|
Re: Gates' Buffet, or Fail-Safe Philanthropy: msg#00007culture.internet.nettime
On the contrary, it impresses a great many people. Presumably, that's the point of collecting so much money in the first place, if like Buffett you don't intend to leave it to your offspring. It would of course have been possible to run these businesses as non-profits, never collecting the billions to begin with. Best, Michael On Jul 3, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Nicholas Ruiz wrote: > To transfer the money to his surrogate son impresses no one. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Gates' Buffet, or Fail-Safe Philanthropy: 00007, Nicholas Ruiz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | The New Mediated (Em)Body Is My Others: 00007, Andrew Bucksbarg |
| Previous by Thread: | Gates' Buffet, or Fail-Safe Philanthropyi: 00007, Nicholas Ruiz |
| Next by Thread: | The New Mediated (Em)Body Is My Others: 00007, Andrew Bucksbarg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |