|
osdir.com mailing list archive |
|
Subject: bug#289: Bug modified from CVS checkin - msg#00286List: linux.bbc.bugsThis takes care of everything that was marked LICENSE = BSD. Some still say that, most now say LICENSE = Modified_BSD. Those that still say BSD have different copyright years :< Seth, is it still ok for them to share text or do they each need their own, too? Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date: click to view message previewbug#289: Bug modified from CVS checkinclarifies: 289 This takes care of everything that was marked LICENSE = BSD. Some still say that, most now say LICENSE = Modified_BSD. Those that still say BSD have different copyright years :< Seth, is it still ok for them to share text or do they each need their own, too? Next Message by Date: click to view message previewbug#289: Bug modified from CVS checkinclarifies: 289 This takes care of everything that was marked LICENSE = BSD. Some still say that, most now say LICENSE = Modified_BSD. Those that still say BSD have different copyright years :< Seth, is it still ok for them to share text or do they each need their own, too? Previous Message by Thread: click to view message previewbug#289: Bug modified from CVS checkinclarifies: 289 This takes care of everything that was marked LICENSE = BSD. Some still say that, most now say LICENSE = Modified_BSD. Those that still say BSD have different copyright years :< Seth, is it still ok for them to share text or do they each need their own, too? Next Message by Thread: click to view message previewbug#289: Bug modified from CVS checkinclarifies: 289 This takes care of everything that was marked LICENSE = BSD. Some still say that, most now say LICENSE = Modified_BSD. Those that still say BSD have different copyright years :< Seth, is it still ok for them to share text or do they each need their own, too? Loading Comments...
|
|
