Hello
Kris -Fonebone here
remember me ?
Please allow me a short
introduction to your group .
I came to CIA-DRUGS a
couple of years back in an effort
to ferret out clues
that would reveal the identities of the ghouls that created a
"long silver train " of
eviscerated dead Viet-Nam soldiers ---
filled with decks of heroin
from
the SECOND LARGEST
HEROIN production area in the world ---
-- the GOLDEN
TRIANGLE area of south-east Asia--
effectively utilizing the
soldiers' corpses to mule the poison home to American streets
----
miraculously - just
in time to feed the heroin habits or the living dead adopted " in- country " in
desperation
by battle fatigued and
shell shocked soldiers
to blunt the effects
of PTSD
These attempts at
self-medication allowed these tortured and traumatized
men
the temporary mental respite from the daily
assaults to the senses of sight and smell
war generates -
not to mention the wounds inflicted upon their
souls
But - This a topic for another time --- Soon I hope
--
especially timely I would suspect in light of the
facts ---
Ubiquitous cheap potent heroin in America and a steady
stream of DEAD SOLDIERS
are flowing home from a heroin producing area -
this time --
the LARGEST HEROIN producing area of the
world
-- the
"GOLDEN CRESCENT " area of
central Asia
and well - quite frankly - I'm wondering if
the group's thinkers might justifiably speculate a second
"long silver train " may be creating a new
conveyer belt of hamburger bags filled with
"white gold " home
from a war zone to American neighborhoods
-
I need not remind you or your group this crime was
never addressed despite the absolute
flood of heroin that mysteriously appeared in our
nation's cities during the height of
the Viet-Nam war hostilities
-
NO I'm here to address another
matter
I am am respectfully requesting your
permission and opportunity
confront amateurish material of Mr.
Salter's
you allowed to be posted in your
forum
WHY ?
As you may remember Kris I was
mysteriously and conveniently " YAHOOED "
which effectively excluded me
from the original
debates by way of
my being prohibited from posting to
CIA-DRUGS for the entire period of
weeks in which Mr. Salter
first appeared and posted his garbage to CIA-DRUGS
and thereby I was not able to post the
evidence that would refute Mr. Salter's flapdoodle
--
SO -- I await you reply
--Fonebone
PS -- If you deem my
evidence on this subject "off topic " we can move directly to
to a more "on topic
" subject such as
"HEROIN in the HEROES "
-- Past and Present -- Bic
? -Fonebone
http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/review.html#update1
Update, 31
October 2005
Here are a few
comments in response to Nico Haupt's analysis of this
article.
First of all, Haupt
brazenly mischaracterizes my article as a critique of "activism" when in fact it
is a technical rebuttal of blatantly false no-767 theories and an analysis of
the pathological and technically incompetent thinking that led to those
mistakes. It's regrettable that I was not able to accurately describe the
current thinking of ex-hologram theorists, but that really doesn't matter. The
misinterpretations of visual anomalies are the same whether they are used to
support hologram or media overlay theories. Thus the substance of my visual
analysis is germane to both theories and doesn't need to be
revisited.
As a matter of fact
I'm absolutely delighted that the non-falsibiable, sci-fi hologram theory has
been abandoned in favor of the media overlay theory. As I pointed out, you don't
even need to consider the visual evidence to dismiss this theory, it is so
utterly impossible: it falls apart on logic and common sense alone. It just
might be the worst conspiracy theory in the history of conspiracy theory. Given
this, I really could and perhaps should end my arguments about the no-767
theories right here, forever, and move on to other things. But a few more
comments on Haupt's analysis will confirm the pathology I talked about in my
commentary.
Haupt attempts to
evade responsibility for his embarrassing advocacy of fanciful interpretations
of a spot of dirt on a windshield by complaining that I used the term "UFO"
instead of "whatzit". As if using the term "whatzit" makes the analysis of a
spot of dirt credible! Then he complains about the 13 helicopters that I don't
explain. This is a common game that is played by this crowd, bringing up some
"new" smoking gun that I haven't covered that supposedly PROVES something was
amiss. So let's talk about the helicopters.
Just what would the
perpetrators of 9/11 be doing with a fleet of 13 helicopters? Nothing I can
think of, at least nothing that couldn't be accomplished from a discrete, hidden
location. Were they trying to advertise that this was a staged event? What
really were these helicopters? Obviously, the gathering of news, police, fire,
and medical helicopters that you would expect, and that would have had the time
to gather by the time of the collapses. Haupt's bug-eyed insinuation of
something fishy going on is a perfect example of the utterly idiotic,
discrediting, crackpot interpretations of ordinary phenomena, driven by "smoking
gun fever," that I alluded to in myarticle.
The public has a
well-conditioned impression, created by official disinformation machine, that
conspiracy theorists are half-mad, technically incompetent fools who see
extraordinary conspiracies in ordinary events. The presumptuous sloppiness of
Haupt and crew feeds right into this perception, just one of the ways they are
helping the fascist perps they claim to be fighting. Inside the movement, their
behavior lends moral authority to those pursuing limited hangouts by making more
radical interpretations look ridiculous.
Haupt's claim that
there is "one" official live footage of the crashof the second plane is false. I
have digitized a videotape of the live broadcast of channel 11 in New York which
shows a shot from their news copter that I have never seen before. Once I get an
internet connection in my new home in exile in the Andes, I'll post it.. This
piece of footage cuts to the heart of the absurd argument that the perps could
have had control over ALL the live and taped footage of the foreign and domestic
networks, the local affiliates, the independent videographers and the ordinary
people who had their cameras running.
The one single
complaint Haupt makes which I find reasonable is that I didn't make a strong
enough distinction between the no-plane and the substitute 767 theories. Of
course the latter is at least possible, and in fact I have carefully made a
point to acknowledge this specific possibility in the past, but the fact remains
that the evidence we've seen so far is either inconclusive (the departure gate
confusion) or totally unreliable (the eminently hackable flight database).
Because of the weak evidence, no one deserves to be castigated as an obfuscator
or "official story supporter" for finding this theory lacking, yet Haupt and
crew have consistently made these kinds of unjustifiably divisive and
acrimonious accusations over this issue all the time.
This line of Haupt's
takes the cake: "Salter seems to be not concernedabout the political situation
worldwide and appears like a well earning digital coach potato." This is the
usual ad hominem attack that the no-planers resort to when their "analysis"
fails to convince.Of course, any reasonable person can see the huge amount of
work and care that went into my article. I must add that I have chronic
disabling back pain as a result of scoliosis and thoracic outlet syndrome, as
well as the lingering side effects of four major surgeries attempting treatment,
all of them failures. It happens that 7 or 8 years ago I couldn't even sit on a
couch to watch TV. Even now, sitting down for hours at my computer to hash
through crackpot crap is a big sacrifice for me. As for "well earning," I have
to admit that I am on the government payroll! In a sense... I receive a pittance
from the Social Security Disability Insurance for my health problems, an amount
that didn´t even pay my rent when I lived in San Francisco. Luckily, it's just
enough for me to live on in a poor, developing country.
I suppose, however,
that Haupt should recruit Gerard Holmgren to invent some fanciful, imaginary
reasons why that disability pension indicates I'm an agent.
This article, and my
previous critiques, were not enjoyable for me, and are not the kind of thing
that I would desire to do. I wrote them simply because I felt it was necessary,
and because of my background and training this was an area where I was
particularly qualified to make a helpful contribution to 9/11 research and
activism. Some fellow activists who agree with my positions have nonetheless
argued that I have spent too much energy on a "fringe" element, and that I was
drawing too much attention to a divisive distraction that they felt would
quickly become a forgotten flash-in-the-pan. Unfortunately, I think that the way
things have played out over the past year, particularly considering the recent
example of Morgan Reynolds, shows that I was right. That said, all the time I
was spending on this article I was grumbling to myself about what I would really
like to be reseaching:
- government suppression of free
energy and antigravity technology.
- elite sponsored new age
cults
- the history of elite Malthusian
agendas and the NWO "B-team"of "earth-friendly" movements
- the 'peak oil' scam, and many
other subjects.
Haupt will recognize
the above issues. He's helping to discredit and reverse the difficult, hard-won
progress of more thoughtful and responsible researchers on these issues by
constantly mentioning them in the same breath as the no-plane
garbage.
That's all I have to
say. At this point, since the self-evidently moronic media overlay theory is the
remaining area of inquiry, I can permanently wash my hands of the no-plane
issue, and focus instead on confronting the fascist perps of 9/11 and the NWO
directly, instead of the intellectually debauched fools who are inadvertently
helping them.
Eric
Salter
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
