Atlanteans

In the Oera Linda book, Jon and the Frisians are credited with 
amazing sea voyages and the founding of Ionia, that was named after 
Jon the Navigator and Sea Lord. There is a rebellion against the 
Frisian Folk Mother, Rosamond. There was a queen of the Cimri 
(Cambrian) named Rosamonde who is said to have married Pharamond to 
found the Sicambrian Franks. The Cimri settled near Jutland.

Jon Presco

 http://all-ez.com/frisian-inka.htm 
    

Were the Shang and the Inca Really Frisian/Magyar? 


Our history begins in the north Atlantic, outside the Pillars of 
Heracles in 10,507 bce, or 193 years after the final sinking of 
Atlantis. This global disaster also inundated the northern portions 
of the Frisian empire. They were no-doubt the high civilization 
referred to by the Greeks as the Hyperboreans. These people were 
among the earliest of mariners and navigators, later teaching the 
Phoenicians their knowledge of the seas. Two of their greatest 
admirals, Nef-tunis and Inka, were gathered with their vast fleet to 
decide what to do next. Some decided to go with the Sea-King Nef-
tunis, later worshipped as Neptune, to found Tyre in honor of Thor, 
and maybe become mercenaries and hire their ships to the Phoenicians 
and Egyptians. Most decided to join Admiral Inka on a voyage west to 
settle in any high places that remained above water in old Atlantis. 
I think the true date for the founding of Tyre will verify the early 
date for the Inka fleet to the Andes, not the current guess of 2350 
bc, that was based on the later founding of a Phoenician temple to 
Melkarth, or Heracles, but closer to 10,500 bc. 
Besides the Frisians, with Inka were many Finns and Hungarians, 
including the Magyars. Like Tyre, the Frisians also founded Athens, 
Tunis and Cadiz, and many other ports long before the Phoenicians. 
The ships of those days had sails, as well as rowers. Much of their 
success was a result of their knowledge of the ocean currents and 
winds, as much as geography. It was necessary to exchange rower 
crews often when time was crucial, as when transporting perishables. 
So most of the ports of the ancient world had communities of 
Frisians. This was certainly true in Sumeria, where their remnants 
still worshipped as gods these ancient Frisian admirals, eg Inka was 
worshipped there as Enki. 

Oera Linda Book 

>From Cayce we are given the date of the sinking of Poseidonia, the 
last of Atlantis, at 10,700 bc. from 'Oera Linda Book', we are told 
the fleet of Inka sailed for the Americas 193 years after that, or 
at 10,507 bc. So shortly after this early date the high civilization 
of the Inka had the fleet to become a colonizing power itself, 
spreading their influence north into Yucatan and Ohio, and much 
later into China as the Shang. It appears that a second wave of 
migration and influence of the Inka spread north into both areas of 
Mexico and Ohio circa 3100 bc, joining the earlier remnant from the 
Inka and Atlanteans already there, and the newly arrived lost tribes 
to become the mound builders in Ohio. I'm sure few will believe this 
hypothesis, but it may well be the most accurate historical account 
written in ages. 

The Oera Linda Book made it seem like many ships joined Admiral 
Inka. Other things Cayce reported suggests that the fleet was used 
from its South American base to contact and settle Yucatan, Ohio, 
and Egypt. This explains the lost time between the sinking of 
Poseidonia long before the Atlanteans arrived in Egypt, with the 
Inka. I think it was a few hundred years. Similarly, I think its 
possible, maybe likely that the Shang originated from their colony 
in South America to settle and conquer China. 

>From the 'Oera Linda Book', we are given dates from an event, called 
the sinking or inundation of 'Aldland' and 'Atland'. There were 
generations of authors within that Frisian family. Personally, from 
the history given, later descendants confused the dates for the 
sinking of Atlantis. They are among the earliest nations that we 
know of, back to the mythic age of heros and gods on earth. They 
founded Athenia, by their earth-mother Ny-Hellenia, known as 
Minerva. The Greeks were illiterate goat-herds in those days. The 
Frisian Minnos purchased and colonized Knossus Crete, becoming our 
Midas. Its likely that the Frisian name, already corrupted from 
Freya, became further corrupted into Phrygian. The colonies of the 
Frisians at Crete, Tunisia, Asia Minor, including Troy, were later 
called Phrygian. This may as well have been corrupted into 
Phoenician. 

Its said that most of the rivers and geographical features of Europe 
bear names derived from the Magyar core, either called Scythian or 
Saka based. The Celts were earlier named Cimmerian, and seem to 
share much of the religious beliefs and language of the Sumerians 
and Phoenicians, including worship of the sun god named Baal or Bel. 
It would appear that the hordes from the Altai region spread across 
Europe, Asia, and north Africa, not only in the middle ages, but in 
waves for thousands of years before that. Thousands of years of 
history has them located in that central region, and demonstrates 
that this cradle gave rise to countless millions of these people - 
yet some posit that they originated elsewhere, even India was 
mentioned. Are we certain which race they are? Mongols are thought 
to be of the red race, but they speak of white Huns. Perhaps they 
were originally yellow or brown? After thousands of years of 
successive waves of them plundering and raping across the old world, 
no doubt the genetics and bloodlines of every region bears their 
imprint. Much suggests that the later waves were conquering their 
own kinsmen that had arrived earlier, and settled down into a less 
nomadic life. 

They colonized the Indus and eastern India, in an age when Suez was 
a strait. Suez spelled backwards is Zeus. A Frisian navigator was a 
friend of Krishna, who died in 3104 bc, before Menes of the first 
dynasty of Egypt, and prior to the Harrapan culture. Much suggests 
that the Frisian empire was greater and more extensive before 3449 
bc. They refer to the Trojan War later in their history, yet Cayce 
dates it to 5500 bc. The Greeks and the west got so much from the 
Frisians, especially the doctrine of freedom. Its like reading old 
English, so many words are similar. Like Wr-ald, their creator, we 
call world - the great spirit of nature. Irtha is our earth. They 
had the habit of writing their laws, formulas, and history upon 
their stone walls. The manner of writing and numbers was done on the 
wheel of the wr-ald, a pie with six pieces or spokes. Its no wonder 
that the Inca had such good laws, and the Aymara and Quechua loved 
the Inca so much. When pure, the Frisians had no idols, and had no 
slaves. Finding the writing on the wall will eventually prove the 
identity of the Inca. The palaces of the supreme Inca at Cuzco were 
surrounded by walls. Each dynasty seemed to build a new palace, 
rather than use the ones of their forefathers. A few of these 
palaces survive, and the walls remain on many of those in ruin. So 
its important that these walls be examined for inscriptions. 

Inka and the Ayar Brothers .. more 

This Andean legend link is about the Ayar brothers, almost surely 
describing the Magyar. The Ayar Brothers arrived right after the 
flood, say the legends. 

"The second legend is known as that of the "Ayar Brothers" and 
indicates that from three windows in the Tamput'oqo Mountain in 
Pakariqtanpu about 25 kms. (15.5 miles) south of Qosqo came out four 
brothers. They were Ayar Manko (Manko Qhapaq), Ayar Kachi, Ayar Auka 
and Ayar Uchu; every one along with his wife. They went towards the 
Wanakauri Mountain and then to Qosqo where just the women and Manko 
Qhapaq arrived founding the city in the name of Teqsi Wiraqocha and 
the Sun." 

It has occurred to me that the Frisian fleet of Inka would have 
required a port and docks. They were serious about navigation and 
sea trade, knowing that the greatness of the Frisian nation was 
based on its command of the oceans. Its almost a given that they 
built at least one port on the Pacific, more likely several, with 
Chile and Ecuador likely places to look. 

The Frisians had advanced metalurgy that will astound our scientists 
if they find relics, like iron crossbows mounted like cannons on 
ships, plus alloys of tempered brass and silver, circa 10,000 bce. 
With the Humboldt current along the coast, even good sailors will 
lose ships. The water being so cold there, should have helped to 
preserve the wrecks. Plus ships with masts and rows of oars should 
be easy to notice, and won't be mistaken for more recent vessels. It 
seems likely that there were islands that may have served as ports 
off the coast of Chile, and the inlets of Patagonia. 

Tiwanaku was hoary with age when the Inka/Enki arrived. We can only 
credit them with a revival of the Tiwanaku culture, that was in 
progress by the influx of Atlanteans. Their legends admit as much. 
The Enki culture made heavy use of oracles, and venerated women, and 
the Frisian earth-mother no doubt giving rise to the Pachamama 
belief. 

Consider for a moment how many centuries or millennias would have 
been required to develope the horticulture and hybridation of over 
200 varieties of potatoes, and the many other food plants that 
originated in South America. The same appears true for the strange 
animal species, like the Ilama and Alpaca, apparent cross-breeds 
between camels and sheep. Even the stingerless honeybee, that 
appears nowhere else but the Yucatan. Many legends of the Andean 
people tell of their ancestors remembering the uplift of the Andes. 
Many of the mountains have terraces so high that nothing will grow 
there. We can only assume they were farmed before the Andes 
uplifted, or were used by survivors of the great flood until the 
waters subsided. The 10,507 bc date becomes easier to accept. Andean 
peanuts made their way to China, and lacquer technology was brought 
to Mexico from China before recorded history. The experts state the 
Americas were peopled from Asia because of the similarity to 
Mongolians, instead of realizing that the Mongolians may have came 
from America in prehistoric times, since both are of the red race 
native to this hemisphere. 

Dr. McGovern in his "Jungle Paths and Inca Ruins" mentions an early 
Spanish chronicler named Fernando de Montesinos, whom he ridicules 
as a great liar, because the Inca history that he relates is so 
different from what the experts want to believe. Yet his later 
conclusions very much support what Montesinos reported. 

Dr McGovern states, "It is only of the last hundred years of the 
Inca Empire that we can claim definite knowledge." 

"The later history of the Empire is fairly clear, but what of the 
early history which is shrouded in fable? Here, where the historians 
give us only contradictory legends - self-contradictory, and in 
contradiction to the facts brought to light by recent excavations - 
we must tread warily. We must, in fact, start all over again, 
accepting little or nothing that the historians give us unless this 
is supported by outside evidence. Here lies an enormous field for 
research. If carefully carried out, this will solve the secret of a 
mysterious race. It will indirectly throw much light upon the whole 
history of mankind."

"It is surprising how little excavation has been done here in the 
Highlands. The excavations on the coast have revealed much. It is 
probable that careful work in the Sierra will be even more 
illuminating; yet even Cuzco has up to this time [1928] been little 
disturbed by the excavator's spade." 

"Gradually one is forced to the conclusion that the four hundred 
years given us by the chroniclers for the whole course of the Inca 
Empire is too short to account for all of the developments of Cuzco 
architecture." 

Montesinos stated that : 
"Manko Kapak had ninety-nine successors, giving the Inca Empire a 
long and varied history [dating back to long before the Christian 
era]." 

INCA PREHISTORY FROM McGOVERN'S, 'JUNGLE PATHS AND INCA RUINS' 

Study of Montesinos' Work .. in Adobe pdf (Montesinos was a Spaniard 
who arrived in Peru in 1628 and devoted the rest of his life to the 
compilation of a comprehensive and chronological history and 
prehistory of the Peruvians) 

It seems modern historians date the Inca Empire only as far back as 
the reformer emperor, or to that of the second Manko Kapak. 
Architecture at Cuzco alone, shows at least three distinct phases of 
development, from megalithic to classic Inca. 

Sailing to the Amazon from Europe or Cape Verde was an easy crossing 
using the Gulf Stream. It was access to the west coast of South 
America from Europe or Africa that presents great difficulty to a 
sailor, both from the southern and the northern approach. It was 
approached from the Pacific by the central counter current the 
safest and most direct, otherwise the sailor required a large voyage 
looping into the Pacific, to reapproach the coast well south of his 
intended destination. The Humboldt current is fierce and unrelenting 
as it hugs the west coast in its normal south to north flow. Thats 
why its almost certain every early arrival across the Pacific used 
the Tonga route, or arrived on the 5 to 7 year reversal of the 
Humboldt current. In fact the Amazon crossing was the easiest of 
all, its fresh muddy water is unmistakable 200 miles out in the 
Atlantic to any vessel brought by the currents and trade winds from 
Europe and northwest Africa. The mouth of the river is 100 miles 
wide and easy to make with meagre navigational skills. The early 
navigators employing both sails and oars, would have been better 
able to go upstream against the current of the Amazon, than modern 
vessels up to the age of steam in the 19th century. Like Noah, the 
use of birds by ancient navigators was widespread and common. When 
released, the birds would fly high enough to see over the horizon, 
and the mariners would note the direction that they flew to plot a 
course to the nearest landfall. Wise navigators also learned much 
from the movement of clouds, and the change in the orientation of 
waves, to know of a landmass over the horizon. This old wisdom is 
still employed by mariners of the south Pacific. 

We should consider that the Frisian fleet may have arrived via the 
straits of Magellan. This is an interesting area of mountains and 
fijords, very much like Scandinavia. It would not be surprising if 
we found that part of the passage was man-made canals. All of the 
ships in the world could be hidden among the inlets. I think its 
possible that ancient Frisian ports could have existed in this area. 

Below see the link identifying a Frisian origin for the Araucanians 
of Chile, from the writings of Dom Alonso, or Alfonso de Ercilla, in 
the late 16th century. 

Frisian of Chile Named Glaura in late 16th c .. from Wilkins 
'Secrets of Old South America' 

"My name is Glaura. I was born in a propitious hour. The daughter I 
am of a good cacique, Quilacura, of the noble blood of the old 
Frisians." [p. 392]

Alonso de Ercilla's historical epic poetry published in 1574, 
titled "LA ARAUCANA" 

Sorry, but I've only found it in Spanish so far. It reveals the 
Frisian identity of the Araucana people of Chile. 

"LA ARAUCANA" 

"LA ARAUCANA" 

"LA ARAUCANA" 

Specific quotes 

Given Frisian accounts, and ancient chronicles of the Americas, its 
likely that they had regular contact or colonies in the western 
hemisphere. 

Some Glimpses of Chile (1991) 

Jim Bailey's 'Sailing to Paradise', quoting Flavius Josephus, 
concerning the second exodus from Sumeria : 

"From that hour, therefore, they were dispersed through their 
diversity of languages and founded colonies everywhere, each group 
occupying the country that they lit upon and to which God led them, 
so that every continent was peopled by them, the interior and the 
seaboard alike; while some crossed the sea on shipboard and settled 
in the islands. Of the nations some still preserve the names which 
were given them by their founders, some have changed them, while yet 
others have modified them to make them more intelligible to their 
neighbors." 

Next consider the fertile crescent of Mesopotamia, during the reign 
of Sargon the Great, of uncertain age, many think circa 2350 bc. 
Here, we have the land of Shinar, to which the survivors of the 
great flood flocked, as well as to Armenia. A mysterious land of 
many nations and tongues, brought together by the need of sustenance 
and protection, by this empire's sophisticated sciences of 
irrigation, agriculture, the arts and metalurgy. Much of their high 
culture may have been brought by the Frisian navigator's, who 
exchanged exhausted crews here. 

After many centuries of enjoying the high bronze age, Sargon was in 
a crisis situation, they were out of tin. His army now had inferior 
copper weapons and armament. Anxious that his war-like neighbors 
would conquer and absorb his empire, he sent out a fleet in search 
of sources of tin. The date of the tin fleet is as uncertain as the 
reign of Sargon the Great. Some think it centuries earlier than 2350 
bc, and some later. Its interesting that 2350 bc is also given as 
the date for the founding of Tyre, but those establishing this date 
based it on the building of the Temple of Melkarth [Heracles], and 
were not aware that the Frisians had preceded the Phoenicians at 
Tyre. Even though Heracles and Thor were more the deities of the 
Frisian than the Phoenician. So the actual founding of Tyre could 
have been thousands of years before. 

Jim Bailey says around 3100 bc, 'many Sumerian refugees went off to 
America', they may have been the sea people called the Enki from 
Eridu. This is the same global disaster time when Krishna dies, and 
the Kali Yuga begins, the Peruvians migrate to Yucatan, when the 
Maya began, the Harappan culture begins, the Sumerian homeland 
destroyed by a storm, the old kingdom begins in Egypt, and a tidal 
wave hits Ireland. [reference p 124] 

[note symbols above and to left of the eye on the image called 
Cabeza above] 
Now refer to the potter's marks from the Shang Dynasty of China, 
which are basically identical to that of the 'eastern Semites' 
[which could be Frisian or Magyar]. It may be possible to date and 
identify the location and potter that created cabeza! 

I'm finding most potter's marks of China were 4 or 6 characters. Our 
cabeza seems to have 5, but its said that sometimes a 5 or 7th was 
used. The same coding may be used on Cabeza, with the first four 
symbols giving the date, city, and the potter, and the fifth for who 
it was made. 

I would add, that if these are indeed potter's marks and dateable 
from the Shang Dynasty coding protocol, then we have the 'holy 
grail' of diffusion, and it leads us to think that both China and 
Bolivia were invaded by Frisians and Magyars, who may have sold tin 
to Sargon. Or persisting legends among the sailors of Sumeria led 
the later tin fleet to South America's deposits in Bolivia. 

Assuming Cabeza has Shang Dynasty potter's mark. I repeat, its seems 
unlikely that a beaten people would have exquisite and expensive 
items made and transported from China to Bolivia, so logically we 
are looking upon the victors, the 'Shang' [read Frisian/Magyar]. 
Cabeza is not something for export - its portrays a real man. Its 
not something a visitor would carry from China, and casually lose in 
Bolivia. Its likely this man lived near Tiwanaku, which includes all 
of its suburbs, like Pokotia, and Puna, and the Island of the Sun. 
Until proven otherwise I'm inclined to believe that the Shang and 
the Inca were the same people, with a face possibly like cabeza, 
which is just as important, if not more so, than Fuente Magna. Its 
the perfect proof, when the potter's marks are confirmed as Shang-
like. The potter may have been a Shang countryman operating in 
Bolivia, where they went by a closer name for their nation, the 
Inka - which over thousands of years may have been corrupted to 
Inca. [Cayce spelled it Inka] 

Anyone with eyes* can see that the code has an 80% correspondence on 
their chart of code symbols. It has been a while since I entertained 
the idea of the Inca being either Aryan or Chinese. The Shang were 
not Chinese either. The most likely candidate for both remains 
Frisian/Magyar or Sumerians. The presence of the marks has been 
confirmed by an onsite archaeologist. [* This assumes that you are 
using a 17 inch monitor, with .28 dot pitch resolution, with a 
decent video card.] 

review: 'Sailing to Paradise' 
p343 
Attached is a text page discussing the potters marks being the same 
between the Shang Dynasty and eastern mediterranean people. It 
validates much of what I have proposed about cabeza, and the 
Frisian/Sumerian connection between China and Bolivia. This artifact 
is pivotal to understanding these early colonial interchanges. Its a 
major discovery waiting to be recognized as such. 

We find that the cabeza looks 'Chinese' to us today. It may be that 
the Enki people passed on these looks to the Chinese at the time of 
the Shang invasion. Its unlikely that the conquerors portrayed the 
losers in terracotta, and brought their representation to their 
other colony in Bolivia. So, there may have been hordes of them to 
change the look of the masses of China. Bailey mentions that our 
name 'China' may have started from the Sumerian word 'telechinia'. 
Its fascinating that the cabeza may allow us a look at the Inka 
voyagers that produced the Fuente Magna and Pokotia monoliths, and 
at the same time through potter's marks allow us to date the time 
accurately. If not now, then future archaeologists will pin the date 
down, probably no later than 1900 bc to 1600 bc for Cabeza. This 
seems to be close to what the linguists reckon when considering the 
FM scripts. However, the presence of cuneiform causes me to think it 
related to the Inka and Magyars of a much earlier time. 

Its possible that a high ranking indigenous Chinese may have booked 
passage to Bolivia and relocated to Tiwanaku, particularly if they 
were colonies of the same nation, that I propose was the Inka/Enki, 
of the Frisians originally. The legends, historical record, 
religion, and linguistic evidence for Sumerian presence in Bolivia 
is without question. When more complete excavations are done, we can 
expect more wonderful surprises from this high bronze age culture. I 
would expect lots of wonderful bronzes, and possibly some chariots, 
even though the terrain doesnt favor their extensive use. There are 
only a few nations that had high bronze age technology at the 
horizon that the Shang entered China. The Frisians, and later the 
Sumerians are the most likely candidate that I can find. The 
chariots and high arts and quality bronzes arrived in China long 
before the 1550 bc date given for the start of Shang culture. So the 
1720 bc date or earlier is credible for their initial settlements 
along the coast and the lower stretches of the Yellow River. 

Besides these are all side issues, when considering the Shang and 
cabeza relationship, if the potter's codes can be read from 
Shang/Western Semitic coding protocols. 

On the page Bailey cites the book detailing these 54 codes and their 
protocols for reading them. A better source I think for 
confirmation, and for reading the coded information is the late 
Professor Chang. Professor Chang's books may shine light on the 
potters codes on cabeza. He has two books, 'Archaeology of Ancient 
China' and 'Symbols' . 

The term 'western semites' used by Bailey, was slow for me to 
connect with Frisian/Magyars and Sumeria, but I'm convinced now that 
the two are one and the same. The fact that 49 of 52 potters codes 
were identical between the Shang and these people is very convincing 
evidence linking them. The Sumerian and the Magyar may be one and 
the same people. 

My point is not that the cabeza is an Inca artifact, certainly not, 
as commonly understood now. I'm saying that it has potter's marks 
that four of five symbols are identical to those used by the Shang 
Dynasty of China, and 'western semites', which I contend are 
Magyars/Sumerians. From Fuente Magna and Pokotia we know that there 
was early Magyar or Sumerian contact with Bolivia. We dont know how 
long Sumeria maintained contact with, or settled in Bolivia. Cabeza 
seems to be connected to later contact with China. Many experts 
believe that the Shang invaders of China were Sumerians also. In 
fact there are some that say that the time of Sargon was closer to 
2230 bc. The high bronze age was carried to China long before 1550 
bc. Its possible that the Inka or the Sumerians started arriving in 
both places as early as 2230 bc as peaceful teachers, merchants and 
artisans, and increased in numbers and strength through the 
centuries down to 1720 bc. The Shang Dynasty lasted in China until 
about 1150 bc. We have no way of knowing if cabeza represents a 
Sumerian or a Chinese who relocated during the time both were 
colonies of Frisia/Sumeria. The Inca of 1470 ad may be different 
foreigners, or possibly descendents of these earlier colonies, but 
I'm inclined to think the latter. 

Cabeza could be of pivotal importance in connecting both as colonies 
of the Frisians and Magyars, or if found to be later, by their 
Sumerian remnants. 

Shang artifacts are really exquisite work. They had stirrup pottery 
similar to meso-america. 

Back to Heracles on the FM bowl : if correct this would date the 
bowl to an earlier era than Cabeza - possibly the time of the 
Titans, who had a worldwide seafaring trade in metals going on from 
8,000 bc down to 2,000 bc. Interestingly, one of the Titans was 
named 'Andes' !!! The Sumerians worshipped Heracles by the name 
Melkarth. As stated before, the Frisian city of Tyre later had a 
Temple to Melkarth. Its unclear whether its builders were Frisian, 
Magyar, or Phoenician. 

dates: 
The 3100 bc date given earlier becomes tenuous further into the 
research. The fall of the Harappan culture may be closer to 1800 bc 
from floods, the Sumerian fall closer to 1950 bc from 'storm', and 
the Shang dynasty lasted from 2000 to 1100 bc. The cabeza was found 
near Tiwanaku, Bolivia. The Babylonian/Akkadian word for tin 
is 'anaku'. China was also a source for tin. 

The Inca were a white race, as we were told by Columbus, Pizarro, 
and Garcilaso de la Vega. Whites were found not only in Peru, but 
San Savador and the Canary Islands, and along the Amazon river. 

In view of these events I think its reasonable to suspect that the 
Inca are the followers of Inka's fleet of Frisians and Magyars, 
later known as the Enki from Eridu Sumeria of 2100 bc, and that the 
Fuente Magna and Pokotia scripts are from these ancestors of the 
Inca. It's also possible that Sargon's tin fleet found Bolivia, 
which seems likely, since the Enki/Inka had been there for thousands 
of years. Grafitti of the Phoenicians is all over Amazonia, and 
their common ties with Sumeria are well known. 

Later they may have used the rivers to cross Amazonia to reach the 
Andes. During high water season in Amazonia, its three major rivers 
are joined. Even today the northern mouth of the Amazon is a 
deathtrap for vessels, because at hightide a wall of water 15-25 
feet high rushes upstream. 

Cayce did not say that the migration from Peru was due to invasion, 
instead he said the lands dropped below sealevel, and were flooded. 
He did not say that the Andes were uplifted at the same time, but 
said men witnessed and survived the event. I often wondered if they 
were concurrent around 3100bc during the same disaster. 

Examine the image of the great trilithon on the island of Tonga in 
the Carolines. 

Trilithon on Tonga 

Its impossible to look at this great monument without wondering why 
it was created. Looking deeper I think that I now understand. Its at 
the beginning of the Pacific cross current, and its significance is 
to mark the 'Gateway' to Tiwanaku and the west, the terminus of this 
great central ocean current. It was probably constructed closer 
after the 50,000 bce date of the sinking of Lemuria. 

Understanding the great ocean currents is crucial to the study of 
diffusion, and learning of the early sailing between the continents. 
My recent study of sailing to both coasts of South America was a 
great help to getting the proper perspective. It helped me identify 
the great gateway of Tonga at the beginning of the Pacific 
equatorial counter current, and allows me to say that the 'Gateway 
to the Sun' at Tiwanaku is probably its counterpart, at the terminus 
of the current. I wonder if it is oriented toward Tonga? Some of the 
landings were likely made on the capes of Ecuador. 

The now windswept barren peninsula along Peru's coast called 
Paracas, its said, was once lush and tropical. Its the tip of a 
mostly submerged landmass, now arid and lifeless. Deep burials have 
uncovered what once was a mature civilization, as shown by the 
textiles and weavings. They practiced trepanation of the skull. This 
suggests to me that they may be a settlement of Admiral Inka's 
Frisian contingent, who down to Merovingian times were known to use 
trepanation. The vast climate change the area has undergone points 
to a great antiquity. 

Bailey says they were part of the world seekers of tin, he calls the 
Heracles people. These may have been giants. From the Bible and 
Homer we know the giants were extant and active even during the 
Bronze Age. 

The ancient Magyar "Legend of the Stag" dates to prediluvian times. 
I consider this about 25,000 bce, but few will allow this as true. 
The Magyar descended from Nimrod the mighty hunter, who founded 
Ninevah and Babylon. By the spread of the legend one can trace the 
Magyar settlements to China, Japan, Mexico, Egypt, Iran, 
Mesopotamia, the Turanians, Scythians, Greeks, Finland, and Hungary, 
etc. 

"Legend of the Stag" 

"The Tatarlakai Medallion" was found in Transylvania, and has been 
carbon dated to 6,500 years ago. It goes far in lending credibility 
to the history given in the Frisian chronicle, 'The Oera de Linda" 
book. It also should cause scholars to realize that the Magyar 
written script is the origin and basis for most kindred scripts from 
Europe, the Mideast, and North Africa. 

"The Tatarlakai Medallion" 

Chronological Historical References to the dynamic history of the 
horsemen of Western Asia. 

Here I'm sharing some research info on Sargon 1, where a source of 
copper and diorite was given as the land of Magan : 

3300BC - 1300BC 

2340-2315BC Sargon I founded and ruled the city-state of Akkad, 
after he left the city of Kish where he was an important official. 
He was the first ruler to maintain a standing army. His empire 
lasted less than 200 years. 

2320BC Sargon conquered the independent city-states of Sumer and 
instituted a central government. 
(eawc, p.2) 
c2300BC Phoenicians, a seafaring people, began living along the 
Levantine coast. (SFC, 6/24/99, p.A14) 
2300BC Sumerian cuneiform texts mention the land of Magan (possibly 
Oman) as a source of copper and diorite for the states of 
Mesopotamia. 
(AM, May/Jun 97 p.49) 

There were more reasons to colonize than just a tin shortage, there 
was widespread flooding reported, as documented in Egypt around 2000 
bc, with Libya struck from space and destroyed, plus flooded. 

I confirmed from my Chinese friends that the Shang were foreign 
invaders, and not clan domestic to China. Assuming that the Chinese 
were invaded from either of the nations that are known to have great 
disruption at home. We have the Hyksos fleeing Egypt, and we have 
the Sumerians, which were a maritime tribe on the southern coast of 
Mesopotamia, within them a tribe called the Enki, naming themselves 
after their god of the sea, suffering a big need for tin and having 
suffered a great storm or natural disaster. With Bolivia, Ecuador, 
and Peru - the evidence of the inscriptions and very likely cabeza, 
point to its colonizer being the Inka of Frisia/Sumeria. More into 
oracles than any nation I've ever read about. They would break bones 
and read the future from the way it broke. Other bones with their 
history and travels would also be used as oracles, but serve us as 
primary historical accounts. This major focus on oracles is found 
repeated in the relics of Bolivia. 

Capt Bligh tried to sail around the horn of South America from east 
to west for over 30 days, and was defeated by the contrary currents 
and winds, and sailed around the world instead. The Pacific central 
counter current, that I talked of concerning Tonga, would most 
likely been the route taken from Sumeria, while the straits of 
Magellan may have been the original route of Admiral Inka. This was 
especially true in early times when sails were square, and the 
vessels were not designed to tack into the wind. Knowledge of the 
currents was the most valuable maritime information and method of 
distant voyaging. Thats why Homer and other mythology had so much 
information about ocean streams. It was high wisdom. They sailed 
from the Persian Gulf eastward across the Pacific. The capes of 
Ecuador should be explored, for it was the natural place for 
landfalls and shipwrecks from the short route mentioned. 

I mentioned that 1550 bc is often given as the beginning of Shang 
culture, but from the description these invaders may have arrived 
and brought the high bronze age to China centuries before, with its 
metalurgy, arts, and chariots. So we can't rule out that the 
Sumerian Enki may have arrived much earlier than 1900 bc. The later 
date is possibly indicative of the flowering of Shang culture. 

The emergence of civilization in China: Lungshan Horizon to Shang 
Dynasty 

[quoting the archaeologists] 
"so it seems fair to think that the situation in Lung-shan and Hsia 
times was similar to what is documented historically for Shang" 

Ancient literature of the Enki or Abzu people : ENKI AND THE WORLD 
ORDER 

"The lofty marshland, my favorite spot, " 
"The l[ands] of Magan and Dilmun Looked up at me, En[ki], 
Moored (?) The Dilmun-boat to the ground (?), Loaded the Magan-boat 
sky high; 
The magilum-boat of Meluhha 
Transports gold and silver, 
Brings them to Nippur for Enlil, the [king] of all the lands." 

"He procee[ded] to the land Meluhha, 
Enki, the king of the Abzu, [decrees] (its) fate: 
"Black land, may your trees be large trees, [may they be `highland']-
trees, 
[May] their thrones [fill] the royal palace, 
May your reeds be large reeds, [may they be `highland']-reeds, "

". . . . Elam and Marhashi . . . . 
Were (destined) to be devoured like . . -fish; 
The king (presumably Enki) upon whom Enlil had bestowed might, 
Destroyed their houses, destroyed their walls. 
Their (precious) metal (and) lapis lazuli (and the contents of) 
their storehouses, 
He brought to Nippur for Enlil - the king of all the lands. "

The line from the Sumerian Abzu people of Enki, 'the lofty 
marshlands, my favorite spot', seems a contradiction in terms, 
unless Titicaca was meant. It wasnt Sumeria, where the marshlands 
were low by the river. Like Cabeza, and author Tristan Jones, they 
appreciated the brightness of the heavens as viewed from that place. 

Suddenly about 1720 bc there was an abandonment of large areas of 
Sumeria. There is some evidence that the Euphrates river changed 
course, making all their canals and irrigation works useless. Some 
historians think civil war played a part. The higher class may have 
breached the dykes to flood the lower classes into extinction. 

NIPPUR - SACRED CITY OF ENLIL 

"This dramatic instance of sudden abandonment brought into clear 
focus evidence of similar breaks in stratigraphy in other Old 
Babylonian contexts on the site. We realized that there had been a 
crisis in the history of the city that had resulted in a total, or 
almost total, abandonment. The cessation of dated texts at around 
1720 B.C., noticed by earlier excavators but not discussed [McCown 
and Haines 1967: 74-76], had to be correlated with the 
archaeological evidence. I knew that there was a similar halt in 
dated texts at other sites in Babylonia (e. g., Ur, Larsa, Isin) 
during the reign of Samsuiluna, and I knew that only those cities 
lying along or close to the river's western branches, such as 
Babylon, Kish, Sippar, Borsippa, and Dilbat, continued to produce 
dated texts. I began to suggest in lectures, as early as 1973-74, 
that there may have been a general catastrophe in Babylonia at that 
time, due to a major environmental crisis, probably the shifting of 
water away from the main branch of the Euphrates that had passed 
through Nippur. Elizabeth Stone, in an important restudy of Tablet 
Hill [Stone 1977; 1987], summarized the available evidence for the 
crisis and abandonrnent at Nippur. Hermann Gasche [1989: 109-43] 
subsequently laid out the evidence, in very graphic form, for a 
general collapse of central and southern Babylonia during the 
period." 

How much change in the size of Lake Titicaca has occurred since 1720 
bc? Knowing the terrace of this ancient shoreline may lead to more 
discoveries, plus give us a better idea of how much sediment 
overlies the ruins. I expect deeper excavations will be necessary 
around Tiwanaku, at least 10-20 feet of mud exists. Luckily carbon 
dating of shells should be a big help. The evidence suggests that 
the entire basin of the plateau was covered with seawater when it 
was uplifted. 

As I recall the Spanish burned a great many books of the Inka in the 
16th century. Then later poor scholars contend they had no written 
language. Scores of books and mummies were burned in Cuzco. Even if 
the historians accept the early date for the Inka arrival, it was 
not them that built the great stone temples of Tiwanaku, or the 
fortress above Cuzco. As their legends admit, these ruins were hoary 
with age when they arrived. Who constructed them, and when, is the 
greatest mystery of all. Its fairly certain they came from the 
Pacific after their lands were submerged. I'm satisfied in thinking 
they were Lemurians, until compelling evidence says otherwise. The 
mystics contend these are over 50,000 years old. As time goes by we 
keep pushing back the date for man in the Americas, so this is not 
as difficult to believe as it once was.

The necropolis on the island in Titicaca had articles of bronze, so 
they may be the tombs and bones of the Frisians/Sumerians, and not 
the builders of Tiwanaku. In 1974 a traveler reported seeing two-
story tombs, with standing skeletons looking out small windows 
facing the east. There are new tests to extract dna from teeth, that 
may yield interesting results from those skulls. 

Its possible that many of the descendents of the builders of 
Tiwanaku left Bolivia around 3100 bc, and relocated to the Yucatan, 
and possibly Teotihuacan. The Itza people of the Yucatan at the time 
of the conquest may have known the full history, but most of 
their 'books' were destroyed. Its possible that the 3100 bc exodus 
was from the lowlands in Peru, and the Bolivia host of Tiwanaku had 
preceded them long before, whenever the uplift occurred. The 
architectural and glyph similarities in early Yucatan and Tiwanaku 
are considerable. 

So from 3100 bc until 1720 bc there may have been only a few 
residents around Tiwanaku to oppose the Sumerians if and when they 
arrived, their knowledge of the area coming from legends from 
earlier crewmen that returned from South America, and passed on the 
information to their descendants. 

Concerning the Sumerian and other entries into the Amazon and the 
Andes, it seems most likely that they used the eastern route through 
Amazonia for any sustained contact. Even with knowledge of the 
currents, landing on the pacific coast would have been dicey, with 
as many vessels wrecked as reaching port. Where through Amazonia to 
Ecuador to Potosi and Tiwanaku was easy, with the knowledge to come 
during the right season, probably the low-water dry season. The 
sites of the inscription grafitti should give us a good idea of the 
various routes used by these early visitors. Its unlikely any went 
the southern route thru the matto grosso green hell. Jones and his 
friend are the only known to have made it, and they almost died 
doing it. Most went the northern way to Iquitos, then turned south. 
I've read of several expeditions that traveled downstream from 
there. 

After the great flood we are told by Josephus and other historians 
that most survivors went to Mesopotamia, the land of Shinar. It was 
a nation of nations, all looking different, with a multitude of 
languages. The Sumerians had a great knowledge of agriculture, with 
intricate irrigation canals and water control to increase the yield 
to feed the multitude. Its possible that both the Shang and Inka 
were from the Frisian/Magyar fleet or Sumeria, but maybe different 
tribes. We can see this represented by the different scripts used on 
Fuente Magna. Crews of sailors have always been of assorted 
nationalities. Often jumping ship in exotic ports and taking a berth 
later on another vessel after a sufficient layover ashore. 

review; 'Sailing to Paradise' 

p281 
In 1978 Michael Heltzer published his study of tablets from Ugarit. 
It details the trade in metals during the bronze age. The Akkadians 
of Assyria were the principal sellers of tin, with the cheapest 
prices found in the cities of Nuzi and Arrapha. They controlled the 
market from 2000 bc onwards. Apparently, since no local mines were 
found, they were marketing the imported tin brought in by Frisian 
and later Sumerian sailors, from their far-flung colonies, such as 
Bolivia and China. 

This would explain our finding cuneiform as well as proto-Sumerian 
on Fuente Magna. The Akkadian/Assyrian merchants came with the 
Sumerian sailors and miners, who probably made up the bulk of the 
colonists. Scholars have long known how widespread their influence 
was in the high bronze age by the fact that Mesopotamian weights and 
standards were found throughout the world, particularly along trade 
routes, like west Africa, and at the sites of tin and copper mines. 
The Assyrian word for tin is 'anaku'. It was a simple matter to tow 
the ingots up the rivers to Assur and Nuzi to the anxious European 
and mid-eastern buyers. 

This link gave this info on the period of Sumeria we've been looking 
at : 

The Amorites 

"After the last Sumerian dynasty fell around 2000 BC, Mesopotamia 
drifted into conflict and chaos for almost a century. Around 1900 
BC, a group of Semites called the Amorites had managed to gain 
control of most of the Mesopotamian region. Like the Akkadians, the 
Amorites centralized the government over the individual city-states 
and based their capital in the city of Babylon, which was originally 
called Akkad and served as the center of the Amorite empire. For 
this reason, the Amorites are called the Old Babylonians and the 
period of their ascendancy over the region, which lasted from 1900-
1600 BC, is called the Old Babylonian period." "Perhaps the most 
important legal text in history is an Old Babylonian code of laws 
written by Hammurabi (around 1792-1750 BC), the most famous of the 
Old Babylonian monarchs. This code, called the Code of Hammurabi is 
generally regarded as Sumerian in spirit, but with all the harshness 
of the Old Babylonian penalties. 

Although we know nothing of Old Babylonian religion, they seem to 
have adopted whole-cloth the religion of the Sumerians. We do know 
that the Amorites lived in close contact with the Sumerians for a 
long time preceding their ascendency over the region, so it's 
possible that they gradually adopted Sumerian religion over several 
centuries. The Amorites did, however, import a new god into Sumerian 
religion, Marduk, which they elevated to the supreme position over 
the other gods. Like the Sumerians, the Amorites did not believe 
that life after death held any promise or threat, so like the 
Sumerians, Amorite religion ruthlessly focused on this world. " 

[There were dozens of semi-independent city-states within the 
empire] [FM having also cuneiform suggests earlier than 1700 bc 
imho] 

The scripts on Fuente Magna are I suppose Magyar or Akkadian 
cuneiform and proto- Sumerian. Nothing Egyptian has been found 
directly related to either of these items. The deities worshipped in 
this era in Sumeria were Anu, Bel, Shamash, Marduk, Enlil, Enki, and 
others, but nothing like Nia. It seems possible that the order of 
reading the signs may be in question. It does not appear uniform 
enough to be certain, where to start, and the order. That would 
change much if wrong. or so it seems to me. 

I also want to mention that I think that the scripts on the Pokotia 
Monoliths was not placed there by the original carvers of the 
stones, but are later graffiti. The artist who created the monoliths 
would have done a neater and more planned work with the script. 

Another possibility for the small figure reaching up for the two 
serpents on Fuente Magna is, "the legend that tells hows the goddess 
Hera sent two serpents to kill the infant Heracles [Melkarth] in his 
cradle, only for him to strangle them with his bare hands". 

Our best course is to look for the truth, and let the chips fall 
where they will. The evidence is looking more like an early presence 
in Tiwanaku. Supposedly before the city was built these items were 
deposited in the vicinity, or dropped by colonials. These are near 
the top of the strata and may date to 2,000 bc. Just imagine what 
may be found at the lowest levels. Its possible Bolivia will soon 
steal the spotlight away from Egypt, when its antiquities come to 
light. 

I'm going by Inka legends, shared religious thought, and 
linguistics, to identify the Inka with the Frisian/Magyar of that 
period. I know this will be difficult for many to accept. Many 
refuse to believe the conquistadors statements that the Inka were of 
the white race. Its likely that the fleet of Inka were indeed those 
we know as the Inca. The Inca legends have them shipwrecked on the 
coast of Ecuador at a very early date. 

>From Felipe Guaman Poma de Ayala's Nueva coronica y buen gobierno. : 
His sketches depict Inca royalty wearing tunics bearing the same 
symbols that are used on monoliths and other ancient relics, and 
thought to be Sumerian. 

So then thousands of years after the Frisian/Magyar or Sumerians all 
died, the Inca supposedly decided to imitate the writing they saw on 
artifacts upon their waist bands? The evidence for the beginning of 
the Incas in the 13th c ad may need to be reexamined. Quipu readers 
give a different story. It would have required a long Frisian/Magyar 
presence to have affected Andean culture to the degree that it did. 

We dont have any living Inca to take dna to examine for clues, but 
there are probably mixed-blood descendents, like de la Vega's 
family. There are mummies from the mountain tops, and bones of the 
Incas, where the teeth could yield dna. A test may show relations 
with the Frisian or Sumerians. The Mesopotamians had a great variety 
of nations and peoples within it. It was a refuge, just as Egypt 
was. They may have had trouble understanding each other. It would 
take a large dna sampling just to cover all of the peoples in the 
fertile crescent of 2000 bc. Possibly why Fuente Magna contains 3 or 
more scripts. 

It just occurred to me, that we may be dealing with four or 
five 'scripts' with Fuente Magna. Perhaps the figure and serpents 
represent another tribe present at the founding of the oracle, a 
fourth? The symbols on the outside may shed more light on this 
mystery, or represent a fifth type of script in symbols. 

review : 'Sailing to Paradise' 
p307 
Bailey says "We have fully documented records of the Flood refugees 
from Eridu, the Poseidon/Enki worshippers escaping from Eridu just 
in time; we have the fully documented tradition of the refugees 
having arrived in America to escape the Flood." 

By 1720 bc there was near a complete abandonment of Sumeria. They 
did not return. These are facts. We now know for certain that a 
colony arrived in Bolivia in a time when cuneiform was still in use. 
Without question this must have been near 2000 bc, or before, for 
their use was abandoned soon after that date.

The artifacts and the degree of cultural diffusion says strongly 
that these foreigners stayed in Bolivia for centuries afterwards. 
There is no evidence that they ever left.

Don't be blinded by preconceived theories. Have an open mind or you 
present an obstacle to the truth being found. The most likely theory 
is often the truth, no? 

The expedition by Gene Savoy found the former lost city of Kuelap, 
120 sq miles! [11 miles by 11 miles - how could it be lost?] This 
large a metropolis, yet an obscure city as compared to Tiwanaku. 

We must be free to look for racial anomalies to spot a foreign 
culture in an area, in an investigation such as we're doing. The 
remnant of this city [Kuelap] was thought to be blond and blue eyed 
in nearby mountains. An important clue, nothing more. 

Its incredible that so little merit has been given to the quipu 
historians.

If the quipu history is accurate, which I expect it is. Then the 
Inca shipwrecked off an island on a cape of Ecuador. They may have 
left traces along the coast there, or had their first settlement in 
Ecuador. I've even wondered if there are traces or symbols in the 
Pacific valley cities, with the wonderful irrigation systems, to 
suggest a connection with the fleet of Inka or Sumeria. [like Caral] 

Strangely, China has the American species of peanut before its 
earliest reported use in the new world, even though it is native to 
South America. Its possible that the peanut transfer happened in the 
exchange period in which cabeza was deposited in Bolivia. Maybe 
depictions of the plant, peanut, shells, or pollen may yet be found. 
Very likely the Chinese lacquer technology was brought to the 
Americas around this same early period of diffusion. 

I invite people to read the conquistador chronicles that describe 
the number of royal Inca mummies that were burned in Cuzco to see if 
it sounds like two centuries of Inca rule in the Andes. Some reports 
claim that they didnt get all of them, that most are still hidden in 
secret chambers below the temple of the Sun. Until found that 
remains just speculation. 

Abraham came from Ur. We have mainly discussed the second exodus 
from Sumeria, circa 1720bc. More obscure is the first exodus from 
Sumeria around 3100 bc. Its likely they founded the Indus Harappan 
culture, and what is known as the first dynasty of Egypt at that 
earlier epoch. 

Its interesting to note that all of these major ocean currents 
center on the 30 degree tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. This shows 
their primary importance to early sea voyagers. The currents did the 
transporting, the sails were useless except breaking away to the 
land to make a port. The Somali current goes north during the 
summer, and south during the winter - how convenient. The Great 
Pyramid stands on the north 30 degree latitude, where the ocean 
currents are centered. This was invaluable knowledge to early 
navigators, who did not need a compass if they knew where the 
currents would take them. They would just make an epic detailing the 
clues to the places met along the circuit of the ocean currents, ala 
Homer. 

Wilkins mentions a Fray de la Vega who burned manuscripts in Mexico, 
that told of an arrival by raft that brought contact with another 
civilization. 

With Wilkins you have to be able to divine and divide the wheat from 
the chaff. He cites legends that the natives have a remembrance of 
the mountains rising. He mentions perpetual lights found in stone 
towers in high Brazil, supposedly a primeval highland in the matto 
grosso. Its interesting that the Frisians also built stone towers, 
with the top floor occupied by their vestal virgins and a lamp that 
was kept burning. 

Review: Wilkins 
I've read about 'giant's field', a place in Columbia at the same 
elevation as Tiwanaku, and likely having arisen from sealevel at the 
same time. Its significance lies in the fact that it has evidence 
that a herd of mastodons rode that land to its elevated height, and 
died soon afterwards from the cold and rarefied air, and starvation. 

Their bones may yield carbon dates that will help scientists date 
this geological event, and that at Tiwanaku. Most careful readers 
already admit that men and mastodons were contemporaries. The proofs 
are many and varied. Some sites show mastodons and hunters as 
recently as 6,000 bce. 

>From a satellite image of the altiplano of Bolivia I noted the deep 
ravines that run down to the Pacific. It appears to have left quite 
a salty deposit on its upper reaches, plus the former basin can be 
seen. In fact, to me, it looks as if the sea water was filled to 
overflowing when it was uplifted in ancient times. The ravines 
seemed to be what drained the water down to its present low level. 

You can see why I'm fascinated with Bolivia, its like a great 
gathering of andediluvian high cultures, the Lemurian, Atlantean, 
Frisian, then possibly Sumerian. 

I think when we learn more about the Frisians it will remove the 
veil from our muddled ancient history. They had two kinds of script, 
the standing, and the running. I believe that what we know as Runic 
may be related to the running Frisian script. The Frisians boast of 
50,000 years of culture - and it may be true. So little information 
is available, but we may be on the threshold of something wonderful. 

Our word text comes from the Frisian word tex. Their island of 
Texland, at the mouth of the River Fly, was supposed to have many 
walls covered with their laws and history, it was their literary 
center. Their navigators traveled the globe. Ny-Hellenia who founded 
Athens is Minerva, and a much earlier Helen than the cause of the 
Trojan War. The Frisians may have been among the Hyksos. 

Its possible that Texas may have been reached by the Frisians. 
Buried inscribed walls could yield some amazing history. 

They seemed to be called Frisians either for 'friends', or their 
love of freedom. Their navigators and fleets may have surpassed the 
Phoenicians. It certainly looks like the Frisians were in Cadiz, 
Tyre and Carthage before the Phoenicians. 

The correspondences between Andean culture and Frisian is great, eg, 
Pachamama and their Earth-mother. In fact the Amazons may be related 
to the Frisians. They had vestal virgins as lawgivers and oracles. 
One burg had a hexagonal tower of nine stories, with an eternal lamp 
burning at the top. Some burgs had taller stone skyscrapers. 

Jason and the Argonauts went to Frisian lands after the golden 
fleece. Their practice of collecting gold from the rivers with wool, 
was practiced from the Rhine to east of the Black Sea, into the 
Caucasus Mts. [btw, its interesting to note that JASON has the first 
letters of our months from July to November.] 

Their history describes several great floods, and at least one 
poleshift. The tumuli of northern Norway, so long untouched because 
of the frigid cold, may fill in lots of gaps in the prehistory of 
man. Plus many of their greatest cities are now on the seabed of the 
North Sea. 

Much suggests that the Frisians were mining tin before the Bronze 
Age. They also were known to use weapons of silver. The only 
explanation I can think of is they knew how to alloy tin with 
silver. Possibly another lost art? 

If we accept the validity of the 'Oera Linda Book', then we have the 
Frisian Inka bringing a large colony of Frisians, Finns, and 
Magyars, into South America. The Finns and the Magyar seem to have 
an origin in Asia. In fact this link reveals that the Magyar used 
cuneiform, and must have had much diffusion from Sumeria. In other 
books I've read that Turkish influences have been found in Finland 
and other parts of northern Scandinavia. Coastal inscriptions have 
been found. Btw, an island near Iceland has a Frisian name, showing 
they reached that far. 

I'm interested in the Magyars use of cuneiform, since that script 
has been found in Bolivia. This Frisian connection with South 
America is I think a major find of great importance. I've never 
found a better hypothesis for the origin of the Inca, than the 
Frisian voyage made by Inka. It surely happened before 1270 ad. from 
the few details given in 'Oera The Linda'. I'm guessing the 
Frisian/Inka may have settled peacefully in South America for 
thousands of years before the time credited to the Inca. Its known 
that they were not war-like and empire-building for most of their 
history in the Americas. It was only the last few Inca monarchs that 
invaded their neighbors. Known history seems to start with them. 

Harold Wilkins deserves all the credit. The Frisians were an ancient 
and unique people, that somehow our history books left out. They 
were not the Phoenicians. In fact they were in competition with them 
for trade and lands. Technically, the ancients would disagree with 
my statement. For the Frisians were so ancient that they spoke of 
three distinct races of Frisians, the white race were sons and 
daughters of Frya, the yellow - like the Phoenician, were of another 
earth-mother founder, and the black were of a third. Tens of 
thousands of years ago they were of one language and belief, but the 
Frya race kept the laws and language pure much longer. The Frisians 
were defeated by Rome about 68bc. Their last hurrah were the 
Merovingian kings of France, eg Charlemagne, et al, about 800ad. 

Even the last earth-mothers were imposing seven footers. The Magi 
led the Magyars, as priest-kings. They were skilled in magic, even 
walking on water. 

This link describes how the Hungarians would use hieroglyphs and 
cuneiform together. So fire and a fork means lightning, etc. I leave 
it to the linguists to apply this knowledge to Fuente Magna, if they 
find correspondences. 

PAP GÁBOR ON THE INLAID FIGURES FOUND ON THE STOCK OF A HORSEHERD'S 
LONG WHIP 

I'm reaching the point in my studies where its pointing to an 
entirely different origin for the Bolivian colonists. The more that 
I learn of the possibilities and varieties existing among the fleet 
of Inka - the less certain I am that Sumeria was involved. I want to 
go on the record as saying that the artifacts and scripts found may 
all be from the Frisians, Finns, Hungarians, and Magyars, that 
joined Admiral Inka's expedition to South America. Incan Trepanation 
is similar to Merovingian and Frisian practices. 

We will see where the experts end up with their conclusions, since 
my view lacks proofs, acceptable to some academics. 

TÖRTÉNELMI JEGYZETEK .. Magyar Cuneiform 
WAS HUNGARIAN THE LANGUAGE OF THE ANCIENT EASTERN CULTURES? 
The origins and migrations of the Hungarians 
A cold opinion on the rovás (or Magyar "runes") 
Hungarian Runes 
THE RUNIC TEXT PROCESSOR 
TITUS INDEX LEXICA 
Ancient Hungarian Rovás/Runic Writing 
Site Links Related to Mesopotamia or Language 
Ural-Altaic etymological word list References, Symbols, Language 
Abreviations 

There appears to be a great confusion of people and names. We have 
the real names the people called themselves, and we have the names 
academics of the 19th c attached to these nations. eg, the 
Akkadians, Etruscans, Sumerians, and Scythians are all artificially 
assigned, although the latter was an earlier designation. Many may 
have been misidentified Magyar. 

The admirals may have all been deified in those days. Nef-tunis 
became worshipped as Neptune, as apparently Inka became worshipped 
as Enki. Poseidon and Heracles may have been earlier admirals? 

Crews of each group lived among all of the great seaports of the 
world, like Eridu, Cadiz, Tyre, Carthage. This explains the large 
numbers of tribes in Sumeria. Rowers became exhausted, and were 
exchanged for fresh mariners in ports along the way. 

Before the Inca in Peru was a people Cayce called the Ohum or Ohlm. 
I'm no linguist, but found ohum means grandmother in Lenape, spoken 
by Delaware Indians. Atlanteans settlers arriving in Peru may have 
called those preceding them this because they were from Lemuria, I 
suspect. I hope my efforts guide those better qualified to find 
linguistic connections. It may have the closest comparison to 
Atlantean. 

The Red Record, history book of the grandfathers, written on prayer 
sticks ! 

aka the 'Walam Olum' 

A portion of The Walam Olum 

Lenape - English Dictionary 

Common Words and Phrases in Lenape 

Sacred Texts: Native American 

I found a wise Spanish translation of Edgar Cayce on Atlantis, that 
may be interesting to our Espanol readers. link 

The last Inca : 
This describes life and the economy under the Inca .. Pedro de Cieza 
de Léon: Chronicles of the Incas, 1540 

In 1781 the last Inca was tortured, then drawn and quartered in 
Cuzco. Remote relatives were rounded up, about 90, and sent to 
prisons in Spain, most or all died there. 

Cayce said there are caches of riches, and a golden temple of the 
Sun, lost or hidden in the Andes. He gave few details about 
location, but stressed it must be one who will serve the native 
people wisely with the proceeds. After seeing the artifacts therein, 
it will be impossible to deny Atlantis, he suggests. 

Cayce states the Atlanteans joined Lemurians in the Andes around in 
10,000bc [I read Quechua joined Aymara] and established what would 
become the Inca empire after the arrival of another people, I 
understand was the fleet of Admiral Inka, of Frisian, Finns and 
Hungarians, containing the eastern Magyar. Nef-tunis going to be a 
mercenary for Egypt, was too early to be the invasion of the sea 
people, or the Hyksos, of the two dates of 1550bc? to 1250bc? This 
fleet arrival by Nef-tunis must have been closer 10,507 bc. 

Studies and carbon dating show men living in the Andes by hunting 
mastodons and camels by 21,000 bp 

The Original Peopling of Latin America 

This will disturb some readers, but I have reread the history 
within 'Oera the Linda', and it clearly places the voyage of Inka 
before the Trojan War, that Cayce gave indirectly as 5500bc. Plus I 
did much research within the Cayce readings on the Inca origins, 
which began with Atlanteans about 10,700 bc, joined by the Frisian / 
Magyar fleet not long afterwards. Cayce did not state who the other 
founder was, but in other places he refers to the Inka already by 
the time the Atlanteans entered Egypt - which was right after 10,000 
bc. This early a date for the Inca even surprises me, but from my 
open-minded research seems to be true. It does require faith in the 
validity of Cayce and the 'Oera the Linda Book'. 

Apparently, the fleet of Inka colonized China subsequent to 
Peru/Bolivia, and may have used the central Pacific currents to come 
and go between China and South America. Thus explaining the presence 
of Cabeza near Titicaca. 

By 1500 bc Admiral Inka was already deified by the Frisian / Magyar 
tribes at Sumeria, and the spelling corrupted to Enki. 

For the studious I've included attached exact quotes from my Cayce 
research. 

Cayce Readings Research 

I was surprised to learn that the great Atlantean teacher Alta, who 
established the beginning of what became the Inca, also did the same 
at " Luzon ", and Ohio [another site for ancient aircraft]. He had 
the ability to travel and communicate globally, so maybe the 
Philipines have an undiscovered rich civilization, and he was the 
source of ancient aircraft knowledge? 

Why would the Nazca figures have been made, if they had no aircraft 
to view them? It would have been the perfect solution to get back 
and forth to sealevel, and avoid the arduous mountain trek. Certain 
burgh-femmes were devoted to science. The Frisians were known to 
have developed powerful iron crossbows by 10,500 bc. Rubber and 
strong vines were plentiful in Amazonia to catapult gliders. 





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/54wwlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Templar-de-Rosemont/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Templar-de-Rosemont-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/