Re: n_free crash

I added a few checks for doing stuff to the root node.

On Aug 22, 2004, at 7:39 PM, James McCartney wrote:

> On Aug 19, 2004, at 4:25 PM, Dave Watson wrote:
>
> > > there are a lot of ways you could cause the server to crash that 
> > > cannot be cheaply checked (i.e. doing a graph analysis at each 
> > > operation), so none are checked for. Perhaps this is reckless but 
> > > that is the way it is.
> >
> > Preventing the removal of node zero when an n_free is received causes 
> > a decent performance hit?
>
> That is not what I said.
> rephrasing:
> Because there are a lot of graph operations that could cause the 
> server to crash that cannot be cheaply checked, no graph operations 
> are checked. Not even simple ones. Perhaps this is reckless but that 
> is the way it is.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
> sc-dev-Ayv8T2snMLBt9CRQqspbbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-dev