|
Re: Definition of a Mamzer: msg#00244culture.religion.jewish.avodah
RYaakov Ellis, citing the case of an Israeli woman going to court in order to establish that her son's father is not the man to whom she was married at the time, but is the man with whom she had an affair, writes <The mother is claiming that she had no actual contact with the man who was her halachic husband at the time of conception. There might be a chazaka that "the majority of sexual acts take place with the legal husband", but in this case, we have the direct testimony of the woman that this is not so. Does the name printed on the birth certificate actually have significance in this case in determining whether or not the child is a mamzer?> The halacha is explicit (EH 4:29): "Eishes ish she'omeres al ha'ubar sheino miba'alah einah ne'emenes l'foslo." Her unsupported statement is halachically meaningless. (It is said that RMF was once m'sader kiddushin, when one of the mothers, under the chupah, said the child wasn't hers. His immediate reaction was, "You're not ne'emenses," and he proceeded with birkas eirusin.) However, she is believed (because of shavya anafsha chaticha d'issura) that she is prohibited from marrying the man with whom she claims to have committed adultery. EMT _______________________________________________ Avodah mailing list Avodah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/avodah-aishdas.org |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Uman/Leaving the women behind: 00244, MPoppers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Pas Lechem [shacharis]: 00244, Aryeh Stein |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Definition of a Mamzeri: 00244, Zev Sero |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Definition of a Mamzer: 00244, Shoshana L. Boublil |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |