Subject: Re: Help with implementing delegates

On Mar 27, 2009, at 7:48 PM, Drew Lawson wrote:
According to Greg Guerin:

albert jordan Mobility wrote:

In Foo, I have set up the following delegate method

-(void) test: (dgtest *) sender:didFinish: (BOOL) complete

You just gave me a newbie headache.
How is that original parsed?

To parse it you need to know:

A method name doesn't need to have a word before each colon. You could have a method like this:

- (void)printThreeIds:(id)first :(id)second :(id)third;

You would call it like this:

[myObject printThreeIds:self :nil :@"hello"];

Although valid syntax, this practice is discouraged since it makes the method name less readable.

The other thing you need to know is that you don't have to specify the type of a method argument. The type will default to id. So the above method could have been declared like this:

- (void)printThreeIds:first :second :third;

A handy fact to remember is that the number of colons in a method name is the number of arguments the method takes. So if you meant it to take two arguments and you see three colons, you know you have a typo.

Putting all the above together, the faulty method declaration would be parsed as:

- (void)test:(dgtest *)sender // argument named "sender" is of type dgtest*
:didFinish // argument named "didFinish" is of type id
:(BOOL)complete; // argument named "complete" is of type (BOOL)

The OP was able to write a perfectly good looking method that used the sender and complete arguments, never realizing he'd accidentally introduced an argument called didFinish.



Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the ...

moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to maillists@xxxxxxxxx