I'm a few days late with this. I don't feel I have truly got into my
project yet -- I find I always take a little longer than I anticipate
to get into the flow of these things. Nevertheless, this is a short
piece about a man from the fishing village nearby. I've always found
him interesting because he used to be one of the few people there who
don't fish for a living. (There are more now).
I hope to have more about him as I move ahead with this. This much, for now.
cheers,
dilip.
---
Twice a Day Paper Route
-----------------------
Dilip D'Souza
The thing that strikes me is the mention of 60 kg. 60 kg, carried to
Dadar. 60 kg, carried to Dadar on a bicycle. 60 kg, carried to Dadar
on a bicycle twice a day, for some 20 years.
I noticed Ramdas's strong and sinewy wrists when he first started
coming to our home, especially when he would easily lift big bundles
of papers hung from his spring balance to show me how much they
weighed. We called him "paperwala" -- so much that I am ashamed to
admit that's what I thought his name was -- because he would take away
our old newspapers once a month. But it wasn't until he retired
recently, and I sat him down for a chat about his life, that I really
comprehended the physical magnitude of his work. That I really
understood what gave him those sinewy wrists.
The mathematics is simple. He had about 250 clients like me, he says.
I would give him about 15 kg of paper every month. If I was typical,
that meant he handled about 3800 kg of paper every month. Divide by
30, that's about 125 kg every day. Indeed: two trips to Dadar a day,
60 kg each time. And you cart that kind of load around -- not just to
Dadar twice a day, but from the 250 homes to yours -- and you do it
over two decades, you develop some serious muscles.
>
From Chimbai, the small Bandra fishing village where Ramdas lives, to
Dadar is easily 5-6 km. That Ramdas biked that distance and back,
twice a day with large loads, impressed me greatly. But listening to
him, I was more struck by the other, the smaller, details of his life.
Chimbai is known as an old fishing village. By now, it is just another
part of Bandra, if a more crowded and downscale part of this upscale
suburb. But even so, you'll find women every day, sitting on either
side of the lane through Chimbai, calling out from behind little
makeshift tables piled high with fresh, dripping, aromatic fish.
The tables make the lane even narrower than it already is. Walking
down the lane is difficult, let alone driving along it. When I do
either, I invariably remember the time a few years ago when a kid was
run over on one of Bandra's main roads during rush hour. This led to
an impromptu and angry "rasta-roko" there. The traffic police had the
presence of mind to quickly divert traffic through Bandra's leafy
lanes. One was the lane through Chimbai. I remember watching bus after
BEST bus emerge from the lane, drivers sweaty and exasperated with the
effort of maneuvring their giant red beasts past the fish vendors.
The women, of course, were unfazed. Some even tried selling fish to
the passengers in the slow-moving buses.
That kind of place, Chimbai. Fishermen, houses nearly on top of each other.
And somewhere in there, a dealer in waste paper.
Ramdas's family left Porbandar, Gujarat, in 1941. His father settled
in Chimbai, where Ramdas himself was born in September 1947.
Midnight's child? Ramdas seems hardly to think of it that way. To hear
him speak, Independence was just a little blip of history. But Chimbai
was Bombay, the big city, teeming even then with opportunity that
Porbandar could not match. Of course, there was very little in Chimbai
at the time, certainly not the narrow lane. But Ramdas's family
settled in a one-room tenement on the ground floor of a two-storey
chawl, owned by a Kolhapur-based landlord. They have been there since,
now paying a rent of Rs 63 a month.
Expectedly, Ramdas is nostalgic about the early days. "There was
nothing here," he says again. The only people in Chimbai were the Koli
fishermen, and for those who catalogue these things, they were of two
kinds. The Christian Kolis lived at the southern end of the village,
the Hindus at the northern end. Ramdas's home was bang in between the
two communities. It remains that way today: turn left (south) out of
his home and about the first establishment you come across is a
Catholic undertaker. Turn right and there's a small Hindu shrine. The
languages you hear are different, the general "feel" of the two areas
are different; all this, along one short street.
Ramdas speaks glowingly about both kinds of neighbours. "Very good
people," he says, "very good people." And as if to drive home that
point, he says nobody has ever come to ask for money when the Ganesh
festival rolls around. "In other parts of Bombay," he says, "Shiv Sena
people come and extort money for Ganesh. Not here."
Ramdas's first job was in Mahim in the early '60s, from where he moved
on to Marine Lines. He sold purses. He earned Rs 25 a month and his
railway pass cost him all of Rs 3.75. As always, numbers like those
leave me astonished. Passes are about 20 times as expensive as that
today: has the price index gone up to that extent?
But starting in 1969, Ramdas was a rice smuggler like a lot of others
were at the time. He would travel beyond the city limits, to Vasai,
and bring back bags of rice. This was a worthwhile way of earning
because rice sold legitimately in Bombay attracted taxes. So a man who
was willing to bring it in on the quiet from outside could both
undercut the city retailers and make a small profit. Ramdas was such a
man. He would make five or six trips a day, bringing in 10 kg of rice
each time. After deducting his weekly bribe of Rs 20 or 25, he made
two rupees on each kg. Not a bad salary increment. It must have also
been good preparation physically for the work he would turn to next,
when the rice route became unprofitable.
Waste paper, that is.
And it is via his paper business, 120 kg a day, that Ramdas put his
two sons through English-medium schools and colleges. Do they work
with you now, I ask. He gives me a withering look that I've never seen
on him before. He doesn't have to say what I know he means: would he
have worked this hard just to put them to the waste paper grindstone
too? What he does say is, with a hint of acerbity: "No, both are
educated!"
That they are. One works in a cargo shipping firm, the other in an
online stock-trading firm.
And now that they are both educated, Ramdas has retired. Did you get
tired of the work, I ask. "No, no, it's not that. There was no place
in the house for us! We only have one 10 by 10 room. Papers piled to
the ceiling, no brightness in the room, I was working every day till 2
am. Eating at 130 in the morning!" So he stopped, late last year.
"I'm happy," he says, "but I've become lazy."
He laughs. But I get the sense the laugh hasn't reached his eyes.
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Attempt by the Hindu right wing to disrupt the screenings of VIBGYOR film fest
Dear Friends,
There was an attempt by the Hindu right wing to disrupt the screenings
yesterday at the VIBGYOR Film Festival (Feb 22 to 25) in Trichur,
Kerala (http://www.vibgyorfilmfest.com ).They have filed a police
complaint against the festival too.
Vibgyor Film Festival organised an Open Forum entitled 'Censorious
State/Civil Society' yesterday, where the issue was discussed atlength
and the declaration attached was endorsed and signed by over a hundred
people. Some supporters of the Hindu right also attended and there was
an animated discussion on Amudhan's film and on what constitutes
'nation' and 'national interest'. The point was made that in a
democratic society we need to discuss our differences, as was being
done at the open forum, rather than trying to ban and stop work that
one disagrees with. Earlier, there was a threat from them that they
would move the court to stop the festival.
We also decided to make 100 copies of Amudhan's Vande Mataram and Shit
and distribute them all over Kerala (and elsewhere) and to organise
screenings. There has been tremendous solidarity from filmmakers and
concerned citizens on this issue.
It will be good if you are arranging the screenings of this films in
various parts of India.
~ Regards
Anivar Aravind
IN DEFENCE OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND DIVERSITY
Documentary filmmakers, cultural activists and concerned citizens
protest against
disruption at Vibgyor Film Festival.
On February 23, 2006, supporters of Hinduvta groups shouted slogans
and tried to disrupt the screening of R. P. Amudhan's Vande Mataram: A
Shit Version, a film which questions the heinous practice of
untouchability and manual scavenging. They left quickly after the
audience protested against this undemocratic behavior. They accused
the organizers of screening 'anti-national' films and filed a police
complaint.
Documentary filmmakers, cultural activists and concerned citizens
condemn this undemocratic attempt by a handful of intolerant vested
interests to stifle freedom of expression, using the bogey of national
interest. Vibgyor has emerged as a dynamic space that has been
showcasing a wide range of socially relevant films to large and
enthusiastic audiences of film lovers. Such creative spaces for
dialogue and debate must be protected and supported in the interest of
a responsive and democratic civil society that speaks out against the
injustice and tolerance.
We, the undersigned, condemn this attack and reiterate our right to
freedom of expression and our commitment to diversity and pluralism.
----------------
Are dalits part of (Vande) Mataram- India?
Date:24.02.06
Thrissur
"The Vande mataram- A shit version" music video using the "Patriotic"
remix album on visuals of manual scavenging (Dalits removing other
people's shit manually) is a conscious attempt to question the pseudo
patriotism of the song and a society which allows such heinous
practices on casteist lines.
Some Hindutva people protested against this video after its screening
at the VIBGYOR festival on 23.2.06, 3 pm at Thrissur Sahitya academy,
Thrissur. As they continue their 'struggle' for preserving national
pride by filing a complaint with thrissur local police and planning to
approach the local court against the festival, some stinking truths
are surfacingâ
First and foremost is that â According to them scavenging and the
dalit workers who are doing it are base and a sanctified song like
vandemataram being used to depict them is unacceptable.
Two, that no one has any right to express opinions different from
those of Hindutva forces in any public space or for that matter any
space. If somebody dares to do so their patriotism integrity and
values would be questioned. They will enter closed screenings
uninvited and obstruct the programme and will file false complaints
against them in police stations. And a "pro-active" police force which
takes years to respond to problems of ordinary masses would jump into
action immediately.
If the hindutva forces that obstructed the Film festival and want to
stop it are really interested in expressing their patriotism,
 First they should denounce in public the anti dalit anti woman
and anti human Manu smriti which propagates varnashrama dharma, the
fountain head of segregating human beings into a caste hierarchy.
 Stop hate campaign against the minorities and Raise their
voice against communal violence which cripples minorities and poor
people
 They should protest wherever human beings, always dalits, are
removing human shit manually
 They should fight in the fray when atrocities are unleashed on
the dalits and adivasis.
Finally, the VIBGYOR festival which gives space to discuss and analyse
various such concerns has to be appreciated. All democratic sections
should extend their support to the festival and also o the larger
struggle of various film makers and activists who are trying to raise
voices against injustices in their own way in a growing atmosphere of
cultural intolerance of fundamental elements.
R.P.Amudhan,
Film maker, Tamil nadu.
amudhanrp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--------------------
Anivar Aravind
GAIA
Mob: +91 9895803545
--
The great moral question of the twenty-first century is: If all
knowledge, all culture, all art, all useful information, can be
costlessly given to everyone at the same price that it is given to
anyone
-- if everyone can have everything, everywhere, all the time, why is
it ever moral to exclude anyone from anything?
- Eben Moglen
Next Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Da Vinci Trial pits history against art
Authors of "history" book called "holy Blood and the Holy Grail" sues dan Brown
for plagiarism. From the Observer:
Da Vinci trial pits history against art
David Smith
Sunday February 26, 2006
The Observer
Nothing less than the future of Western literature is at stake in the High
Court tomorrow. Or so the publisher of The Da Vinci Code, the money-spinning
blockbuster by Dan Brown, is expected to argue in a ground-breaking trial.
Brown, whose tale of clerical conspiracy and murder has become the bestselling
hardback adult novel of all time, is accused of plundering his plot from a
non-fiction work called The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail
Historians Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, who co-wrote the book with Henry
Lincoln, claim that Brown plagiarised 'the whole jigsaw puzzle' of their
decade's worth of research - that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and had a child,
founding a bloodline that was protected by the Knights Templar.
If they win, the historians will seek an injunction preventing further
infringement of their copyright. In theory, this could bar Random House from
publishing Brown's book, which has sold more than 40 million copies, and even
threaten the British release of the Â53m film adaptation, starring Tom Hanks,
Audrey Tautou and Sir Ian McKellen.
However, lawyers representing Random House are expected to argue that the
implications would damage the art of writing itself.
It is believed they will tell the court that for centuries writers have
recycled plots, themes and ideas from each other. One literary figure has
pointed out that apart from A Midsummer Night's Dream, every one of
Shakespeare's plays is based on another source. Such trading has given rise to
the saying, 'good writers borrow, great writers steal'.
Brown, now a multi-millionaire who shuns the media spotlight, is expected to be
in London to defend his work. A Random House source said: 'Can you copyright an
idea? Previously copyright has applied just to how the idea is used. This is
why we are confident. If the claimants win, it's the end of John Grisham, Tom
Clancy, Robert Harris, Helen Fielding - and Shakespeare.'
Random House is expected to point to a series of other books that have also
'borrowed' from Baigent and Leigh's work in the 24 years since it was
published, none of which was sued. The implication is that Brown, like JK
Rowling and others, has been targeted because of his multi-millionaire status.
'Where there's a hit, there's a writ,' the source said.
But Baigent and Leigh, who have hired leading QC Jonathan Rayner James, will
argue that Brown has gone further than anyone else in appropriating their
research. When the writ was issued, Leigh said: 'It's not that Dan Brown has
lifted certain ideas, because a number of people have done that before.
'It's rather that he's lifted the whole architecture - the whole jigsaw puzzle
- and hung it on to the peg of a fictional thriller.'
Lincoln, the third author of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, has declined to
explain why he is not joining the legal action, although he is believed to be
in ill health. Last year he said The Da Vinci Code had 'nothing to do with the
facts. It's a potboiler, but a good one.'
In a further twist, Baigent and Leigh's book is also owned by Random House and
has sold more than two million copies, enjoying a surge since a revised
illustrated edition was republished last September. Some observers suspect a
publicity stunt, but Joel Rickett, deputy editor of the Bookseller, said this
was unlikely: 'From the outside it looks like a long shot, but to get to this
stage I'd guess they must have spent hundreds of thousands of pounds and got
top legal brains to study it. They must really believe they've got a case.
'In a sense they're admitting their work has elements of fiction to it. If it
was pure history, how could they copyright history? When historians discover
something they can't copyright it.'
Rickett added that if the pair won an unlikely victory it would set an
astonishing precedent. 'It would have seismic implications. Novelists would
have to be very, very careful when using non-fiction sources to build their
fiction. Many novelists read a single work of history and use it as the basis
of their book.'
Professor Lisa Jardine, a former Man Booker Prize judge, said: 'They are not
going to win. I don't think plagiarism any longer holds up - we live in a world
of cut and paste, and in a global village.
'Creativity is always a beautifully arranged patchwork that nudges something a
little further on.'
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Attempt by the Hindu right wing to disrupt the screenings of VIBGYOR film fest
Dear Friends,
There was an attempt by the Hindu right wing to disrupt the screenings
yesterday at the VIBGYOR Film Festival (Feb 22 to 25) in Trichur,
Kerala (http://www.vibgyorfilmfest.com ).They have filed a police
complaint against the festival too.
Vibgyor Film Festival organised an Open Forum entitled 'Censorious
State/Civil Society' yesterday, where the issue was discussed atlength
and the declaration attached was endorsed and signed by over a hundred
people. Some supporters of the Hindu right also attended and there was
an animated discussion on Amudhan's film and on what constitutes
'nation' and 'national interest'. The point was made that in a
democratic society we need to discuss our differences, as was being
done at the open forum, rather than trying to ban and stop work that
one disagrees with. Earlier, there was a threat from them that they
would move the court to stop the festival.
We also decided to make 100 copies of Amudhan's Vande Mataram and Shit
and distribute them all over Kerala (and elsewhere) and to organise
screenings. There has been tremendous solidarity from filmmakers and
concerned citizens on this issue.
It will be good if you are arranging the screenings of this films in
various parts of India.
~ Regards
Anivar Aravind
IN DEFENCE OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND DIVERSITY
Documentary filmmakers, cultural activists and concerned citizens
protest against
disruption at Vibgyor Film Festival.
On February 23, 2006, supporters of Hinduvta groups shouted slogans
and tried to disrupt the screening of R. P. Amudhan's Vande Mataram: A
Shit Version, a film which questions the heinous practice of
untouchability and manual scavenging. They left quickly after the
audience protested against this undemocratic behavior. They accused
the organizers of screening 'anti-national' films and filed a police
complaint.
Documentary filmmakers, cultural activists and concerned citizens
condemn this undemocratic attempt by a handful of intolerant vested
interests to stifle freedom of expression, using the bogey of national
interest. Vibgyor has emerged as a dynamic space that has been
showcasing a wide range of socially relevant films to large and
enthusiastic audiences of film lovers. Such creative spaces for
dialogue and debate must be protected and supported in the interest of
a responsive and democratic civil society that speaks out against the
injustice and tolerance.
We, the undersigned, condemn this attack and reiterate our right to
freedom of expression and our commitment to diversity and pluralism.
----------------
Are dalits part of (Vande) Mataram- India?
Date:24.02.06
Thrissur
"The Vande mataram- A shit version" music video using the "Patriotic"
remix album on visuals of manual scavenging (Dalits removing other
people's shit manually) is a conscious attempt to question the pseudo
patriotism of the song and a society which allows such heinous
practices on casteist lines.
Some Hindutva people protested against this video after its screening
at the VIBGYOR festival on 23.2.06, 3 pm at Thrissur Sahitya academy,
Thrissur. As they continue their 'struggle' for preserving national
pride by filing a complaint with thrissur local police and planning to
approach the local court against the festival, some stinking truths
are surfacingâ
First and foremost is that â According to them scavenging and the
dalit workers who are doing it are base and a sanctified song like
vandemataram being used to depict them is unacceptable.
Two, that no one has any right to express opinions different from
those of Hindutva forces in any public space or for that matter any
space. If somebody dares to do so their patriotism integrity and
values would be questioned. They will enter closed screenings
uninvited and obstruct the programme and will file false complaints
against them in police stations. And a "pro-active" police force which
takes years to respond to problems of ordinary masses would jump into
action immediately.
If the hindutva forces that obstructed the Film festival and want to
stop it are really interested in expressing their patriotism,
 First they should denounce in public the anti dalit anti woman
and anti human Manu smriti which propagates varnashrama dharma, the
fountain head of segregating human beings into a caste hierarchy.
 Stop hate campaign against the minorities and Raise their
voice against communal violence which cripples minorities and poor
people
 They should protest wherever human beings, always dalits, are
removing human shit manually
 They should fight in the fray when atrocities are unleashed on
the dalits and adivasis.
Finally, the VIBGYOR festival which gives space to discuss and analyse
various such concerns has to be appreciated. All democratic sections
should extend their support to the festival and also o the larger
struggle of various film makers and activists who are trying to raise
voices against injustices in their own way in a growing atmosphere of
cultural intolerance of fundamental elements.
R.P.Amudhan,
Film maker, Tamil nadu.
amudhanrp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--------------------
Anivar Aravind
GAIA
Mob: +91 9895803545
--
The great moral question of the twenty-first century is: If all
knowledge, all culture, all art, all useful information, can be
costlessly given to everyone at the same price that it is given to
anyone
-- if everyone can have everything, everywhere, all the time, why is
it ever moral to exclude anyone from anything?
- Eben Moglen
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Da Vinci Trial pits history against art
Authors of "history" book called "holy Blood and the Holy Grail" sues dan Brown
for plagiarism. From the Observer:
Da Vinci trial pits history against art
David Smith
Sunday February 26, 2006
The Observer
Nothing less than the future of Western literature is at stake in the High
Court tomorrow. Or so the publisher of The Da Vinci Code, the money-spinning
blockbuster by Dan Brown, is expected to argue in a ground-breaking trial.
Brown, whose tale of clerical conspiracy and murder has become the bestselling
hardback adult novel of all time, is accused of plundering his plot from a
non-fiction work called The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail
Historians Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, who co-wrote the book with Henry
Lincoln, claim that Brown plagiarised 'the whole jigsaw puzzle' of their
decade's worth of research - that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and had a child,
founding a bloodline that was protected by the Knights Templar.
If they win, the historians will seek an injunction preventing further
infringement of their copyright. In theory, this could bar Random House from
publishing Brown's book, which has sold more than 40 million copies, and even
threaten the British release of the Â53m film adaptation, starring Tom Hanks,
Audrey Tautou and Sir Ian McKellen.
However, lawyers representing Random House are expected to argue that the
implications would damage the art of writing itself.
It is believed they will tell the court that for centuries writers have
recycled plots, themes and ideas from each other. One literary figure has
pointed out that apart from A Midsummer Night's Dream, every one of
Shakespeare's plays is based on another source. Such trading has given rise to
the saying, 'good writers borrow, great writers steal'.
Brown, now a multi-millionaire who shuns the media spotlight, is expected to be
in London to defend his work. A Random House source said: 'Can you copyright an
idea? Previously copyright has applied just to how the idea is used. This is
why we are confident. If the claimants win, it's the end of John Grisham, Tom
Clancy, Robert Harris, Helen Fielding - and Shakespeare.'
Random House is expected to point to a series of other books that have also
'borrowed' from Baigent and Leigh's work in the 24 years since it was
published, none of which was sued. The implication is that Brown, like JK
Rowling and others, has been targeted because of his multi-millionaire status.
'Where there's a hit, there's a writ,' the source said.
But Baigent and Leigh, who have hired leading QC Jonathan Rayner James, will
argue that Brown has gone further than anyone else in appropriating their
research. When the writ was issued, Leigh said: 'It's not that Dan Brown has
lifted certain ideas, because a number of people have done that before.
'It's rather that he's lifted the whole architecture - the whole jigsaw puzzle
- and hung it on to the peg of a fictional thriller.'
Lincoln, the third author of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, has declined to
explain why he is not joining the legal action, although he is believed to be
in ill health. Last year he said The Da Vinci Code had 'nothing to do with the
facts. It's a potboiler, but a good one.'
In a further twist, Baigent and Leigh's book is also owned by Random House and
has sold more than two million copies, enjoying a surge since a revised
illustrated edition was republished last September. Some observers suspect a
publicity stunt, but Joel Rickett, deputy editor of the Bookseller, said this
was unlikely: 'From the outside it looks like a long shot, but to get to this
stage I'd guess they must have spent hundreds of thousands of pounds and got
top legal brains to study it. They must really believe they've got a case.
'In a sense they're admitting their work has elements of fiction to it. If it
was pure history, how could they copyright history? When historians discover
something they can't copyright it.'
Rickett added that if the pair won an unlikely victory it would set an
astonishing precedent. 'It would have seismic implications. Novelists would
have to be very, very careful when using non-fiction sources to build their
fiction. Many novelists read a single work of history and use it as the basis
of their book.'
Professor Lisa Jardine, a former Man Booker Prize judge, said: 'They are not
going to win. I don't think plagiarism any longer holds up - we live in a world
of cut and paste, and in a global village.
'Creativity is always a beautifully arranged patchwork that nudges something a
little further on.'