|
Re: [Urbanstudy] Re: Problematizing Definitions: msg#00078culture.india.sarai.reader
hm. i hope i am not making an ass of myself in the presence of a whole bunch of cultural studies folks. i think it is better to think of a geneology of culture rather than define it. to my reckoning, the first loaded use of the word culture was made by mathew arnold. some time in the second half of the 19th century. this was just before the time colonial anthropologists were seriously beginning to wonder if they had it all worked out. for arnold, culture was high culture all that is 'beautiful and intelligent' and he was strongly opposed to the plebian and the ordinary. and you must read his dismissive references to the irish! education therefore had to be in the hands of the cultured and not democratized. later on a whole range of marxist critics led by raymond williams turned it on its head and argued that culture is really the ordinary. this was a way of challenging the ways in which high culture reproduces power relations. raymond williams and his work notwithstanding, culture remained largely the domain of anthropologists first the structuralists strauss and then bodley and geertz types whose primary means of getting at culture was via ethnography where one places oneself firmly in the lifeworlds of those whose culture is being studied and then withdraws to the library to reflect on the ensembles of meanings and practices that are not one's own. hence ideas like primitives, savages and noble savages and then the ultimate 'thick descriptionists and so on. Here is the cross that the scholar bears: she/he at the moment of the ethnographic encounter and actually coproduces meaning with an interlocutor but when she or he withdraws to write about it for a diffferent audience, she or he produces the culture of the 'other' for the consumption of scholarly kin. thus in your interaction with the woman whose child you thought was being treated cruelly (at least at firsy anyway) she and you together coproduced meaning.but when you report it to us, the woman remains outside of this conversation and it is her culture versus our culture that we end up talking about. well, that was an attempt at a rough and ready geneology of culture. i have no idea what culturality means. others please add or delete. anant --- zainab@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > I am still interested in understanding the 'general > meaning' of the term > culture? What constitutes culture? And what > constitutes acts of > culturality? > Cheers, > Zee > > ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Exclusive Xmas Game, help Santa with his celebrity party - http://santas-christmas-party.yahoo.net/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | OPEN CALL: LA Freewaves (experimental media art, video, animation, shorts): 00078, anne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Urbanstudy] Re: Problematizing Definitions: 00078, Prem Chandavarkar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Urbanstudy] Re: Problematizing Definitionsi: 00078, zainab |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Urbanstudy] Re: Problematizing Definitions: 00078, Prem Chandavarkar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |