|
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 163: msg#00157colorsync-users
Interesting. My experience is just the opposite. We moved to Eizo 21 -- > 210 --> 211 from Artisans (big improvement). We observed some minor uniformity issues with the 21 and 210s (which are still working) 211s were much improved. We have seven 211s in use now. Six are great. One has a bit of a cast on one side. To save a few bucks I purchased a few NECs for our camera workstations (2190 UXi with Spectraview). I noticed right away that uniformity was inferior to the Eizos and they were more susceptible to head position invoked color shift. They also look "glassy". My crew of photographers agreed. I've since purchased a couple 2490s and find them much better. I do like Spectraview. Luck of the draw? Personal preference? Environment? Some combination maybe. --David FYI: We are using 120 cdm2 5800-6000k in a darkish room with 40-50% GTI EVS booths. --David On Jul 17, 2009, at 3:03 PM, colorsync-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Message: 8 David Remington Manager, Digital Imaging and Photography Services Digital Imaging and Photography Services D-70 Widener Library Cambridge, MA 02138 p 617-495-4701 f 617-495-0403 w http://imaging.harvard.edu _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (Colorsync-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/colorsync-users/maillists%40codeha.us This email sent to maillists@xxxxxxxxx
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise |