Re: C#/Mono/CookComputing & xmlrpc2

> On Jan 29, 2004, at 3:03 AM, Adam Williams wrote:
> > I've been running back and forth trying to call OpenGroupware's xmlrpcd
> > from mono,  and then I found this message from The Man Helge himself -
> > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-list/2003-November/
> > 016697.html
> > - and I'm curious if anyone has been able to get this to work?
> I have posted a bug in the Mono bugzilla and someone on the Mono list  
> claimed to have fixed the issue (thats some months ago I think). But I  
> didn't found the time to try again.
> Personally I would love to see something like JOGI for Mono.

"Mogi" :)  I'm shamelessly stealing ideas from JOGI about how to go
about it.

> > I've got a bunch of code and a Gtk# interface defined for tasks,  but I
> > can't communicate with the server to get the tasks.  :( Making
> > interfaces with Glade# is almost fun.
> > http://www.gotmono.com/docs/gnome/bindings/glade/glade.html
> The only UI construction tool worth talking about is IB:
>    http://www.google.com/search?q=apple+interfacebuilder
> ;-)
> > My test code is simple, and works for other XML-RPC servers, but when I
> > turn it on xmlrpcd I just get "crap", and 401 errors in the log.
> Do the "other XML-RPC servers" also use basic authentication?

I think so,  I'll double check exactly how they process authentication; 
but I think that guy left for a mediterranean cruise yesterday.  Darn;
at least for me.

> > Output in RPC server log - note 401 "authentication failed" code -
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > 192.168.1.20 - - [28/Jan/2004:03:43:34 GMT] "POST /RPC2 HTTP/1.1" 401 0
> > 0.003 - - 0
> This is just fine. After that Mono needs to retry the request using the  
> proper credentials as requested by the daemon.

Ok, just never see another try.  This is "preauthenticate" in HTTP
parlance, yes?

> > Pukes, after a long pause, with -
>                   ^^^
> This looks like the issue I run into. Which Mono version do you use?  
> .28 or .29?

0.29.  From the red-carpet channel.  Eagerly awaiting 0.30 which has
lots of other fixes in it; although I have no idea if it will affect
this issue.

-- 
OpenGroupware.org XML-RPC
xmlrpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/xmlrpc