|
Re: Re: Cameras: msg#01275culture.backpacking.light
At 00:59 27/09/2002 +0000, dspellman2002 wrote: >35mm film has a data equivalent of about 22-24 megapixels (which would >produce a file of around 70 megabytes). NO CD-burning photofinisher >that I know of will scan at anything approaching that level. The old >(current?) Kodak PhotoCD scanned photos at a couple of megapixels and >then (in one version) interpolated four other versions, both larger >and smaller, from there. I don't like to quibble - but are you sure that isn't old info ? Kodak says (on http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/faqs/faq1001d.shtml ) that >What is the scanner resolution on a PHOTO CD Disc? >For 16 Base scans on either the KODAK PCD Film Scanner 2000 or the KODAK >Professional PCD Film Scanner 4045, the scanner digitizes 2048 x 3072 >pixels over a 35 mm frame of film whose dimensions are 24 mm x 36 mm (0.94 >x 1.42 inches). This translates to a scanning resolution of 2200 >pixels/inch in both dimensions. For 64 Base scans, the Professional PCD >Film Scanner 4045 can scan varying film formats at 4096 x 6144 pixels or >approximately 4400 pixels/inch. so Professional Photo CD should be exactly what you want - and it claims they are scanned at this level, not interpolated. There appear to be lots of places that do the Professional version, though I haven't contacted any of them to verify that, simply looked at the Kodak site, at http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/locators/piw/piwSites.jhtml ) -- Alex. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Cameras: 01275, amytys |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Go Lite: 01275, amytys |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Camerasi: 01275, futabachan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Cameras: 01275, dspellman2002 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |