5 For fifty-six years Rome and the shorn city of Carthage were at peace. And meanwhile Rome spread her empire over confused and divided Greece, invaded Asia Minor, and defeated Antiochus III, the Seleucid monarch, at Magnesia in Lydia. She made Egypt, still under the Ptolemies, and Pergamum and most of the small states of Asia Minor into "Allies," or, as we should call them now, "protected states." 6 Meanwhile Carthage, subjugated and enfeebled, had been slowly regaining something of her former prosperity. Her recovery revived the hate and suspicion of the Romans. She was attacked upon the most shallow and artificial of quarrels (149 B.C.), she made an obstinate and bitter resistance, stood a long siege and was stormed (146 B.C.). The street fighting, or massacre, lasted six days; it was extraordinarily bloody, and when the citadel capitulated only about fifty thousand of the Carthaginian population remained alive out of a quarter of a million. They were sold into slavery, and the city was burnt and elaborately destroyed. The blackened ruins were ploughed and sown as a sort of ceremonial effacement. 7 So ended the Third Punic War. Of all the Semitic states and cities that had flourished in the world five centuries before only one little country remained free under native rulers. This was Judea, which had liberated itself from the Seleucids and was under the rule of the native Maccabean princes. By this time it had its Bible almost complete, and was developing the distinctive traditions of the Jewish world as we know it now. It was natural that the Carthaginians, Ph?nicians and kindred peoples dispersed about the world should find a common link in their practically identical language and in this literature of hope and courage. To a large extent they were still the traders and bankers of the world. The Semitic world had been submerged rather than replaced. 8 Jerusalem, which has always been rather the symbol than the centre of Judaism, was taken by the Romans in 65 B.C.; and after various vicissitudes of quasi-independence and revolt was besieged by them in 70 A.D. and captured after a stubborn struggle. The Temple was destroyed. A later rebellion in 132 A.D. completed its destruction, and the Jerusalem we know to-day was rebuilt later under Roman auspices. A temple to the Roman god, Jupiter Capitolinus, stood in the place of the Temple, and Jews were forbidden to inhabit the city CARTHAGE: (print this article) By : Richard Gottheil Samuel Krauss ARTICLE HEADINGS: Josephus. In the Bible and the Talmud. Jews in Carthage. Under the Arabs. Ancient city and republic in northern Africa; of special interest to Jews on account of the Phenico-Semitic origin of its inhabitants, its government under the suffetes, recalling the "shofeṭim" (judges) among the Hebrews, and on account of the religion of the inhabitants. The city, called ("New City") in native inscriptions (Lidzbarski, "Nordsemitische Epigraphik," i. 365), is mentioned in Jewish writings since Talmudic times only as ("Ḳarthigini"), a name equivalent to the Byzantine form Kαρϑαγένη and in agreement with the Syriac (Payne Smith, "Thes. Syr." cols. 3744, 3765), the Greek form Kαρχηδών being found with the latter. Notwithstanding the peculiar form, perhaps chosen with reference to the founder Dido ( + γυνή, "Woman-City"), the Hebrew word certainly designates Carthage in Africa, not Cartagena in Spain. Later Jewish chronicles, which make the founding of Carthage contemporaneous with David, use the variants "Ḳarṭagena" (Yuḥasin, ed. London, 236b), "Ḳarṭigini" (with ט instead of ח, as sometimes even in the Talmud; David Gans to the year 3882), "Ḳartini," and "Ḳartigni" ("Seder ha-Dorot," s.v. "David"), sometimes adding the curious remark that the Talmud refers to two cities of Carthage, which is, however, an erroneous conclusion. Josephus. Josephus Flavius writes Kαρχηδών like the Greeks. He says it is recorded in the public documents of Tyre that King Solomon built the Temple at Jerusalem 143 years and eight months before the Tyrians founded Carthage ("Contra Ap." i. § 17). Josephus intends to prove by this statement the antiquity of the Jewish people, drawing the same conclusions from Menander's account of the reign of Hiram, according to which Hiram came to the throne 155 years and eight months before the founding of Carthage, and the Temple was built in the twelfth year of his reign (ib. i. § 18). Through this computation Josephus refutes the grammarian Apion, who placed the exodus from Egypt at the time that the Phenicians founded Carthage (ib. ii. § 2). The Maccabean Judah formed a treaty with the Romans for the reason, among others, that he had heard that the Romans had vanquished the Carthaginians ("Ant." xii. 10, § 6; compare "B. J." ii. 16, § 4; vi. 6, § 2). Josephus does not say that any Jews lived at Carthage. In the Bible and the Talmud. Although Carthage is not mentioned in the Bible, modern scholars are inclined to identify the Biblical Tarshish with Carthage, since it is thus translated in the Septuagint, the Targum, and the Vulgate, Ezek. xxvii. 12. A unique statement in the Talmud, based probably on the legend of the emigration of the Girgashites, identifies Kenizzi (Gen. xv. 19) with Carthage (Yer. Sheb. 36b; Yer. Ḳid. 61d; Gen. R. xliv. 23). But a wide-spread rabbinical legend identifies the land of the Amazons with Carthage (Lev. R. xxvii. 1), or with Africa (Tamid 32b), in both instances agreeing with classical tradition. Carthage was considered one of the four largest cities of the Roman empire (Sifre, Num. 131; p. 47b, ed. Friedmann). An amora of the third century has the following curious sentence: "From Tyrus to Carthage Israel and his 'Father in heaven' are known; from Tyrus to the west and from Carthage to the east Israel and his God are not known" (Men. 110a); which is probably meant to indicate the extent of the Semitic race. Jews in Carthage. The fact that the Talmud mentions the Carthaginian teachers of the Law, R. Abba, R. Isaac, and R. Ḥana, proves that Jews were living in that city, although Frankel, without reason, takes it to mean an Armenian city ("Mebo," pp. 6b, 66a), and Kohut a Spanish city ("Aruch Completum," vii. 220). It is evident from the introduction to the work "Adversum Judæos," ascribed to Tertullian, that Jews were living in Carthage; and they are found still further west (Schürer, "Gesch." 3d ed., iii. 26, note 64). Münter ("Primordia Eccl. Afric." p. 165, Copenhagen, 1829) mentions a certain R. Jisschak (the one in the Talmud?). The Jews of Africa (see Africa) are often referred to in the correspondence between Jerome and Augustine; and in recent times there has been found in Gamart, near the city of Carthage, a great Jewish necropolis with many inscriptions in Latin (see Catacombs). From the conquest of Carthage by the Vandals (439) to the subjection of the latter by the Byzantines (533), the holy vessels from the Temple of Jerusalem, that had been taken from Rome, were kept in Carthage (Evagrius, "Scholasticus," Fragment iv. p., 17; Procopius, "Bellum. Vand." ii. § 9). The Jews then passed under the rule of Justinian, who instructed Solomon, the governor of Africa, to transform the synagogues as well as the churches of the Arians and the Donatists into orthodox churches (Novellæ, No. 37). Solomon, however, was soon compelled to flee from the rebellious Africans. Under the Arabs. In 692 the city was wrested from the Christians by Ḥasan, a general of the calif 'Abd al-Malik, and in 698 the Greeks were permanently driven from Carthage and Africa by Musa (Weil, "Gesch. der Chalifen," i. 478). Previous to this the Arabs had founded the city Ḳairwan, which became as important to the Jews as Carthage had been. Following Arabic writers, Parḥi defined the situation of Carthage as 36° latitude by 35° longitude ("Kaftor wa-Feraḥ," ed. Edelmann, 26b). The Carthaginians were Phoenicians, of Canaanite ancestry, who settled on the northeastern coast of what is now Tunisia. By the beginning of the Iron Age (c. 1200 B.C.), the Phoenicians had taken control of that part of the Levantine coast now occupied by northern Israel, Lebanon and Syria. The Phoenicians were known throughout the Mediterranean world as merchants, sailors and craftsmen. According to the Hebrew Bible, the Phoenician king Hiram of Tyre provided the Israelite king Solomon (c. 965-928 B.C.) with masons and architects to help build the Jerusalem Temple (1 Kings 5ff.). It was from the literate, Semitic-speaking Phoenicians, moreover, that the Greeks borrowed the alphabet?the direct ancestor of the alphabetic characters that you see before you.