|
Re: Re: Non-breathable raingear.: msg#00041culture.backpacking.light
Ed, Thanks for the idea. Am I right in assuming that a cagoule comes down to about knee level? If so this sounds great for rain but a bit cumbersome when you use it just as a wind shell, when normal jacket length would be more convenient. How about making the bottom part removable (like the legs on covertible pants). ----- Original Message ----- From: Ed Stiles To: BackpackingLight-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:22 PM Subject: Re: [BackpackingLight] Re: Non-breathable raingear. My thinking is that -- with the open bottom and open pit zips -- the cagoule should ventilate pretty well. With the pit zips closed I can use it to replace the wind shell that I now carry. The cagoule's longer length should eliminate the need for rain pants at milder temps. -- Ed Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ BackpackingLight Mailing List To unsubscribe, send a blank message to: BackpackingLight-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Post messages by E-mailing them to: BackpackingLight-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Non-breathable raingear.: 00041, futabachan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: Non-breathable raingear.: 00041, Ed Stiles |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Re: Non-breathable raingear.i: 00041, Shane Steinkamp |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: Non-breathable raingear.: 00041, Ed Stiles |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |