Subject: Re: FACTION TWO BLOODLINERS - msg#00054

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Fwd: [cia-drugs] From World Economic Forum: Want to Know The Future ?

-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ??not soap-boxingâ??please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â??with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâ??is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Om --- Begin Message --- -Caveat Lector- In the ten years that I have covered global meetings and in all the time that I have devoted to understanding the international structure above the nation-state, I find there is a “global knowledge divide.” In other words, the American worker does not have any idea about what is happening outside of their 50 mile square circumference.       FROM WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM: WANT TO KNOW THE FUTURE?       By Joan VeonJanuary 27, 2006 When you want to know what the weather will be, you read the newspaper forecast and if that is not current enough, you go to the internet or the Weather Channel. When you want to know how your life will be affected as a result of political, economic, trade, and legal changes, you go to specific sources. As a freelance reporter I stumbled onto the international level as a result naiveté and a lack of knowledge as to the real workings of the world. Little did I know when I saw the actors of world government discussing how the world was going to be run in 1994 at a UN conference, that I would end up identifying as many power sources as I could and then covering their meetings in order to understand what was really happening at the global level that the mainstream media was not explaining to “we the people.” Early on, I found a number of very powerful meetings that have and are affecting how we live in an interdependent world. The annual meeting of the World Economic Forum-WEF in Davos, Switzerland is one of them. While many of us work for large multinational or transnational corporations, we are somewhat remote from the chief executive officer, even though his power is felt daily. Imagine what happens when you bring 1,000 CEO’s from the world’s largest and most powerful corporations along with the heads of state, international organizations like the United Nations, World Bank and International Labor Organization, non-governmental organizations, religious leaders, and royalty? Ideas flow and people and power connect. However, we need to ask, who really benefits? As I have analyzed the attendees, there is an “inner core” of participants at the WEF who are members of some of the world’s most powerful organizations whose goal is a world governmental structure. They include the Royal Institute for International Affairs, now called the Chatham House, the Tri-Lateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, and the Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum. Sometimes you will see a Fabian socialist or an Oppenheimer, Rockefeller, and for the first time, Nathaniel Rothschild, who has been named a WEF Young Global Leader. Furthermore, every member of the British royal family has been here with the exception of the queen. In a world where there are no barriers between the nation-states, this year’s meeting is focusing on a “post-knowledge world,” that is where the world is being transitioned from globalization to “Goggleization.” According to WEF Founder Klaus Schwab, The assumptions, tools and frameworks that leaders from business, government, and civil society have employed over the past decade seem increasingly outdated. Globalization has become so entrenched and seemingly irreversible that we have even started to talk of a world that is flat. But if our world is indeed flat, it is not yet a uniform surface—our task is to make those connections better—with new rules, new institutions, and especially, through creative leadership (emphasis added). It is apparent to most Americans when they go shopping, that the power of American manufacturing has been shifted to China since they have the largest pool of cheap-slave labor. It is also apparent to the white collar worker that India is now able to help their company reduce labor costs. Will outsourcing go away? No. There is a very major shift taking place in the global workforce. Not only are people migrating to find work—whether it be those from Nicaragua or Mexico who come to America but Africans are now migrating to Ireland for the same purpose: work. This is happening worldwide. In a workshop on job, Labor Secretary Elaine Chao painted a rosy pink picture of the U.S. economy and how the federal government has put in place very expensive programs to provide laid off workers with all kinds of benefits during their time of re-education, a panel member asked her if it was really working when someone from the audience called out that most people and companies don’t qualify for it. It was then that she admitted the U.S. has a “skills gap.” Unfortunately, Ms. Chao looked pretty poor in the eyes of the audience as they snickered over some of her other pie in the sky remarks about small town re-employment. She did not spend too much time on how to re-educate a 50 or 60 year old with a high school level of education and no real developed skills. Where are the jobs for the future? They are in healthcare, nursing (for a graying baby boomer generation), skilled trades such as plumbers, electricians, and construction workers, advanced manufacturing, nanotechnology, and biosciences to name a few. In a global economy where the worker is being spun off as a result of the fast paced change of the work environment, I find it curious that there is much discussion about corporations ending their defined benefit programs and the need to make retirement benefits portable, along with healthcare benefits. Corporations, in an effort to reduce expenses and compete globally, are looking to provide every worker with portable benefits: healthcare and retirement. Look out—this is all coming to your employer soon. Is this a departure from the world we knew? Yes. In a market-based world where the market is king, the care of the employee has been replaced by the demands of the market. Is that understandable? It would be more understandable if we were the CEO, pulling down a $20 million a year salary with life-time perks. However, in a society where the ability for a family to feed themselves by raising chickens, cows and vegetables has been replaced by the city and dependence on outside employment, this is reality. Is it civility? In the ten years that I have covered global meetings and in all the time that I have devoted to understanding the international structure above the nation-state, I find there is a “global knowledge divide.” In other words, the American worker does not have any idea about what is happening outside of their 50 mile square circumference. People look at me as if I am a crazy lady when I start explaining the international structure above the nation-state. Why do all the other workers in the world understand this and yet Americans do not? None of our politicians are willing to real tell Americans what they have done to change it. Several years ago, I confronted Elaine Chao about the 20 million manufacturing jobs that were sent to China. She was very terse as she explained that it is up to the average worker to look ahead in order to determine if they have the right skills. Unfortunately, the average American is pretty dumbed down and does not think they have to because America is America. However that America is vanishing. At every turn here at the World Economic Forum, the discussion is on the rise of India and China and how they will affect a US-centric world. The overall opinion is that the possibility of the U.S. losing its grip on the world is not too far fetched. The post-knowledge world says “cheaper, faster and better” is not enough, you need the right employee with the right skills for the right job and if that means outsourcing that is the reality. In a technological world, you can find employees anywhere in the world, all they need is a computer hook-up. According to MorganStanley economist, Stephen Roach, the American consumer has been spending stock and home equity savings and will not have too much more to spend in the near future, thus shifting the need for a consumer based economy to China and India’s rising classes. In other words, the ability for the American consumer to carry the world comes at our expense. With regard to an interconnected world, this year’s forum will sponsor a discussion on a “new mindset for the UN.” Thursday’s session will discuss why the world needs a UN and how to strengthen its credibility. It should be noted that the UN was given a major power boost in 2000 and then last September. Their power has been evolving for over 60 years. Interestingly enough, the UN has never has power to enforce, because it is a voluntary organization. Because of the number of global rules and regulations that are not mandatory, there is now discussion about giving the UN the “right to enforce.” It should be noted that at every WEF, there is usually a number of powerful U.S. cabinet members, senators, and congressmen interacting to consensus. The bottom line, if you want to know your future, you need to look up to the international level and pay attention to meetings like this. © 2006 Joan Veon - All Rights Reserved Joan Veon is a businesswoman and international reporter, having covered 64 Global meetings around the world in the last ten years. Please visit her website: www.womensgroup.org. To get a copy of her WTO report, send $10.00 to The Women's International Media Group, Inc. P. O. Box 77, Middletown, MD 21769. For an information packet, please call 301-371-0541 E-Mail: jveon@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.newswithviews.com/Veon/joan33.htm -------------+ Will the UN Dip Into Your Future Salary? 1-30-06 From World Economic Forum: Want to Know The Future? 1-27-06 Slouching Toward Global Enslavement 1-20-06 New Tax Scheme on The Horizon 11-1-05 The Bank for International Settlements Calls for Global Currency 8-3-05 Without Africa's Poverty, Global Taxation is Not Possible 7-30-05 What About Africa? 7-23-05 Reform the U.N. by Eliminating the Commonwealth 5-18-05 Global Tax Almost a Reality 5-3-05 The World Economic Forum Forges The Future of The World 2-3-05 How Global Taxation Will Come Through the American Foreign Policy 1-30-05 The World Tax Tsunami 1-29-05 The World Economic Forum: Facilitating a New World Order 1-27-05 The Debates are Really About Chromosomes and Votes 10-22-04 Preparing Americans For Electronic Money Through Consumption Tax 8-16-04 Sustainable Development, Agenda 21 and Prince Charles 8-13-04 The United Nations Fosters a "UN of Corporations" 7-23-04 The Law of The Sea Treaty - A Done Deal 6-28-04 The Group of 8 Sets the Course For the 21st Century 6-17-04 Veon Interview With High Level Treasury Group of Eight 6-11-04 Global Rapid Deployment Force Getting G8 Backing 6-11-04 Global Taxation Rears Its Ugly Head 5-2-04 Letting The Markets Determine The Value of The Dollar 4-29-04 The Difference Between Schwarzenegger and Gibson is John 14:6 3-8-04 Who Are The G7 Finance Ministers 2-29-04 Its Not The Currency Stupid, Its Integration! 2-20-04 Global Volatility Facilitates Global Financial Integration 2-9-04 Veon Interviews US Treasury Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Tony Fratto 2-7-04 The Year of the Monkey and China's New Role in The World Economy 1-23-04 US Leaders Highlight World Economic Forum Agenda 1-21-04 A Done Deal: Free Trade Areas of The Americas 11-23-03 Government Announces the Outsourcing of Professional Jobs 9-13-03 Chicago, Inc. 8-31-03 World's Monetary System The Bank For International Settlements  8-26-03 Global Taxation And Tax Harmonization  8-20-03 Does The Global Economy Need a Global Currency?  8-16-03 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web.   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: cia-drugs-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== --- End Message ---

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: CELLPHONES ANOTHER DEPOPULATION METHOD

-Caveat Lector- Read the post below to see the particulars. Amateur radio magazines have issued over 100 warnings to users of amateur radio handhelds over the last 25 years. And those just operate in the 144 megahertz and 440 megahertz range which is incredibly safe as compared to the ultra-dangerous 900 megazhertz range that cellphones operate at. Mull this over while you're making your next cellphone telephone call. The ORIGINAL MICROWAVE OVENS operated at the very same frequency as the currently operating cellphones. 900 Megahertz. The longer you talk on your cellphone the more energy your inner ear and brain tissue absorb from the microwave generators that are known as cellphones. A lady I know about 10 miles away just had a brain tumor removed. ( non malignant ). But she is now acutely sensitive to smells such as are in soaps and colognes. She had a 900 megahertz cordless telephone in her kitchen. > Cell Phones: The Largest Biological Experiment Ever (except that > it's no experiment) > 'In 2002, Gro Harlem Brundtland, then head of the World Health > Organization, told a Norwegian journalist that cell phones were banned > from her office in Geneva because she personally becomes ill if a cell > phone is brought within about four meters (13 feet) of her. Mrs. > Brundtland is a medical doctor and former Prime Minister of Norway. > > This sensational news, published March 9, 2002 in Dagbladet, was > ignored by every other newspaper in the world. The following week > Michael Repacholi, her subordinate in charge of the International EMF > (electromagnetic field) Project, responded with a public statement > belittling his boss¹s concerns. Five months later, for reasons that > many suspect were related to these circumstances, Mrs. Brundtland > announced she would step down from her leadership post at the WHO after > just one term.' > > > > The Largest Biological Experiment Ever > > > by Arthur Firstenberg > > > In 2002, Gro Harlem Brundtland, then head of the World Health > Organization, told a Norwegian journalist that cell phones were banned > from her office in Geneva because she personally becomes ill if a cell > phone is brought within about four meters (13 feet) of her. Mrs. > Brundtland is a medical doctor and former Prime Minister of Norway. > This sensational news, published March 9, 2002 in Dagbladet, was > ignored by every other newspaper in the world. The following week > Michael Repacholi, her subordinate in charge of the International EMF > (electromagnetic field) Project, responded with a public statement > belittling his boss¹s concerns. Five months later, for reasons that > many suspect were related to these circumstances, Mrs. Brundtland > announced she would step down from her leadership post at the WHO after > just one term. > > > > Nothing could better illustrate our collective schizophrenia when it > comes to thinking about electromagnetic radiation. We respond to those > who are worried about its dangers ? hence the International EMF Project > ? but we ignore and marginalize those, like Mrs. Brundtland, who have > already succumbed to its effects. > > > > As a consultant on the health effects of wireless technology, I receive > calls that can be broadly divided into two main groups: those from > people who are merely worried, whom I will call A, and those from > people who are already sick, whom I will call B. I sometimes wish I > could arrange a large conference call and have the two groups talk to > each other ? there needs to be more mutual understanding so that we are > all trying to solve the same problems. Caller A, worried, commonly asks > what kind of shield to buy for his cell phone or what kind of headset > to wear with it. Sometimes he wants to know what is a safe distance to > live from a cell tower. Caller B, sick, wants to know what kind of > shielding to put on her house, what kind of medical treatment to get, > or, increasingly often, what part of the country she could move to to > escape the radiation to save her life. > > > The following is designed as a sort of a primer: first, to help > everybody get more or less on the same page, and second, to clear up > some of the confusions so that we can make rational decisions toward a > healthier world. > > > Fundamentals > > The most basic fact about cell phones and cell towers is that they emit > microwave radiation; so do Wi-Fi (wireless Internet) antennas, wireless > computers, cordless (portable) phones and their base units, and all > other wireless devices. If it¹s a communication device and it¹s not > attached to the wall by a wire, it¹s emitting radiation. Most Wi-Fi > systems and some cordless phones operate at the exact same frequency as > a microwave oven, while other devices use a different frequency. Wi-Fi > is always on and always radiating. The base units of most cordless > phones are always radiating, even when no one is using the phone. A > cell phone that is on but not in use is also radiating. And, needless > to say, cell towers are always radiating. > > > > Why is this a problem, you might ask? Scientists usually divide the > electromagnetic spectrum into ³ionizing² and ³non-ionizing.² Ionizing > radiation, which includes x-rays and atomic radiation, causes cancer. > Non-ionizing radiation, which includes microwave radiation, is supposed > to be safe. This distinction always reminded me of the propaganda in > George Orwell¹s Animal Farm: ³Four legs good, two legs bad.² > ³Non-ionizing good, ionizing bad² is as little to be trusted. > > > > An astronomer once quipped that if Neil Armstrong had taken a cell > phone to the Moon in 1969, it would have appeared to be the third most > powerful source of microwave radiation in the universe, next only to > the Sun and the Milky Way. He was right. Life evolved with negligible > levels of microwave radiation. An increasing number of scientists > speculate that our own cells, in fact, use the microwave spectrum to > communicate with one another, like children whispering in the dark, and > that cell phones, like jackhammers, interfere with their signaling. In > any case, it is a fact that we are all being bombarded, day in and day > out, whether we use a cell phone or not, by an amount of microwave > radiation that is some ten million times as strong as the average > natural background. And it is also a fact that most of this radiation > is due to technology that has been developed since the 1970s. > > > > As far as cell phones themselves are concerned, if you put one up to > your head you are damaging your brain in a number of different ways. > First, think of a microwave oven. A cell phone, like a microwave oven > and unlike a hot shower, heats you from the inside out, not from the > outside in. And there are no sensory nerve endings in the brain to warn > you of a rise in temperature because we did not evolve with microwave > radiation, and this never happens in nature. Worse, the structure of > the head and brain is so complex and non-uniform that ³hot spots² are > produced, where heating can be tens or hundreds of times what it is > nearby. Hot spots can occur both close to the surface of the skull and > deep within the brain, and also on a molecular level. > > > > Cell phones are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission, and > you can find, in the packaging of most new phones, a number called the > Specific Absorption Rate, or SAR, which is supposed to indicate the > rate at which energy is absorbed by the brain from that particular > model. One problem, however, is the arbitrary assumption, upon which > the FCC¹s regulations are based, that the brain can safely dissipate > added heat at a rate of up to 1 degree C per hour. Compounding this is > the scandalous procedure used to demonstrate compliance with these > limits and give each cell phone its SAR rating. The standard way to > measure SAR is on a ³phantom² consisting, incredibly, of a homogenous > fluid encased in Plexiglas in the shape of a head. Presto, no hot > spots! But in reality, people who use cell phones for hours per day are > chronically heating places in their brain. The FCC¹s safety standard, > by the way, was developed by electrical engineers, not doctors. > > > > The Blood-Brain Barrier > > The second effect that I want to focus on, which has been proven in the > laboratory, should by itself have been enough to shut down this > industry and should be enough to scare away anyone from ever using a > cell phone again. I call it the ³smoking gun² of cell phone > experiments. Like most biological effects of microwave radiation, this > has nothing to do with heating. > > > > The brain is protected by tight junctions between adjacent cells of > capillary walls, the so-called blood-brain barrier, which, like a > border patrol, lets nutrients pass through from the blood to the brain, > but keeps toxic substances out. Since 1988, researchers in the > laboratory of a Swedish neurosurgeon, Leif Salford, have been running > variations on this simple experiment: they expose young laboratory rats > to either a cell phone or other source of microwave radiation, and > later they sacrifice the animals and look for albumin in their brain > tissue. Albumin is a protein that is a normal component of blood but > that does not normally cross the blood-brain barrier. The presence of > albumin in brain tissue is always a sign that blood vessels have been > damaged and that the brain has lost some of its protection. > > > > Here is what these researchers have found, consistently for 18 years: > Microwave radiation, at doses equal to a cell phone¹s emissions, causes > albumin to be found in brain tissue. A one-time exposure to an ordinary > cell phone for just two minutes causes albumin to leak into the brain. > In one set of experiments, reducing the exposure level by a factor of > 1,000 actually increased the damage to the blood-brain barrier, showing > that this is not a dose-response effect and that reducing the power > will not make wireless technology safer. And finally, in research > published in June 2003, a single two-hour exposure to a cell phone, > just once during its lifetime, permanently damaged the blood-brain > barrier and, on autopsy 50 days later, was found to have damaged or > destroyed up to 2 percent of an animal¹s brain cells, including cells > in areas of the brain concerned with learning, memory and movement.1 > Reducing the exposure level by a factor of 10 or 100, thereby > duplicating the effect of wearing a headset, moving a cell phone > further from your body, or standing next to somebody else¹s phone, did > not appreciably change the results! Even at the lowest exposure, half > the animals had a moderate to high number of damaged neurons. > > > > The implications for us? Two minutes on a cell phone disrupts the > blood-brain barrier, two hours on a cell phone causes permanent brain > damage, and secondhand radiation may be almost as bad. The blood-brain > barrier is the same in a rat and a human being. > > > > These results caused enough of a commotion in Europe that in November > 2003 a conference was held, sponsored by the European Union, titled > ³The Blood-Brain Barrier ? Can It Be Influenced by RF [radio > frequency]-Field Interactions?² as if to reassure the public: ³See, we > are doing something about this.² But, predictably, nothing was done > about it, as nothing has been done about it for 30 years. > > > > America¹s Allan Frey, during the 1970s, was the first of many to > demonstrate that low-level microwave radiation damages the blood-brain > barrier.2 Similar mechanisms protect the eye (the blood-vitreous > barrier) and the fetus (the placental barrier), and the work of Frey > and others indicates that microwave radiation damages those barriers > also.3 The implication: > No pregnant woman should ever be using a cell phone. > > > > Dr. Salford is quite outspoken about his work. He has called the use of > handheld > cell phones ³the largest human biological experiment ever.² And he has > publicly warned that a whole generation of cell-phone-using teenagers > may suffer from mental deficits or Alzheimer¹s disease by the time they > reach middle age. > > > Radio-Wave Sickness > > More- > http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/BACKUP%20PAGES/largest_biological_experiment.htm > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ??not soap-boxingâ??please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â??with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâ??is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ========================================================================

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Fwd: [cia-drugs] From World Economic Forum: Want to Know The Future ?

-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ??not soap-boxingâ??please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â??with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâ??is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Om --- Begin Message --- -Caveat Lector- In the ten years that I have covered global meetings and in all the time that I have devoted to understanding the international structure above the nation-state, I find there is a “global knowledge divide.” In other words, the American worker does not have any idea about what is happening outside of their 50 mile square circumference.       FROM WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM: WANT TO KNOW THE FUTURE?       By Joan VeonJanuary 27, 2006 When you want to know what the weather will be, you read the newspaper forecast and if that is not current enough, you go to the internet or the Weather Channel. When you want to know how your life will be affected as a result of political, economic, trade, and legal changes, you go to specific sources. As a freelance reporter I stumbled onto the international level as a result naiveté and a lack of knowledge as to the real workings of the world. Little did I know when I saw the actors of world government discussing how the world was going to be run in 1994 at a UN conference, that I would end up identifying as many power sources as I could and then covering their meetings in order to understand what was really happening at the global level that the mainstream media was not explaining to “we the people.” Early on, I found a number of very powerful meetings that have and are affecting how we live in an interdependent world. The annual meeting of the World Economic Forum-WEF in Davos, Switzerland is one of them. While many of us work for large multinational or transnational corporations, we are somewhat remote from the chief executive officer, even though his power is felt daily. Imagine what happens when you bring 1,000 CEO’s from the world’s largest and most powerful corporations along with the heads of state, international organizations like the United Nations, World Bank and International Labor Organization, non-governmental organizations, religious leaders, and royalty? Ideas flow and people and power connect. However, we need to ask, who really benefits? As I have analyzed the attendees, there is an “inner core” of participants at the WEF who are members of some of the world’s most powerful organizations whose goal is a world governmental structure. They include the Royal Institute for International Affairs, now called the Chatham House, the Tri-Lateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, and the Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum. Sometimes you will see a Fabian socialist or an Oppenheimer, Rockefeller, and for the first time, Nathaniel Rothschild, who has been named a WEF Young Global Leader. Furthermore, every member of the British royal family has been here with the exception of the queen. In a world where there are no barriers between the nation-states, this year’s meeting is focusing on a “post-knowledge world,” that is where the world is being transitioned from globalization to “Goggleization.” According to WEF Founder Klaus Schwab, The assumptions, tools and frameworks that leaders from business, government, and civil society have employed over the past decade seem increasingly outdated. Globalization has become so entrenched and seemingly irreversible that we have even started to talk of a world that is flat. But if our world is indeed flat, it is not yet a uniform surface—our task is to make those connections better—with new rules, new institutions, and especially, through creative leadership (emphasis added). It is apparent to most Americans when they go shopping, that the power of American manufacturing has been shifted to China since they have the largest pool of cheap-slave labor. It is also apparent to the white collar worker that India is now able to help their company reduce labor costs. Will outsourcing go away? No. There is a very major shift taking place in the global workforce. Not only are people migrating to find work—whether it be those from Nicaragua or Mexico who come to America but Africans are now migrating to Ireland for the same purpose: work. This is happening worldwide. In a workshop on job, Labor Secretary Elaine Chao painted a rosy pink picture of the U.S. economy and how the federal government has put in place very expensive programs to provide laid off workers with all kinds of benefits during their time of re-education, a panel member asked her if it was really working when someone from the audience called out that most people and companies don’t qualify for it. It was then that she admitted the U.S. has a “skills gap.” Unfortunately, Ms. Chao looked pretty poor in the eyes of the audience as they snickered over some of her other pie in the sky remarks about small town re-employment. She did not spend too much time on how to re-educate a 50 or 60 year old with a high school level of education and no real developed skills. Where are the jobs for the future? They are in healthcare, nursing (for a graying baby boomer generation), skilled trades such as plumbers, electricians, and construction workers, advanced manufacturing, nanotechnology, and biosciences to name a few. In a global economy where the worker is being spun off as a result of the fast paced change of the work environment, I find it curious that there is much discussion about corporations ending their defined benefit programs and the need to make retirement benefits portable, along with healthcare benefits. Corporations, in an effort to reduce expenses and compete globally, are looking to provide every worker with portable benefits: healthcare and retirement. Look out—this is all coming to your employer soon. Is this a departure from the world we knew? Yes. In a market-based world where the market is king, the care of the employee has been replaced by the demands of the market. Is that understandable? It would be more understandable if we were the CEO, pulling down a $20 million a year salary with life-time perks. However, in a society where the ability for a family to feed themselves by raising chickens, cows and vegetables has been replaced by the city and dependence on outside employment, this is reality. Is it civility? In the ten years that I have covered global meetings and in all the time that I have devoted to understanding the international structure above the nation-state, I find there is a “global knowledge divide.” In other words, the American worker does not have any idea about what is happening outside of their 50 mile square circumference. People look at me as if I am a crazy lady when I start explaining the international structure above the nation-state. Why do all the other workers in the world understand this and yet Americans do not? None of our politicians are willing to real tell Americans what they have done to change it. Several years ago, I confronted Elaine Chao about the 20 million manufacturing jobs that were sent to China. She was very terse as she explained that it is up to the average worker to look ahead in order to determine if they have the right skills. Unfortunately, the average American is pretty dumbed down and does not think they have to because America is America. However that America is vanishing. At every turn here at the World Economic Forum, the discussion is on the rise of India and China and how they will affect a US-centric world. The overall opinion is that the possibility of the U.S. losing its grip on the world is not too far fetched. The post-knowledge world says “cheaper, faster and better” is not enough, you need the right employee with the right skills for the right job and if that means outsourcing that is the reality. In a technological world, you can find employees anywhere in the world, all they need is a computer hook-up. According to MorganStanley economist, Stephen Roach, the American consumer has been spending stock and home equity savings and will not have too much more to spend in the near future, thus shifting the need for a consumer based economy to China and India’s rising classes. In other words, the ability for the American consumer to carry the world comes at our expense. With regard to an interconnected world, this year’s forum will sponsor a discussion on a “new mindset for the UN.” Thursday’s session will discuss why the world needs a UN and how to strengthen its credibility. It should be noted that the UN was given a major power boost in 2000 and then last September. Their power has been evolving for over 60 years. Interestingly enough, the UN has never has power to enforce, because it is a voluntary organization. Because of the number of global rules and regulations that are not mandatory, there is now discussion about giving the UN the “right to enforce.” It should be noted that at every WEF, there is usually a number of powerful U.S. cabinet members, senators, and congressmen interacting to consensus. The bottom line, if you want to know your future, you need to look up to the international level and pay attention to meetings like this. © 2006 Joan Veon - All Rights Reserved Joan Veon is a businesswoman and international reporter, having covered 64 Global meetings around the world in the last ten years. Please visit her website: www.womensgroup.org. To get a copy of her WTO report, send $10.00 to The Women's International Media Group, Inc. P. O. Box 77, Middletown, MD 21769. For an information packet, please call 301-371-0541 E-Mail: jveon@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.newswithviews.com/Veon/joan33.htm -------------+ Will the UN Dip Into Your Future Salary? 1-30-06 From World Economic Forum: Want to Know The Future? 1-27-06 Slouching Toward Global Enslavement 1-20-06 New Tax Scheme on The Horizon 11-1-05 The Bank for International Settlements Calls for Global Currency 8-3-05 Without Africa's Poverty, Global Taxation is Not Possible 7-30-05 What About Africa? 7-23-05 Reform the U.N. by Eliminating the Commonwealth 5-18-05 Global Tax Almost a Reality 5-3-05 The World Economic Forum Forges The Future of The World 2-3-05 How Global Taxation Will Come Through the American Foreign Policy 1-30-05 The World Tax Tsunami 1-29-05 The World Economic Forum: Facilitating a New World Order 1-27-05 The Debates are Really About Chromosomes and Votes 10-22-04 Preparing Americans For Electronic Money Through Consumption Tax 8-16-04 Sustainable Development, Agenda 21 and Prince Charles 8-13-04 The United Nations Fosters a "UN of Corporations" 7-23-04 The Law of The Sea Treaty - A Done Deal 6-28-04 The Group of 8 Sets the Course For the 21st Century 6-17-04 Veon Interview With High Level Treasury Group of Eight 6-11-04 Global Rapid Deployment Force Getting G8 Backing 6-11-04 Global Taxation Rears Its Ugly Head 5-2-04 Letting The Markets Determine The Value of The Dollar 4-29-04 The Difference Between Schwarzenegger and Gibson is John 14:6 3-8-04 Who Are The G7 Finance Ministers 2-29-04 Its Not The Currency Stupid, Its Integration! 2-20-04 Global Volatility Facilitates Global Financial Integration 2-9-04 Veon Interviews US Treasury Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Tony Fratto 2-7-04 The Year of the Monkey and China's New Role in The World Economy 1-23-04 US Leaders Highlight World Economic Forum Agenda 1-21-04 A Done Deal: Free Trade Areas of The Americas 11-23-03 Government Announces the Outsourcing of Professional Jobs 9-13-03 Chicago, Inc. 8-31-03 World's Monetary System The Bank For International Settlements  8-26-03 Global Taxation And Tax Harmonization  8-20-03 Does The Global Economy Need a Global Currency?  8-16-03 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web.   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: cia-drugs-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== --- End Message ---

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: FACTION TWO REPTILIANS

-Caveat Lector- This animosity between the TWO GANGS of REPTILIANS is to our advantage. Divide and conquer right. They hate each other with impunity. This hatred is somewhat bent around religious lines. The Pope of Rome is of course a butt kissing toady for one of the Reptilian gangs. The CITY of LONDON TEMPLARS are on the other side of the ring. We the PAWNS in the GAME are caught in the middle. This historic enmity has been going on for centuries. July 20 1944. FACTION TWO REPTILIANS try to murder DER FUEHRER ( Adolf Hitler ). After the war FACTION TWO REPTILIANS were relocated to Oklahoma City Oklahoma. There they become FOUNDING FATHERS of the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. Even though the C.I.A. had been around since 1861 and had at least 40 other secret names. The FACTION TWO REPTILIANS started WORLD WAR I in August of 1914. And of course lost all of their land holdings. I previously posted an almost complete list of those REPTILIANS who lost their assets. Then looking back in history. MARCH of 1783 BONNIE PRINCE CHARLIE offered the job as KING of the UNITED STATES by members of the ORDER of CINCINNATI. NOVEMBER 1781 KING GEORGE the THIRD informs Parliament that the THIRTEEN COLONIES have been lost temporarily. But that he has already CONCOCTED a SECRET PLAN for regaining hegemony over the colonies which he vows is 100 percent foolproof. And will be even better than the old hegemony. OCTOBER 1781 KING GEORGE the THIRD of ENGLAND another ( reptilian-vampire ) loses control of the THIRTEEN COLONIES( but only temporarily ). 1745 BONNIE PRINCE CHARLIE ( Charles Edward Stuart) invades England from Scotland and makes it within 100 miles of London. His invasion falls apart. And then the DUKE of CUMBERLAND became his and Scotland's WORST NIGHTMARE. The DUKE killed everything in sight. Even the dogs and cats were killed. 1688 JAMES EDWARD STUART the 2nd kicked out of England by WILLIAM of ORANGE(Orange-Nissau-DeGuelph ) from Holland. But on the way out of England Stuart throws the ROYAL NOTARY SEAL into the Thames River as one last act of defiance. 1640 ( give or take a few years ) CHARLES EDWARD STUART beheaded by Oliver Cromwell's gang. 1605 QUEEN ELIZABETH the 1st turns over power to JAMES EDWARD STUART the 1st. Stuart promptly purchases land which becomes the CITY of LONDON. And charters the VIRGINIA COMPANY in 1607. 1587 MARY STUART the QUEEN of the VAMPIRES is beheaded by the CECIL FAMILY ( another vampire gang still in power today ). 1536 HENRY the 8Th arrests everybody with SIX FINGERS that he can locate and has them all beheaded. The SIX FINGERED RACE are a rival space alien race. The REPTILIANS view them as a great danger. 1535 HENRY the 8TH divorces Catherine of Aragon and creates the Anglican church. 1307 JACQUE DEMOLAY arrested and barbequed by order of the POPE of ROME. 875 DAGOBERT assassinated by Charlemagnes father. > > > > > > > > > > The September 2003 issue of Vanity Fair said that > > all of the F2 Bloodliners would be returned to power. > > Even the Hohenzollerns of Prussia(Germany) would > > again be in control of that country. Note: There > > is always something relevant in Vanity Fair. > > > I know that the former Premier of Romania > > ( Nicolai Ceaucescu ) believed that he was the > > reincarnation of Count Dracula. And that when > > when he had his personal helicopter totally full > > of fuel and could have left Romania for sanctuary > > in another country he instead flew to CASTLE BRAN > > the ancestral home of VLAD DRACULA. > > > There he was arrested and brought back to Bucharest > > and stood before a firing squad. > > > Yeah the FACTION TWO GANG are there waiting in the > > wings. Their intention is to not only take back > > control of their own kingdoms again. But to > > oust the FACTION TWO GANG of REPTILIANS who operate > > out of the CITY of LONDON. > > > What the hell dont be surprised at anything. But > > do keep in mind that the TWO WARRING FACTIONS of > > REPTILIANS still hate each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> What do you think is going on here Mike? >> >> http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=85104 >> >> RETURN of the F2 ROYALS >> >> Posted By: Mammonator <Send E-Mail> >> Date: Monday, 6 February 2006, 2:27 p.m. >> >> Rayelan has often spoken of our need to watch for signs of returning >> Faction 2 Royals of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. I submit the following >> for your consideration: >> >> *************************************************************************** >> Romania Returning 'Dracula's Castle' To Pre-Communist-Era Owners >> >> 3 February 2006 -- Romania's government today said authorities will >> return two castles which belonged to members of the former royal family. >> >> The Peles Castle, located in the mountain resort of Sinaia, will be >> returned to Romania's former monarch, King Michael, of the >> Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen family, who owned it before it was confiscated >> by the communist regime in 1948. >> >> The 14th-century Bran Castle, which is located in Transylvania and is >> also known as the Dracula Castle, will be given to members of the >> Habsburg family, who inherited the estate of Romania's Princess Ileana. >> >> [SNIP] >> >> For the rest of the article, please see: >> >> >> http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2006/02/AD3A46A1-2E9C-4A48-9005-AB7585373B74.html >> >> *************************************************************************** >> >> Other online resources say that some Austro-Hungarian territory went >> to >> Romania >> >> and >> >> 1867 Transylvania becomes part of the Hungarian Kingdom in the >> Austro-Hungarian Empire... >> >> Any comments Rayelan? >> >> Blessings, >> >> Mammonator >> >> * >> * >> >> > > > > david icke web site: > www.davidicke.com > > please note this list is unauthorised & unofficial and has nothing to do > with david icke himself. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DavidIcke/ > > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > DavidIcke-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ??not soap-boxingâ??please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â??with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâ??is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ========================================================================