Download Firefox: WindowsMac OS X
logo       
Google Custom Search
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Re: [mb-users] CD 9 vs. "disc 9": msg#00110

Subject: Re: [mb-users] CD 9 vs. "disc 9"
A few thoughts

Quoting Neil Cafferkey <caffer@xxxxxxxxx>:

> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:39:54AM +0300, Jukka Santala wrote:
> > I recently added a release titled "Bonus CD 9: Suomi Pop & Rock '98" to 
> > the MusicBrainz database. Some moderator apparently corrected it, 
> > justifiably under the style-rules I suppose, to "Bonus (disc 9)".
> 
> Given the context, your original title seems correct. 9 is effectively the
> volume number in this case.
> 
Would it not be better to entitle this.  

Suomi Pop and Rock '98 (... or perhaps blank in this case): Vol. 9
and have as an album attribute (single, promotional)

There would then be no inconsistency with style guidelines. It would also be 
clearer to vote on. Together with which in months to come this whole thread 
will have been forgotten and someone else will put in an edit if it is not 
consistent with 'styleguide'. It is highly unlikely it would be moderated on 
a 'scrolling edit' and is quite clear as to what it is.

ie it is Suomi Pop and Rock' 98 vol.9 of a promotional series.

That is certainly the style I intend to use when I eventually get round to 
adding my playlist of Punk, which specialised in (bonus tracks) as separate 
(free) add ons.

If it is a separate CD it is a seperate CD however it is distributed. It is 
vol. 9. No question. But it is not necessarily >"Bonus CD 9: Suomi Pop & 
Rock '98" 
 
> > As an aside, is there accepted policy for entering cover-mixes? Ie. 
> > where one or more bands performs covers of (one or) several other 
> > artists on a single album? How does this picture change if it's 
> > classical or neo-classical music? There's an entry in the WiKi detailing 
> > some of the cases, but I'm wondering if there's any accepted quick rules 
> > of thumb.
> 
> For the moment, I'd say just use the covering artists and song titles as 
> normal, and leave out the covered artists, at least for non-classical.

Agree totally, the fact it is a cover is for when MB teaches v6 or 7. and 
has 'About the Artists' with room to talk about 'subjective issues.

In regard to Classical, that is my 'hot topic', but is I acknowledge, a major 
revision needing more consideration.


anarchyintheuk

Who killed Bambi

If this helped you, please take the time to rate the value of this post:
 http://rate.affero.net/anarchyintheuk/

----------------------------------------------
This mail sent through http://www.ukonline.net


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>