|
Re: Re: Non-breathable raingear.: msg#00037culture.backpacking.light
> I've found that if your cagoule is considerably larger than you need > it to be it ventilates better because more vapor is lost out the top > by your face. Wearing a pack tends to cinch the cagoule up so it > doesn't flap or get in the way, even if it is oversize for you. I couldn't decide whether to make the medium or large size because I'm right at the dividing line between medium and large sizes. Sounds like I should make the large 42-44 chest size, even though my chest is about 40 inches. The larger cagoule will have a roomier hood, longer length and more air space inside. Fortunately, I ordered enough material to make the large. > Personally, I think if you had a flapped Kangaroo pocket in front and > made the back of that pocket a mesh material you could improve the > ventilation even more by leaving the pocket open when you wanted to, > but that's just me. Good luck with your cagoule. Best, Don L. Great idea! I have some no-see-um netting left over from the tent I made. But maybe I'll try to get some coarser mesh. Although the no-see-um has a lot of holes in it, it still does a good job of holding heat inside the tent. So it might not breathe as well as I would like for the cagoule. Thanks for the tip, the pocket's staying. -- Ed |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Non-breathable raingear.: 00037, dladigin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Stepping outside the box: 00037, nicholson1318 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Non-breathable raingear.i: 00037, dladigin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Non-breathable raingear.: 00037, futabachan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |