Re: Ask the right of mobility for artists

Louise, my English is not much better and thanks for the nice word 
"Anglophone", just to give you a fast reply and to illustrate the 
background of my question, yepp, Schengen is a good topic, immunity of 
Schengen burocrats is another one: What made me upset, maybe bizzare, is 
the Lukaschenko money case. When you first see it you may think: wow, 
this pig. But then I asked myself: what is the difference to the Hamas 
money case in Israel? Or any other possible future case, money or not? 
It is all about some arrogance of power, emotions over ratio. Today it 
is Lukaschenkos money, tomorrow it will be social security, whatever, 
with the same attitude, maybe, maybe not.

I let it open, maybe others have other ideas, thanks for your thoughfull 
inspiring reply,

best,

H.


Louise Desrenards wrote:
> Sorry for my bad Anglophone writing...
>
>
> Dear Heiko Recktenwald,
>
> Of course you are true. I trust in the same arguments and causes.
> But, in matter of struggles, any localized detail of resistance it counts.
>
> And what of autonomy?
>
> It comes me to mind that you are perhaps in a country of Europe which gains
> freedoms or where freedom is stable, while as long as Frenchwoman I am
> currently in a country which loses its freedoms on all the faces; we must
> fight detail by detail face by face, and same time to overall... This
> introduced a practice with the blow for blow may be contestable in other
> European circumstances.  I am not for the European union but for the union
> of the European Communities. It is not the same thing. I am for an
> associative and interdependent federation of diverse respective autonomies,
> surely not for a united central direction against people diversity.
>
> I do not see in what the artist's struggle that would be a prevention for
> the general progress of the fights against the essential targets: quite to
> the contrary I guess. Each specific projection creates an established fact
> helping the other fights to progress, would not be this that the diversity
> of the mobilization can meet at a given time. We know of it.
>
> My received lesson of the immediate and remote past is initially to count on
> its own forces, here is an argument that the Leninist Marxists of the first
> Soviets knew to divide with the libertarians and later the Maoism of the
> Long walk:)
>
> What you propose to us there as programs critical is something that in
> addition we all are harnessed to fight... it is not a scoop.  Your tone is
> not that of the political projection but morals.
>
>  And for my part you know, lessons of morals in policy, I call that is of
> the ideology can be because I am already quite old. From another lesson of
> my own mind as near a former activist of the heats years I feel myself allow
> to say that if I approve your right vision of the points impossible to
> circumvent, in addition on the other hand I personally disapprove the
> strategy that it seems to support as well the orders as the project ‹ if it
> is that one of the order.
>
> I am of the critical diverse (sciences, philosophy and politics) I mean for
> the other -not the same one under the representative united. You talk of
> mass or of silent mass? It is not exactly the same thing...
>
> I'am sorry for this opposition...
>
> L.
>
>
>
> On 22/05/06 6:44, "Heiko Recktenwald" 
> <uzs106-OhoefBWHl6Eb1SvskN2V4Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> probably wrote:
>
>   
> > As much as I like the arts, why should artists be priviledged?
> >
> > I would prefer to think about - and to sign, if it is reasonable -
> > something more open. Are artists anyhow better?
> >
> > I hate superficial emotional politics, whereever they happen, whoever
> > proposes whatever.
> >
> > Lukaschenkos foreign money, that is blocked by the EU, Hamas foreign
> > money, that is blocked by Israel, maybe far fetched, maybe bad examples,
> > not artists anyway, but there should be clear and strict rules for
> > everybody and everywhere, Lukaschenko, the bad guy of the year,
> > Rockefeller, Deutsche Bank etc or not.
> >
> > Euroclear,
> >
> > H.
> >
> > Louise Desrenards wrote:
> >     
> > > In order to protect the artists rights to mobility, and in reaction to the
> > >   
> > >       
> > <...>
> >     
> > > http://schengenopera.free.fr/index.php?lang=fr
> > > http://schengenopera.free.fr/index.php?lang=de
> > > http://schengenopera.free.fr/index.php?lang=es
> > > http://schengenopera.free.fr/index.php?lang=uk
> > >   
> > >       
> > <...>
> >
> >     
> > >  And we are increasingly anxious when hearing the announcements of an even
> > > more selective immigration policy. It is firmly bound to the logic of
> > > exploitation of the poor by the rich, very far from accompanying the
> > > development effort (including cultural) that many countries legitimately
> > > expect.
> > >
> > >   
> > >       
>
>
>
>