* No one knows exactly how the Phoenicians got to Carthage, where they settled among the Berbers, a semi-nomadic people who had been in North Africa since the fifth millennium B.C. According to the not- always-reliable Greek historian Timaeus (c. 356-260 B.C.), Carthage was founded in 814 B.C. by a Phoenician princess named Dido (who is called Elissa in Phoenician). Dido was the sister of Pygmalion, a king of Tyre who ruled a century after Hiram (this Pygmalion is not to be confused with the Pygmalion who fell in love with a statue that he himself had carved). When Pygmalion murdered Dido's husband, she gathered up the royal treasury and a group of supporters and headed off to nearby Cyprus. There she managed to attract more women to her group. She then headed out over the open sea to Carthage, a name which means "new city" in Phoenician. Dido and her band settled on a large hill called the Byrsa. According to Virgil's Aeneid (late first century B.C.), the local Berber chieftain told Dido that her people could have as much land as could be covered with a single oxhide (a form of monetary exchange in the ancient world). So the ingenious princess cut an oxhide into tiny strips and set them end to end, so that they girded the entire Byrsa hill. (In fact, the term "Byrsa" in Phoenician means citadel or fortress, which is probably how the hill actually got its name. The oxhide story may have arisen because the phonetic equivalents of "Byrsa" in both Greek and Latin mean hide?from which we derive our words "bourse," or stock market, and "purse.") We know little about Queen Dido's successors. Even though the Phoenicians transmitted the alphabet, virtually nothing of their literature and little of their history have survived. Most of what we know about them comes from 20th-century archaeological excavations or from ancient Egyptian, biblical, Assyrian, Greek and Roman sources. The name "Phoenicians," for instance, was not what they called themselves but what the Greeks called them; the word means dark red and refers to the royal purple dye that Phoenicians extracted from murex shells. Some scholars believe that they were mercenary traders with little culture or literature of their own. Others are convinced that the literature existed but was obliterated when their civilization was destroyed and assimilated by the Romans? whether in the Levant or in Carthage. The existence of a Phoenician, and particularly Carthaginian, literature, is hinted at in Roman sources, though only in the briefest of references. The Carthaginians were adventurers. They loved to travel and trade all over the Mediterranean?and as such they came into conflict with Greek and then Roman expansionists. Possessing superior ships, the Phoenicians sailed from the eastern Mediterranean through the Strait of Gibraltar and beyond, looking not only for gold and tin but also for the murex shells from which they produced the dye for their famed Tyrian purple robes, so admired by the Romans, among others. Carthaginian explorers certainly sailed beyond the strait and up the Iberian coast, possibly reaching England. One remarkable expedition led by Hanno the Navigator around the middle of the fifth century B.C. seems to have set out to circumnavigate the African continent from the west?this at a time when the size of Africa was not known. Amazingly, Hanno's account of his voyage survives. Originally written in Punic,** the account was later translated into Greek and Latin, but only the Greek version is extant. The Periplus [literally, "Sailing Around"] of Hanno recounts how Hanno sailed beyond the Strait of Gibraltar, where the Phoenicians had established Punic colonies both in North Africa and southern Spain. In Lixus, not far from modern Tangiers, Morocco, he recruited translators who knew something of the tongues spoken beyond the strait and around the western coast of Africa. Hanno sailed down the African coast, probably as far as the Senegal River, which forms the border of modern Senegal and Mauritania. Hanno's party appears to have traveled inland along the river, where they entered the tropical rain forest and encountered fantastic creatures they had never seen before, like hippopotami and crocodiles. Hanno's account reads like a script for an Indiana Jones movie: The Carthaginians move cautiously through the eerie, thick forest, as barbarous natives play flutes and beat drums in the distance. Suddenly Hanno comes across strange savages: The biggest number of them were females, with hairy bodies which our Lixite interpreters called gorillas. Chasing them we could not catch any of the males, because all of them escaped by being able to climb steep cliffs and (by) defending themselves with whatever was available; but we caught three females who bit and scratched their captors and they did not want to follow them. So we had to kill them and flay them, and we brought their skins to Carthage. It seems likely that Hanno did indeed scuffle with a family of what we, too, call gorillas. Our term "gorilla," which refers to the large anthropoid apes of west equatorial Africa, only goes back to 1847 when it was coined by Thomas Staughton Savage, an American clergyman and naturalist. Savage was a missionary sent to Africa on behalf of the Protestant Episcopal Church of Cromwell, Connecticut. Where did Savage get the term "gorilla"? He had read it in a 1797 English translation of the Periplus of Hanno! Upon returning to Carthage, Hanno had the gorilla skins displayed and offered to the gods in a special open-air cultic precinct in Carthage, which is known today as the Tophet. According to the Hebrew Bible, the Tophet was a place just south of ancient Jerusalem where erring Israelites sacrificed their children by burning them. The Judahite king Josiah (640-609 B.C.) is said to have destroyed the Tophet "so that no one would make a son or daughter pass through fire as an offering" (2 Kings 23:10). Did the ancient Phoenicians, in Carthage and elsewhere,* sacrifice living children to their gods? For the past two decades this has been the subject of heated scholarly debates. (See "An Odyssey Debate: Were Living Children Sacrificed to the Gods?") Although some French and Tunisian scholars have argued that children were not sacrificed in large numbers at Carthage, the evidence is against them. Certainly in ancient times the Phoenicians had a reputation for sacrificing children. The third-century B.C. Greek author Kleitarchos was quoted by a later source as writing: "Out of reverence for Kronos [the Greek equivalent of Ba'al Hammon, the chief god of the Punic pantheon], the Phoenicians, and especially the Carthaginians, whenever they seek to obtain some great favor, vow one of their children, burning it as a sacrifice to the deity, if they are especially eager to gain success."(1) The Carthage Tophet first came to modern attention in 1921, when a local official caught an antiquities trafficker removing decorated stelae from the site. A few years later the Tophet was bought and excavated by the French explorer/adventurer Count Byron Khun de Prorok, who uncovered numerous burial urns containing charred human remains. "This is a dreadful period of human degeneracy," de Prorok wrote, "that we are now unearthing in the famous temple of Tanit [the consort of Ba'al Hammon]."(2) De Prorok later recalled that he had found "six thousand funerary urns" in the sanctuary of Tanit, "where the little children of Carthage made their great, but unwilling, gift of life for the sake of the city's security."(3) **Referring to the Phoenicians?and their language?in the western Mediterranean, the term "Punic" derives from the Latin adjective punicus, a transliteration of the Greek Phoinikos (Phoenician), which derives from the Greek word for purple (as in purple dye). Major excavations of the Tophet were conducted in the mid- to late 1970s by Lawrence Stager (then with the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, and now at Harvard) and a team that included the author. Stager concluded that child sacrifice took place on the site "almost continuously for a period of nearly 600 years," from the mid-eighth to mid-second centuries B.C.(4) The Carthage Tophet is a huge precinct of at least 54,000 square feet. Between 400 and 200 B.C. alone, as many as 20,000 urns containing the remains of children offered to the gods may have been deposited in this sanctuary. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Elisha the Female Savior: 00017, Jon Presco |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | The Jewess Queen of the Berbers: 00017, Jon Presco |
| Previous by Thread: | Elisha the Female Saviori: 00017, Jon Presco |
| Next by Thread: | The Jewess Queen of the Berbers: 00017, Jon Presco |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |